Dudley Do-Right

[Spraycan99]

Is it just me or does there seem to be a lot of "Dudley Do-Rights" on here lately.
"Don't do this" or "don't talk about this" or "let's all work together to help one another out".
Sorry but all it is is johns buying sex from hookers. Call yourself a "hobbyist" or a "service provider" but it still boils down to the sale of sex.
All these armchair Sherlock Holmes guys trying to play detective over what the police might or might not do is hilarious. If you want to play, you risk the chance you might have pay.

Guess what I'm saying is relax and cut all the drama.

*steps down off my soapbox*

 

[Jethro Bodine]

All these armchair Sherlock Holmes guys trying to play detective over what the police might or might not do is hilarious. If you want to play, you risk the chance you might have pay.

Guess what I'm saying is relax and cut all the drama.

If this is some kind of commentary on the thread I started on Diamonds let me explain.
As someone with a little bit of "expertise" in how these things are viewed by the authorities, I was simply stating my opinion that it might not be the best idea for Diamonds and the ladies to be advertising on BP under the "Escorts" category while operating on an MP license which prohibits certain behaviors implied by the very term "Escort".
If some view this as playing Sherlock Holmes (who isn't even a Double Naught Spy) or detective then I guess I'm guilty as charged.
I prefer to look at it as providing a bit of a public service to my other Perb members especially the newbies, who may not be up to speed on the inherent risk of visiting an MP when the cops come by to check on things.
And it might even be a helpful read for any Diamonds staff who drop by.
We all understand there is risk in participating n this hobby. What's wrong with discussing those risks and how we can reduce them.
Cheers

 

[ATM]

I agree JB. I never thought it was very smart.

 

[bowtie44]

If this is some kind of commentary on the thread I started on Diamonds let me explain.
As someone with a little bit of "expertise" in how these things are viewed by the authorities, I was simply stating my opinion that it might not be the best idea for Diamonds and the ladies to be advertising on BP under the "Escorts" category while operating on an MP license which prohibits certain behaviors implied by the very term "Escort".
If some view this as playing Sherlock Holmes (who isn't even a Double Naught Spy) or detective then I guess I'm guilty as charged.
I prefer to look at it as providing a bit of a public service to my other Perb members especially the newbies, who may not be up to speed on the inherent risk of visiting an MP when the cops come by to check on things.
And it might even be a helpful read for any Diamonds staff who drop by.
We all understand there is risk in participating n this hobby. What's wrong with discussing those risks and how we can reduce them.
Cheers

Well Said Jethro:clap2:

 

[mownor]

Hear, hear, Mr. Baer

Those of us who frequent this site and some of the providers found here or discussed here have, on occasion, discovered that a lady has provided a little (or a lot!) more than usual. The reasons for this could be many. For example, over time we could have gained her trust or we could have offered more $ than is common for a simple massage. If that happens it is often a result of the lady making that decision on her own and her landlord might not know or approve of such activity, certainly LE wouldn't. If we find such a gem stepping "one toke over the line", standing on the roof of a building downtown and shouting our good luck to all and sundry could cause some problems. Announcing service with names and places in this forum is tantamount to the same thing and it can do nothing but bring harm to those people who help us out from time to time. That's why we have PMs. If you don't care about that SP, that's your lookout but you should try to be kind to others. If a person can't figure that out then he needs adult supervision. IMHO, M.

 

[humper1]

Hear, hear, Mr. Baer

Those of us who frequent this site and some of the providers found here or discussed here have, on occasion, discovered that a lady has provided a little (or a lot!) more than usual. The reasons for this could be many. For example, over time we could have gained her trust or we could have offered more $ than is common for a simple massage. If that happens it is often a result of the lady making that decision on her own and her landlord might not know or approve of such activity, certainly LE wouldn't. If we find such a gem stepping "one toke over the line", standing on the roof of a building downtown and shouting our good luck to all and sundry could cause some problems. Announcing service with names and places in this forum is tantamount to the same thing and it can do nothing but bring harm to those people who help us out from time to time. That's why we have PMs. If you don't care about that SP, that's your lookout but you should try to be kind to others. If a person can't figure that out then he needs adult supervision. IMHO, M.

Well said Sir