thought i'd stir up some drama...

Previous Thread Next Thread
V

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,489
8
38
on yer ignore list
C

captain_jack

Member
Apr 11, 2014
76
0
6
I dont care wheather he is still innocent in the eyes of the law. You kill a kid by being a bitch and driving drunk you deserve to have more than just your thumbs cut off..
 
P

Perbster99

Member
Jun 5, 2009
98
1
18
screwtape1963 said:
He is ALLEGED to have killed a kid while driving drunk. He is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law - and is fully entitled to have that trial to determine what happened and the extent of his guilt. ANYTHING else is mob rule and injustice. Period.

For both the man AND QUITE POSSIBLY HIS WIFE (who had nothing whatsoever to do personally with whatever happened to the child) to be attacked and injured -- when the man has in fact been duly charged and is awaiting trial in the normal course of proper process -- is completely inexcusable. There isn't even the shadow of an excuse that "well otherwise he has escaped justice entirely because he has never even been investigated/charged by the police"...
Click to expand...
Right and no guilty person has ever gotten off on a technicality? How about the RCMP officer who was driving drunk and after the accident left the scene to go home and have a few drinks so that they could not prove that he was drunk while driving?
 
westwoody

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,677
7,247
113
Westwood
Wasn't that RCMP one of the airport foursome? Which would mean he actually was involved in two suspicious deaths.
 
F

Fullhouse

Well-known member
Nov 6, 2007
1,196
109
63
Vancouver - Richmond
westwoody said:
Wasn't that RCMP one of the airport foursome? Which would mean he actually was involved in two suspicious deaths.
Click to expand...
Yes, one and the same.

He was the officer in command of that foursome -----Corporal Benjamin (Monty) Robinson --- that tasered the Polish immigrant, Robert Dziekanski, on Oct. 14th. 2007.

He has also been charged with perjury regarding an inquest into the death of Dziekanski, with the trial set for later this year.

He was charged with obstruction of justice and found guilty in July 2012 relating to the incident where he hit a motorcycle rider in Oct. 2008 that killed him.

He was on leave from the RCMP since the taser at VCR with full pay, benefits and raises and never even had to show himself at any detachment until right after he was found guilty of obstruction in 2012........when he 'resigned'.....So he was on paid vacation for 5 years..... it doesn't get any better than that......what a scum bag.
 
S

silenceisgolden

Member
Sep 8, 2009
71
25
18
Perbster99 said:
Right and no guilty person has ever gotten off on a technicality? How about the RCMP officer who was driving drunk and after the accident left the scene to go home and have a few drinks so that they could not prove that he was drunk while driving?
Click to expand...
So, your "logic" is that since some guilty persons have gotten off on a technicality, it is acceptable for some other persons (persons who have been charged and are awaiting trial) to be subject to vigilante violence prior to their trial? Do I have that right?
 
P

Perbster99

Member
Jun 5, 2009
98
1
18
silenceisgolden said:
So, your "logic" is that since some guilty persons have gotten off on a technicality, it is acceptable for some other persons (persons who have been charged and are awaiting trial) to be subject to vigilante violence prior to their trial? Do I have that right?
Click to expand...
I don't claim to know all the facts here but your example would be valid for a complicated criminal case. Not a case where a person who was drunk got into this accident where there's no doubt he was the driver and killed the child.

What possible defence could he have? the Only reason for Pleading innocent would be to get off on a technicality or reduce the charges.
 
Cami Parker

Cami Parker

Beautiful Blonde Dream Girl
Mar 7, 2013
2,105
59
63
Vancouver, BC
www.camiparker.ca
That's why I don't drive.... Just in case. Even if it wasn't my fault in any way, I still couldn't live with myself. The guilt would eat me alive every single day of my life...

travellor said:
He has to live with the fact that he killed a child with his vehicle for the rest of his life!! Don't you think that type of guilt is bad enough??? I think it is common for people to receive lenient sentences for that reason.

I believe people who commit vehicular manslaughter never receive a tough enough sentence. Laura Bush, Ted Kennedy, Matthew Broderick..... the list goes on and on. Ranker
Click to expand...
 
Pantherdash

Pantherdash

Panther
Apr 2, 2007
2,561
235
63
Downtown Vancouver
Fullhouse said:
He was on leave from the RCMP since the taser at VCR with full pay, benefits and raises and never even had to show himself at any detachment until right after he was found guilty of obstruction in 2012........when he 'resigned'.....So he was on paid vacation for 5 years..... it doesn't get any better than that......what a scum bag.
Click to expand...
Oh, it does get better...because he 'resigned' and wasn't fired by the RCMP, he also gets to keep and collect a very healthy pension! :pound:

Truly, a scum bag indeed!

Panther
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Previous Thread Next Thread
Vancouver Escorts
Top Bottom