Lost Thread??

[grusse]

Fri nite I saw a thread by Retriever, who has several fine pictorial threads currently active.

I eagerly opened it and was not disappointed by the usual high quality photos&models.

Sorry to say I can't recall the name of the thread.

Now, ther were,I think, 2 people who doubted the age of at least one model, tho' they didn't specify WHICH photo(s) they
queried, nor was any proof offered as to the girl(s) being underage.

they looked legal to me, and Retriever posted they were not under 20.

I can't find the thread so I guess it's been deleted,but I'm wondering why?

did someone come up with evidence that a model or models were underage?

was it deleted because 2 people thought someone was underage?

did Retriever delete it to avoid a hassle?

is it out there&I can't find it?

There's probably rules re trying to resurrect a banned thread,which I'm not trying to bring back one IF it's been banned.
no, I'm just asking what happened to it?

appreciate any info.

ps I thought it was good&legit, but my opinion plus $2.75 gets you on the bus.

 

[sdw]

Fri nite I saw a thread by Retriever, who has several fine pictorial threads currently active.

I eagerly opened it and was not disappointed by the usual high quality photos&models.

Sorry to say I can't recall the name of the thread.

Now, ther were,I think, 2 people who doubted the age of at least one model, tho' they didn't specify WHICH photo(s) they
queried, nor was any proof offered as to the girl(s) being underage.

they looked legal to me, and Retriever posted they were not under 20.

I can't find the thread so I guess it's been deleted,but I'm wondering why?

did someone come up with evidence that a model or models were underage?

was it deleted because 2 people thought someone was underage?

did Retriever delete it to avoid a hassle?

is it out there&I can't find it?

There's probably rules re trying to resurrect a banned thread,which I'm not trying to bring back one IF it's been banned.
no, I'm just asking what happened to it?

appreciate any info.

ps I thought it was good&legit, but my opinion plus $2.75 gets you on the bus.

I think the Mods removed the thread because it devolved into an argument between Retriever and I. The picture that I forwarded was first posted in 2010 on a private bulletin board. The picture then began to appear on various "Teen" sites in 2011.

 

[badbadboy]

Fri nite I saw a thread by Retriever, who has several fine pictorial threads currently active.

I eagerly opened it and was not disappointed by the usual high quality photos&models.

Sorry to say I can't recall the name of the thread.

Now, ther were,I think, 2 people who doubted the age of at least one model, tho' they didn't specify WHICH photo(s) they
queried, nor was any proof offered as to the girl(s) being underage.

they looked legal to me, and Retriever posted they were not under 20.

I can't find the thread so I guess it's been deleted,but I'm wondering why?

did someone come up with evidence that a model or models were underage?

was it deleted because 2 people thought someone was underage?

did Retriever delete it to avoid a hassle?

is it out there&I can't find it?

There's probably rules re trying to resurrect a banned thread,which I'm not trying to bring back one IF it's been banned.
no, I'm just asking what happened to it?

appreciate any info.

ps I thought it was good&legit, but my opinion plus $2.75 gets you on the bus.

I looked at it and IMHO a couple looked underage. I didn't say a thing about it and moved on. Apparently, I was not alone.

Its a slippery slope when you post pics on the net of females who look a little young.

BTW isn't the onus on the OP to "prove" the pics are legit not the other way around??

 

[retriever]

I think the Mods removed the thread because it devolved into an argument between Retriever and I. The picture that I forwarded was first posted in 2010 on a private bulletin board. The picture then began to appear on various "Teen" sites in 2011.

No argument. You forwarded nothing to me. You said things such as "you like to see children naked" amongst other disgusting things. A personal attack because you had no case and a sick statement from a desperate person. Such an attack on other boards would get you banned permanently.

You sling mud and bulldoze to try and make a case out of garbage. Rob suits you.

Pics on a teen site does not mean they are under age. I pick images from North American sites that are governed by strict laws.

The pics you saw were from tumblr such as. Example site:- http://sexyquintets.tumblr.com/archive

This gal is 19 but looks younger. She has done dozens of porn movies.

 

[*emmanuelle]

I looked at it and IMHO a couple looked underage. I didn't say a thing about it and moved on. Apparently, I was not alone.

Me three, dude!

 

[badbadboy]

No argument. You forwarded nothing to me. You said things such as "you like to see children naked" amongst other disgusting things. A personal attack because you had no case and a sick statement from a desperate person. Such an attack on other boards would get you banned permanently.

You sling mud and bulldoze to try and make a case out of garbage. Rob suits you.

Pics on a teen site does not mean they are under age. The pics you saw were from tumblr. Example site:- http://sexyquintets.tumblr.com/archive

This gal is 19 but looks younger. She has done dozens of porn movies.

I do think you post some pics that are oh so close to that edge retriever. FWIW I do not like having that sort of attention brought to Perb because a "collective WE" do not know who or what organization is viewing. My comfort level would be in the 20+ year old category. If in doubt, it may be best not to post. : rant off :

Not slinging mud just saying what is on my mind.

 

[retriever]

I do think you post some pics that are oh so close to that edge retriever. FWIW I do not like having that sort of attention brought to Perb because a "collective WE" do not know who or what organization is viewing. My comfort level would be in the 20+ year old category. If in doubt, it may be best not to post. : rant off :

Not slinging mud just saying what is on my mind.

These are your thoughts and are just fine. Nasty comments and personal attacks I don't accept. Keep on trucking.

 

[badbadboy]

These are your thoughts and are just fine. Nasty comments and personal attacks I don't accept. Keep on trucking.

What exactly was nasty? What was a personal attack? Good Grief.

I tempered my comments to engage you in a discussion and apparently you are not going to discuss it but will say I am the one slinging mud. It was and still is my opinion that you post pics of females whose age could be a problem on this site.

 

[retriever]

What exactly was nasty? What was a personal attack? Good Grief.

I tempered my comments to engage you in a discussion and apparently you are not going to discuss it but will say I am the one slinging mud. It was and still is my opinion that you post pics of females whose age could be a problem on this site.

What are you talking about. sdw made the comments. I never said you. Sheesh. Read more carefully man.

 

[badbadboy]

What are you talking about. sdw made the comments. I never said you. Sheesh. Read more carefully man.

Perhaps it would be a wise move to quote the correct person then retriever. The Devil is in the details.

 

[retriever]

I'm required elsewhere. I'll check in tomorrow.

 

[grusse]

holy s..t, I didn't intend for my questions to start a bun-toss.

maybe best if we all just walk away from this?