Of course not, that’s just silly
I do however take pictures and document my vacations and special time so I can later enjoy the happy, peaceful memories of time spent away from the real world.Xo
Katey
How do you guys "memorialize" your expeirenc with a SP?
- Thread starter nomis2013
- Start date
I do however take pictures and document my vacations and special time so I can later enjoy the happy, peaceful memories of time spent away from the real world.Xo
Katey
For multi-repeat sp’s, I keep an FFC and punch a virtual notch after each visit, kinda like stamping road-kills on the driver’s door of your semi. Regrets that I can’t cash them in like a diner card or car wash for one free visit after ten. So I just record a few memory triggers: where it was, what she was wearing, the key debauchery that happened, and wham!, my echo sounder re-visualizes the event. I can re-live it any time I pull up the FFC. Sweet.
I do the cool-down dinner afterwards too. Nice I am not alone here, but that is for serenity, gratitude, and replenishment not memorialization.
-P
I do the cool-down dinner afterwards too. Nice I am not alone here, but that is for serenity, gratitude, and replenishment not memorialization.
-P
Long-time lurker here. I used to, but not anymore. I've been into this for almost a decade now, and at first I had a spreadsheet of when, where, with whom, and how much. But after a while, I realized it's pointless. It doesn't add anything to the experience. I'm doing this for its thrill and satisfaction, and that feeling and rush is more important to me than keeping count. But of course opinions may very.
Little Black Book you say?? Yes, I still have mine... Fond Memories,,, one day, when she was having "one of those days" my ex ,,, blurted out ... who the hell is Zelda.... I informed her the truth,,, There was no such person as Zelda at that number and did she read all of my private little black book?? She never peeked or asked again..
Joe
Considering she asked about Zelda...you can assume she made it all the way to "Z"....or the last page.
Well after meeting quite a few SPs, by now, my understanding is :
If I had a great time, I will remember her. Of course I don't remember all the details of every meeting.
But I remember the important parts (to me, that's the person I meet).
If I know I've met someone but can't remember her, then I know it is pointless going back.
If I had a great time, I will remember her. Of course I don't remember all the details of every meeting.
But I remember the important parts (to me, that's the person I meet).
If I know I've met someone but can't remember her, then I know it is pointless going back.
I have been drawn to your ... mind... in multiple posts on PERB, but I am wondering if in this case your stated position is as solid where it concerns delightfully personal memories (esp. in the minds of men) compared with settings where any human with zero vested interest as mere passers-by were wooed into court to testify as to
(a) Whether the light was green
(b) Whether car A remained fully in his lane
(c) Whether the cop could be heard to identify himself clearly as such beFORE demanding that the bad guy stop
Not only that, but many of those lengthy and delightful reviews may be continuations of pleasant readings and expectations begun near the start of the research period.
If everybody says: "she's remarkably firm, and those nipples are like aroused erasers" then it is a fair expectation that this reviewer is likely to experience the very same thing when he visits.
(but in general human terms I definitely accept that, say, eyewitness testimony is about the least reliable (vs. forensics, etc.) )
(* so what they are suggesting in school is NOT wrong)
From what I understand, memories associated with emotion may feel more vivid and accurate, but, in terms of content, they don't tend to be more accurate than "normal" memories. At least, thats what current research shows.
I like your style but it's hard to not get emotionally attached to the one(s) that give you that real loving experience.
Suggesting that a shorter review is “more accurate” than a longer one is a rather short sighted and unrefined conclusion to make.
The reason “average” people recall so much with such great accuracy is more likely because of the intense interest in the subject matter AND because the human brain is best wired to recall a chain of events (as opposed to a disparate set of facts).
Omitting a detail, such as a mouse “forgetting” a path to his cheese is a matter of survival. A bear chasing you that is stopped by a patch of oil becomes a vital thing for you to remember to deal with future such encounters. Long music pieces are examples of memorized chains that cannot tolerate a single mistake. Programming is another example. Cooking. Screwing. Same.
Long reviews can certainly be summarized into shorter missives and still include salient facts (ie. following an 80/20 rule - 20% of the content contains the sufficient material for 80% of readers). Long reviews can be utterly useless if schilly writers waste words gushing over their purchase and omit things like cost, CBJ vs BBBJ, age, and so on.
The reason “average” people recall so much with such great accuracy is more likely because of the intense interest in the subject matter AND because the human brain is best wired to recall a chain of events (as opposed to a disparate set of facts).
Omitting a detail, such as a mouse “forgetting” a path to his cheese is a matter of survival. A bear chasing you that is stopped by a patch of oil becomes a vital thing for you to remember to deal with future such encounters. Long music pieces are examples of memorized chains that cannot tolerate a single mistake. Programming is another example. Cooking. Screwing. Same.
Long reviews can certainly be summarized into shorter missives and still include salient facts (ie. following an 80/20 rule - 20% of the content contains the sufficient material for 80% of readers). Long reviews can be utterly useless if schilly writers waste words gushing over their purchase and omit things like cost, CBJ vs BBBJ, age, and so on.
OK, I will (accept blindly, for my not knowing anything related) that general premise. But, in the seeming court system I used as an example, there is a need for precision.
When men are reporting on delightful experiences with women, the range of accuracy expands to something not unlike in the game of horse shoes.
If a woman assembles enough reviews here... it won't matter whose hand was assessing firm, large handfuls... and the relative generalization that is "she kisses with genuine affection" will be approximated so repeatedly, from one review to another, that it will be expected as a trait of the one reviewed.
(and one's actual experience need land only near to that range of what's then expected to please most reviewers)
If women of PERB were all toasters... then the reviews here would have a more discerning and demanding tone to them, and they would more blatantly compare one to another.
But as the general pattern of repetitive behavior here is to research a considerable amount, and then to be drawn most toward those who would please you a great deal, there is a non-scientific aspect to PERB reviews which leans heavily toward the positive, because of the research done prior.
If this were 1975, and we were all dialing the phone numbers associated with the black-on-yellow silhouettes in the Yellow Pages, then our experiences would be more random... AND reviews would be less positive, (if there were a place for those reviews to be posted and referenced anywhere in the first place).
Toaster reviews back then would also be more random than they are today... because of the effect of online reviews available to us.
It's just that toaster experiences aren't as far from the center in either direction as can be the experiences derived from PERB.
SO, in the end, precise memory isn't as on-trial in PERB reviews as is a generally positive experience ... and perhaps the effect of merely reading that in print gives a boost to both male writer and reader, and perhaps a jolt of some sort (in either direction) to the reviewee. (I sense the more authentic and sincere a provider is, the less affected she is by reviews written about her - but that would be a long-term trend, and not a stance on short-term highlights or lowlights relating to reviews)
(of course one must make allowances for some fool who writes a review of an encounter fully 6 months after it happened, and at that point cites BBBJTCIM, when by then he is mostly just guessing at what he remembers )
(and for the record, I'd be one to write lengthy-enough reviews, though without the detailed specifics relating to what went where during the encounter) (their substance would be more about ambience and attitute than a play-by-play)
