I self identify as a socially progressive, social democratic, globalist and environmentalist. I am progressive because I believe in freedom and don't support inequality, discrimination or judgement based on gender, sexuality, ethnicity, race, age or religious/spiritual belief (so actually very close to true social libertarianism, except I believe in the state limiting, controlling and subverting offence and violence whether through speech, acts of violence or potential acts of violence like gun possession). I am a social democrat because I believe in a democracy thats primary purpose is to elect a government that supports the needs of its citizenary over individual desires and promotes economic equality (a social welfare state). I am a globalist because I believe as technology has expanded our 'reach' or 'range, the idea of the nation state has become antiquated, and our responsibility must reflect that increased connection and relationship to the whole world (examples would be that I believe in environmental and humanitarian responsibility including the free flow of refugees over the individual need of Canada). I am an environmentalist because I put the needs of the environment over the desires of the economy (so I don't support consumptionism or support the recent NEB ruling that simply states that the economic interest of the pipeline expansion supercedes the potential catastrophic damage a marine spill would create).
so you basically don't believe in reality :jaded:
gun possession isn't a violent act
anymore than owning a knife or bat is
promoting equality through a social welfare state isn't the same as a system where everyone has the same opportunity
where those that need a hand up receive one, which is a very small part of any society
you're suggesting just giving people things/money cause they exist
which runs counter to basic human behaviour
your delusions spouting Trudeau's post national state, again, runs against basic human behaviour/reality
or haven't you been paying attention to history/the here and now
people are selfish/territorial/insatiable
they don't like to share, history repeatably proves that out
it continues today, everywhere
don't support consumption, lol
as long as it's someone else giving it up, right?
why do you own a device that enables you to connect to the internet?
you don't own anything with oil in it?
you don't own a car?
a tv?
a radio?
clothes?
a home?
toilet?
shower?
don't go to the doctor?
never went to school?
lol
and all that tech? making your make believe world
it runs on Unicorn farts? was developed with Unicorn farts? lol
love the one about letting people wander anywhere in the world
more people=more carbon
if you really cared about the environment
you'd be supporting the exact opposite
letting them stay where they are, the only problem with them is they live in a overpopulated area where resources are scarce
thought you were against consumption?
so you want them to move where they will be able to consume more? :jaw:
you're like all typical delusional LEFTISTS
you're unwilling to walk the talk
you spout off, like your hero Trudeau
so guess you're going to give up your house to a refugee
your car to the kidney car program
your computer/phone/tv/furniture/dangerous knives to goodwill
or you already have none of these things?
where should we send your mail?
3rd spruce on the right in the Great Bear Rain forest?
. The Soy must be strong with this one because i sense lots of phyto-estrogenic tenancies. maybe Ze can open Zis eyes to how the real world works and the dangers of socialism and communism, because Ze has absolutely no idea about the ideologies Ze is speaking about, so Zis arguments are completely nonsensical. At present it basically sounds like Zis needs a compass because Ze doesn't know whether the present liberal party is Left, Right, north, on the moon, or up Zis' arse.
