Massage Adagio

The Clash Of Generations

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,268
263
83
In a variety of different areas, the Baby Boom generation created, advanced, or preserved policies that made American institutions less dynamic. In a recent report the American Enterprise Institute looked at issues including housing, work rules, higher education, law enforcement, and public budgeting, and found a consistent pattern: The political ascendancy of the Boomers brought with it tightening control and stricter regulation, making it harder to succeed in America. This lack of dynamism largely hasn’t hurt Boomers, but the mistakes of the past are fast becoming a crisis for younger Americans.

…Boomers didn’t only make rules that nudge young people out of homeownership. They also made new rules restricting young people’s employment. Laws and rules requiring workers to have special licenses, degrees, or certificates to work have proliferated over the past few decades. And while much of this rise came before Boomers were politically active, instead of reversing the trend, they extended it.

...The most glaring example of this growth in regulation and control is also the easiest one to pin on Baby Boomers: the incredible rise in incarceration rates. Even though murder rates are today at the same levels they were in the 1950s, the imprisoned share of the population is higher in America than in any country other than North Korea. We imprison a larger share of the population than authoritarian countries such as Turkmenistan and China.

…Making these payments will require fiscal austerity, through either higher taxes or lower alternative spending. Younger Americans will bear the burdens of the Baby Boomer generation, whether in smaller take-home pay or more potholes and worse schools.

Furthermore, the basic demographic balance sheet is getting worse all the time, increasing the relative burden on young people. Working-age Americans are dying off in alarming numbers.

…The odds of a 32-year-old dying have risen by 24 percent in the past five years, even as death rates among older Americans are about stable. Baby Boomers are living longer even as the workers who pay for their pensions are dying from an epidemic of drug overdose, suicide, car accidents, and violence.

How long before the young realize they’ve had their future stolen from them by the baby boomers? The answer to this question will determine your defined benefit pension, social security and medicare benefits.

...the young will choose monetization to finance the shortfalls and debts the boomers have bequeathed them as the case gains political credibility through the rise of MMT...(MMT refers to "Modern Monetary Theory", essentially money printing and distribution in social programs.)

In 1960, Friedrich Hayek predicted in The Constitution of Liberty “that most of those who will retire at the end of the century will be dependent on the charity of the younger generation. And ultimately not morals but the fact that the young supply the police and the army will decide the issue: concentration camps for the aged unable to maintain themselves are likely to be the fate of an old generation whose income is entirely dependent on coercing the young.” It hasn’t turned out that way at all—a salutary warning that it is much easier to identify generational conflicts of interest than to anticipate correctly the political form they will take.

source: https://global-macro-monitor.com/2019/06/30/the-clash-of-generations-is-here/
 

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,415
1,304
113
Victoria
Does this thread mean that if you are over 25, to work at McDonalds you need an University Degree?
 

sybian

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2014
3,650
999
113
Kamloops B.C.
Does this thread mean that if you are over 25, to work at McDonalds you need an University Degree?
Sounds like it......
Yes it does sound like it.....it also sounds like someone needs to point the finger at an entire generation , because of their current circumstances.
Yes the Boomers had great advantages, and influenced an entire economy....there are advantages in this generation as well.

Suck it up princess, cut your hair, and get a job....try looking forward at the place you want to be in life, instead of looking at all those who have supposedly screwed it up for you.
Prove too yourself, and everyone else, your Mamma didn't raise no whining shirker.
 

johnnydepth

Average Sized Member
Nov 14, 2015
1,642
452
83
winnipeg
You can't blame an entire generation for government decisions that are out of their control. The truth is more and more people today are working through their 60's , 70's and beyond because the younger generation is unable to support them like they did for past generations. Again, only the government and capitalist society to blame. Fortunately by the time the next couple of generations come along countries like the United States will likely be gone. Every great nation falls sooner or later. By its very nature it can't be sustained.
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,268
263
83
As an aside, the Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform case before the Supreme Court of Canada is referred to parliament to restore the use of the Bank of Canada to its original purpose, by exercising its public statutory duty and responsibility.

In essence, the Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform want the Bank of Canada to provide interest-free loans to the federal, provincial, and municipal governments, as provided for in the Bank of Canada Act. This money would be used to finance public expenditures whenever there is a budgetary deficit. Apparently, the federal government used to borrow interest-free (to at least some extent) from the Bank of Canada up until 1974. At present, governments borrow all of the necessary money (apart from any bonds they may sell to the public) from private banks at the going rate of interest. Canadians are economically burdened with the resultant debt-servicing charges because the Bank of Canada does not make use of its prerogatives in the interests of the Canadian public. The case was prosecuted by Rocco Galati, who is widely considered to be Canada's top constitutional lawyer.

From my perspective, saving the taxpayer large sums of money and/or preserving the country from an increase in public indebtedness via the issuance of interest-free money from the Bank of Canada is certainly a good thing. However, such a reform of the system does not address the fundamental problem with the present financial and economic orders: the chronic lack of consumer buying power. The macroeconomic gap between prices and incomes, which is primarily caused by how real capital (machines and equipment) are financed and how their costs are then accounted for under existing conventions, is THE issue which needs to be addressed. In the main, the present system deals with the gap by filling it with additional debt-money from the private banking system in the form of public, corporate, and consumer debts.

In connection with this particular lawsuit and as a further clarification of the point just made, institutions exist to serve the interests of individuals, not the other way around. That is, individual consumers must control financial policy, not the government, the state, or the private banks. There is no point in "restoring the right to create and issue money to the state" if the state is then going to control the purposes for which producer and consumer credit are to be issued.

If you like what you've read here I urge you to write these people:

justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca; andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca; Jagmeet.Singh@parl.gc.ca; maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca

....and anybody else you know and offer your support.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts