Updated article basically laying out how most of us knew about Target Canada's troubles: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/target-s-launch-into-canada-a-multifaceted-failure-1.2901789
A new record - 245 words in one sentence!Personally I think target failed because it was not very inviting even though it was modeled identical to USA stores that have been around for decades, in Canada they always felt drabby such as they never looked open at nights and when you walked in it had no atmosphere that you were going to get a deal because the layout was always compared to Walmart and a smart businessman knew that the crossborder Target customer were already going to check them out but they are a small percentage compared to possible new non crossboarder Walmart shoppers that you are trying to sway into Target customers which would have to be the case to succeed as per example they hid the food section at the back which when you walked in nothing was there to make you buy something out of impulse and make you go in further looking for a deal,Starbucks up front not Macdonalds ,Starbuck customers don't need to go to Walmart and Walmart customers can't afford to go to Starbucks hence Starbucks in Target were never busy,but in the USA Targets they have all sort of deals at the front entrance of cheap fast foods from pizza huts to hot dogs like Costco hmmm they seem to do good in Canada my take anyhow,just sad to see them go + liked Zellers too, kinda reminded me of Walmart ,deals by the door,clothing + electronics at the back,bright lit up at night sound familiar!
Thats the NDP for you...yes let's up the minimum wage to $15...yeah and everything else goes up 20% or more to pay for the wage slave increase.Agreed 100%.
To add to the comment on the NDP .......... here in BC they are aggressively running a campaign to increase the minimum wage to $15 an hour. That will definitely help business?
Cannot not ever figure out why socialists are always so stupid.
Yep! It indeed will help business. When Seattle raised their minimum wage, they experienced a boost to the economy and had the fastest rate of small business establishment in the US.To add to the comment on the NDP .......... here in BC they are aggressively running a campaign to increase the minimum wage to $15 an hour. That will definitely help business?
I would prefer money being redistributed to the working class than redistributed to companies and the wealthy, which seems to increasingly be the current state of affairs.Socialists tend to think they have the majority of the working class, and to some extent maybe they do.........They get into power and spend all the money on social programs.
Eventually doubling back on their promises they can't possibly afford to keep....Still holding onto the impossible dream of unlimited funds coming from the very wallets of the people that voted for them.They then attack the wealthy ,who employ these people, or own the very businesses that support the foundation of the economy they are trying to manage.
They figure if your not a team player....You don't belong.
Maybe more people would vote for you....If you didn't treat us like assholes...Thats my analysis.
Arhhh no its called inflation and small businesses will just employ less or give less hours to make up for the loss.Yep! It indeed will help business. When Seattle raised their minimum wage, they experienced a boost to the economy and had the fastest rate of small business establishment in the US.
Raising the minimum wage helped the economy as it gave a lot of people money to spend. It was good for business. Paying people more than a subsistence level income actually helps the economy, and doesn't lead to high levels of unemployment... as is claimed by some.
Henry Ford realised that when he raised the wage for his factory workers way above the standard some 100 years ago, enabling his workers to truly become consumers.
The better question, in my opinion is this: Since when has it become the norm in a free and democratic society for citizens to have to ask "society" (i.e. "the government") for PERMISSION to do things?The question to ask is this:
Should society allow business to operate solely for the benefit of the business owners or should society expect business owners to provide value to society as a whole in return for being allowed to operate?
An example could be that of a hypothetical business owner owning 7 or 8 Tim Hortons and offering so low wages that he cannot entice sufficient local employees to work for him. He then petitions the government to be allowed to bring in temporary foreign workers to run his restaurants at rock bottom wages. The restaurants provide no benefit to Canadian society, no employment, no tangible goods & no foreign exchange.
Should we facilitate such a business model that is a parasite on society for the benefit of one citizen? Or, by denying access to non-citizen workers does society force business to choose business models that support the broader society?
The larger problem is that somebody actually has to make real income in order to buy all the goods and services that business wants to sell, but wages have not been growing in line with the economy for decades. This has been facilitated by the central banks trying to stimulate the economy by reducing interest rates to essentially zero so that the lack of income growth has been offset by borrowing to continue the drive for growth.
But people can only carry so much debt before servicing the interest on it consumes any meager gains in income. So the economy stalls. At that point you have three options: hold the course and get stagnation (as seen in Japan for 20 odd years with actual deflation), raise interest rates and get a depression or inflate away the debt. Deflation is a business killer because the consumer attitude is "Why buy today when it will be cheaper tomorrow" and tomorrow never comes. Depression is a business killer because people just cannot buy, even if they wanted to borrow, banks are less likely to lend. Inflation isn't that bad for business because the consumer know that if I don't buy it today, it will cost more tomorrow and any debt I take on today will be paid with cheaper dollars tomorrow.
Right now, a bout of inflation with slowly rising interest is likely the least harmful way to get out of the hole that this latest round of Reaganomics has gotten us into.
Go back and read Adam Smith and see what he wrote about business owners having a moral responsibility to society. He was very aware of the potential problems of capitalism when naked greed takes over (as we see in current society). He argued that along with their freedoms, business owners had a moral responsibility to society. This is the part of capitalism that appears to have been lost and forgotten. And it will be the downfall of Western civilisation as a result.The better question, in my opinion is this: Since when has it become the norm in a free and democratic society for citizens to have to ask "society" (i.e. "the government") for PERMISSION to do things?
So according to you, a business owner should only be ALLOWED to own and operate a business if he "provides value to society as a whole" rather than just working for himself?
Wow! ... Just ... Wow!
"An example could be that of a hypothetical business owner owning 7 or 8 Tim Hortons and offering so low wages that he cannot entice sufficient local employees to work for him. He then petitions the government to be allowed to bring in temporary foreign workers to run his restaurants at rock bottom wages. The restaurants provide no benefit to Canadian society, no employment, no tangible goods & no foreign exchange."The question to ask is this:
Should society allow business to operate solely for the benefit of the business owners or should society expect business owners to provide value to society as a whole in return for being allowed to operate?
An example could be that of a hypothetical business owner owning 7 or 8 Tim Hortons and offering so low wages that he cannot entice sufficient local employees to work for him. He then petitions the government to be allowed to bring in temporary foreign workers to run his restaurants at rock bottom wages. The restaurants provide no benefit to Canadian society, no employment, no tangible goods & no foreign exchange.
Should we facilitate such a business model that is a parasite on society for the benefit of one citizen? Or, by denying access to non-citizen workers does society force business to choose business models that support the broader society?
The larger problem is that somebody actually has to make real income in order to buy all the goods and services that business wants to sell, but wages have not been growing in line with the economy for decades. This has been facilitated by the central banks trying to stimulate the economy by reducing interest rates to essentially zero so that the lack of income growth has been offset by borrowing to continue the drive for growth.
But people can only carry so much debt before servicing the interest on it consumes any meager gains in income. So the economy stalls. At that point you have three options: hold the course and get stagnation (as seen in Japan for 20 odd years with actual deflation), raise interest rates and get a depression or inflate away the debt. Deflation is a business killer because the consumer attitude is "Why buy today when it will be cheaper tomorrow" and tomorrow never comes. Depression is a business killer because people just cannot buy, even if they wanted to borrow, banks are less likely to lend. Inflation isn't that bad for business because the consumer know that if I don't buy it today, it will cost more tomorrow and any debt I take on today will be paid with cheaper dollars tomorrow.
Right now, a bout of inflation with slowly rising interest is likely the least harmful way to get out of the hole that this latest round of Reaganomics has gotten us into.





