What is your definition of 'reputable' when you admit they use fake pics or massive Photoshop?
They're reputable in the sense that you get what you "see" in the pictures, I've never been bait and switched there, the handler has been reasonable with me, but the actual girl is far worse than what the pictures lead you to think, which is exactly what you said. I would say they're still more reputable than like, LegendFantasyland, and along same level of Daynight, but nowhere near AsianFever. I may have set the bar for "reputability" far too low for these Asian shops...
How so? When they use fake stolen pics with "90% similar" (which are not in my view), how is it possible to get what you "see"?
It's just semantics and there's not much point arguing this.
Thanks for the info.
So I contact the luckycat handler through WeChat (not sure if this would affect your interaction with him). He has been pretty professional and quick with the replies, the longest I've waited for a reply was about 5mins. When I asked for more accurate pictures of the girls, he sometimes have different pictures than the ones posted on the site, and those seems to be more accurate (less photoshopped), or pictures other shops uses (so you can kind of confirm which girls are the same over diff shops), and he seems to be more honest about the girls' age range when texting him (site says 21yr, he'll say mid-late 20s). Though some of his response seems to be copy and pasted when asking about what services are included.
