John Furlong breaks his silence...

SOURCE: http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/10/29/john-furlong-is-no-longer-biting-his-tongue/
John Furlong breaks his silence
by Jonathon Gatehouse on Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:07pm

The words come tumbling out in long sentences that pick up speed like they’re running downhill. Paragraph piled upon paragraph, with nary a breath between them. For 17 months, John Furlong has been silent about the allegations of physical and sexual abuse that have been levied against him. But now, the man who was the guiding force behind the Vancouver 2010 Olympics, says he can no longer bite his tongue. The time has come to take back his good name. And punish the journalist who has been leading the charge.

“Enough is enough. When this started, I thought this would take a week, maybe two, or a month—max—and then it would be over,” he says. “It was a ridiculous charge. It was a lie. And it was placed before the RCMP by Laura Robinson.”

Sitting in the Toronto offices of a PR firm that was formed by VANOC marketers, the 63-year-old is surrounded by mementos of his greatest professional triumph: a small model of the Olympic torch, glossy picture books, and a bright blue windbreaker with the five rings on the back. But his thoughts are of the humiliations that followed. Things have not been the same since Robinson, an Ontario-based freelance journalist, published a story in the Vancouver alt-weekly Georgia Straight in the fall of 2012, about Furlong’s distant past. The piece detailed how the Olympic chief had first come to Canada as an 18-year-old in 1969 to teach at religious schools for Aboriginal children in Burns Lake and Prince George, B.C.—a three-year sojourn that wasn’t mentioned in his official biography or memoir. Based on affidavits gathered from his former native students, the article alleged that Furlong had been a notorious teacher, meting out physical and racial abuse.


The RCMP launched an investigation. Furlong filed a defamation suit against Robinson, the paper and its editors. And in court filings, the journalist brought forward even more damaging charges about the sexual abuse of students, and assaults against one of his former wives and an ex-common-law partner. Two civil suits by former students followed. And although Furlong and his lawyer vigorously denied all the allegations, a cloud descended on his personal and professional life. “I felt like I was walking around Vancouver with a target on my chest,” says Furlong. Soon his family felt it, too. A stepson was getting into fights defending his honour at school. His grandkids were being taunted on the playground. And his children, two of whom are teachers, found themselves under constant scrutiny. Then last April, Deborah Sharp Furlong, his third wife, was killed in a car crash while they were on vacation in his native Ireland. “Get yourself into the darkest place you can go and keep going,” he says of the past year and a half. “It’s like someone took a wrecking ball to my world.”

This week, in a series of interviews, including a half-hour sit-down with Maclean’s, Furlong began the arduous task of trying to reclaim his once-sterling reputation. The RCMP, he says, have thoroughly investigated the original abuse complaint, and provided him with both written and verbal assurances that he has been cleared of all charges. (The Mounties, who took the extraordinary step of having major crime investigators from outside the province review their findings, are being more circumspect in their public pronouncements. “Our file remains open at this time,” the lead detective told Global News.)
But unwilling to wait any longer, Furlong is now stepping out from behind his lawyers, proclaiming his innocence and promising to pursue “the source of these lies.” His legal action against Robinson will be “escalated,” he says. Although just what that means is unclear. Furlong says his lawyers are reviewing a number of options, including seeking some sort of injunction against her. And while he is dropping his claim against the Georgia Straight and its editors— “I think they accepted her claims in good faith,” he says—he is also opening up new fronts in the battle. On Oct. 28, Furlong’s lawyers fired off a warning letter to the organizers of a Danish sporting conference where Robinson is scheduled to give a lecture entitled, “Truth, Lies and History: John Furlong and Canadian Sport’s Moral Vacuum.” It asked that Robinson’s talk be cancelled. “If defamatory statements are made, Mr. Furlong may bring further legal action without further notice to you,” the letter concluded.

Reached via email in Copenhagen, Robinson declined to comment on the RCMP’s apparent decision not to pursue charges against the former VANOC leader. But she again denied Furlong’s repeated claim that she was the one who initiated the investigation. “At no point did I ever give [the complainant’s] affidavit to the police, let alone report her allegations,” she wrote.

Furlong contends that Robinson is an activist, not a journalist, and needs to be stopped before she inflicts further harm. In his own court filings, he has details of three incidences from her professional past where she has made allegations of racism, sexism or abuse that were ultimately proven to be unfounded. “This is a pattern that goes back 20 years,” he says. “This person has damaged me and damaged others.” And Furlong is particularly incensed by a recent series of emails Robinson has sent to members of corporate boards that he sits on, including Canadian Tire, Whistler-Blackcomb, and Own the Podium, asking why he has been allowed to continue serving while facing such serious allegations. “There’s been this palpable harassment that won’t stop,” he says.

Robinson defends those inquiries as necessary research for her presentation. “Writing to the board members was an obvious part of my due diligence,” she wrote Maclean’s. “The paper is about the Canadian sport and business communities’ support of Furlong and their seemingly blindness toward the extreme trauma the students are suffering, not only because they continue to see Furlong deny what he did, but because they feel utterly failed by Canadians who have the power to ask him to step aside from his decision-making positions until the issues the students courageously brought up have been properly dealt with and have chosen not to do so. I could not have delivered this paper without asking the various board members what process they went through to determine that Furlong should stay on the board.”

Furlong says he has no plans to file suit against any of his accusers. He suggests the former students might have been manipulated, or are out for money. (The local Catholic diocese in northern B.C., which was also named in the civil suits, has said it has no records of two of the three litigants ever attending the school in question.) “It was a lovely school. It was a happy school,” Furlong says. “The kind of things they’re talking about, there wasn’t even a hint of that.” And he is equally at a loss to explain why his former common-law partner has resurfaced with claims of physical and sexual abuse after all these years. Although he makes it clear who he blames. “I never heard about them until Robinson brought them forward,” he says, characterizing the allegations as “outrageous lies.”

There is still no trial date set for Furlong’s defamation suit, and none of the allegations flying back and forth have been proven in court. But Furlong is now on a mission, just as committed to stopping Robinson, as she seems to be to pressing the allegations. “I’ve had 17 months in hell because of her,” he says. Social invitations have stopped. His once-lucrative business giving corporate speeches has dried up. He’s tired of avoiding people’s gazes on the streets. “The financial cost has been very high, but the human cost has been worse.”
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
Well, if these allegations were unfounded then he has every right to do what he is doing.
 

HunkyBill

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2008
1,441
176
63
I dunno why, but I always thought Furlong was an ex-mountie where as soon as he opens his mouth, shit comes out.
 
John Furlong Lawsuit: Journalist Laura Robinson Fires Back

SOURCE:http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/10/30/john-furlong-journalist_n_4179527.html

John Furlong Lawsuit: Journalist Laura Robinson Fires Back
CP | By James Keller, The Canadian Press
Posted: 10/30/2013 7:14 pm EDT | Updated: 10/30/2013 9:35 pm EDT


VANCOUVER - The freelance journalist who first wrote about abuse allegations involving former Vancouver Olympic CEO John Furlong insists it is her, not Furlong, whose reputation has been unfairly damaged, and she says she's eager to defend herself in court.

Laura Robinson wrote an article in the Georgia Straight newspaper last year that alleged Furlong verbally and physically abused students while he was a teacher in northern B.C. in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The article prompted Furlong to sue Robinson and the paper for libel.

Since the story, three people who claim to be former students, including at least one who appeared in Robinson's original article, filed lawsuits containing explosive allegations of physical and sexual abuse.

Furlong went on the offensive this week in a series of media interviews, categorically denying any wrongdoing and casting Robinson as a vindictive activist who has published false allegations as part of a personal vendetta against him.

Robinson says in a statement Wednesday that Furlong's fierce criticism of her, especially during what she described as the "onslaught" of interviews he participated in this week, has been unfair.

"I value my hard-earned reputation as a freelance investigative journalist," Robinson says in the statement released by her lawyer.

"My personal reputation, my reputation as a journalist, and my ability to earn a living have been seriously damaged by Mr. Furlong's vindictive personal attacks."


Robinson says she stands by her original article and she urged Furlong to take the steps necessary to bring the case to trial quickly.

Robinson claims Furlong is stalling the legal action. She says he has not requested a trial date or sought to interview her for oral discovery.

Robinson says her lawyers will file a motion to have the case dismissed "for want of prosecution" and to have portions of Furlong's statement of claim that "attack me personally and professionally" struck out.

But John Hunter, the lawyer representing Furlong, said in an email that an exchange of documents between parties is the normal prelude to oral discoveries, and his client has provided his list of documents to Robinson's counsel.

Hunter said he is waiting for a list of documents from Robinson, and once he has her list and has reviewed her documents, the parties will be able to schedule oral examinations.

"I have also been instructed to amend the claim against Ms. Robinson to encompass her continued campaign against Mr. Furlong and anticipate doing so shortly," said Hunter.

"I have not been advised of any potential applications by Ms. Robinson, and would be surprised if the applications you refer to are in fact filed."

Furlong said in interviews this week that the RCMP "cleared my name," pointing to a letter he received from the police in April that said investigators found no evidence to substantiate allegations by one of the complainants.

The RCMP said this week the case "remains open," which Furlong said he could not explain.

Robinson seized on the apparent discrepancy in her statement.

Hunter said he could confirm an RCMP officer this past spring advised another lawyer representing Furlong that the investigation had been concluded and no basis for the allegations had been found.

Robinson is currently in Denmark, where she made a presentation about Furlong to a conference called Play the Game.

During his media blitz, Furlong said he would be "escalating" his lawsuit against Robinson, while dropping his claims against the Georgia Straight newspaper.

He also accused Robinson of abusing the process, including additional allegations in court documents. In her statement of defence in the libel case, Robinson levelled additional allegations involving two of Furlong's former spouses that were not mentioned in her original article.

In her media statement Wednesday, Robinson insisted she had done nothing inappropriate by including those allegations in her court filings.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
"Furlong says he has no plans to file suit against any of his accusers. He suggests the former students might have been manipulated, or are out for money. (The local Catholic diocese in northern B.C., which was also named in the civil suits, has said it has no records of two of the three litigants ever attending the school in question.) “It was a lovely school. It was a happy school,” Furlong says. “The kind of things they’re talking about, there wasn’t even a hint of that.” And he is equally at a loss to explain why his former common-law partner has resurfaced with claims of physical and sexual abuse after all these years. Although he makes it clear who he blames. “I never heard about them until Robinson brought them forward,” he says, characterizing the allegations as “outrageous lies.”
This paragraph tells me all I need to know that he is guilty. If the accusers were making false allegations, then Furlong would be dropping every piece of weaponry in his nuclear arsenal on them and would not be wasting his time on journalists who understandably would be taking up the cause due to the profile of the accused and the heinous nature of the accusations.

Think about it - if people were making shit up about you and ruining your life there is absolutely no way you don't go after them. Period. He thinks that the students may have been "manipulated" into making false child abuse allegations?!?!? Really?!?! C'mon.
 

sdw

New member
Jul 14, 2005
2,187
0
0
What is telling his biography makes no mention of his 3 years there when he first came to canada
Yep 1969 to 1973 seem to have been misplaced. Amazingly enough that seems to be when he worked in a Catholic school with Aboriginal students. Those missing years are likely what peaked Ms Robinson's attention.
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
This paragraph tells me all I need to know that he is guilty. If the accusers were making false allegations, then Furlong would be dropping every piece of weaponry in his nuclear arsenal on them and would not be wasting his time on journalists who understandably would be taking up the cause due to the profile of the accused and the heinous nature of the accusations.

Think about it - if people were making shit up about you and ruining your life there is absolutely no way you don't go after them. Period. He thinks that the students may have been "manipulated" into making false child abuse allegations?!?!? Really?!?! C'mon.
Actually, there isn't anything you can do in that sort of situation, where stuff supposedly happened 30 or 40 years ago.

Just because an allegation is made does not mean it is true. It is impossible to prove one way or another since it is one persons word against another.

What you can do however is go after those who propagate the allegations, since there is evidence to follow then.
 

Pacific Coast

Banned
Jul 8, 2013
72
0
0
This paragraph tells me all I need to know that he is guilty. If the accusers were making false allegations, then Furlong would be dropping every piece of weaponry in his nuclear arsenal on them and would not be wasting his time on journalists who understandably would be taking up the cause due to the profile of the accused and the heinous nature of the accusations.

Think about it - if people were making shit up about you and ruining your life there is absolutely no way you don't go after them. Period. He thinks that the students may have been "manipulated" into making false child abuse allegations?!?!? Really?!?! C'mon.
Furlong is suing the journalist because she wrote the article he claims is libellous. What's wrong with that? As for suing those who claim he abused them, what is the point in suing someone who is impecunious?
 

sdw

New member
Jul 14, 2005
2,187
0
0
Furlong is suing the journalist because she wrote the article he claims is libellous. What's wrong with that? As for suing those who claim he abused them, what is the point in suing someone who is impecunious?
I'm sure that Ms Robinson will be poor also if Furlong was to win.
 

Pacific Coast

Banned
Jul 8, 2013
72
0
0
I'm sure that Ms Robinson will be poor also if Furlong was to win.
Whatever money she has now, she will have less at end. He's suing her to defend his reputation. I think he dropped the Georgia Straight from the lawsuit to make her fund the defence on her own. She will be far poorer win or lose. Furlong has deeper pockets.
 

Pacific Coast

Banned
Jul 8, 2013
72
0
0
The journalist published the accusations. She didn't make them.



If it's about clearing his good name what does money matter? Winning the court case should be enough.
The journalist made the accusations. The Georgia Straight published them.

As for your second point I think we agree.
 

Unpossible

A.C.A.B.
Dec 26, 2008
908
13
0
The journalist made the accusations. The Georgia Straight published them.

As for your second point I think we agree.
I decided to stay out of this. Rather than politely allow that you chose to be an asshole.

But if his goal was to persuade First Nations children of the virtues of Catholicism, he chose, say former students, a brutal way to do it.
http://www.straight.com/news/john-furlong-biography-omits-secret-past-burns-lake

what is the point in suing someone who is impecunious?
To clear yourself of their "false" accusations. What's the point of suing the middle man? Cash!!
 
So after reading a little more about the part Furlong left out of his book, it seems to be the time he was a Frontier apostle. This is a quote I could find from one of the others, who was also a Frontier Apostle

Most pioneers of the Frontier Apostolate remember their experience like it was yesterday. Most of them were barely out of university, or in the thick of their early career, when an opportunity in Canada’s Northwestern mission diocese beckoned them to leave everything behind.

“We had the time of our lives,” says Mary Jane Wirges
, an American nurse who packed up and left for Prince George, British Columbia, in 1965.Wirges would be one of more than 4,000 young volunteers who devoted a year or more of their life to support a school system built, staffed and financially supported by volunteers within a span of nearly 40 years.
“It was absolutely astonishing,” says Ronnie Lowrey, a resident of the Greater Toronto Area who left Ireland at the age of 21 for her Canadian adventure. “The sense of community was the biggest thing, for me, since I had never really been away from home.”
SOURCE: http://www.cmic.info/Default.aspx?DN=d2b5b894-33b9-458d-920a-370e054ddff2
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
To clear yourself of their "false" accusations. What's the point of suing the middle man? Cash!!
He can't sue the persons who made the accusations, since they presumably only made a complaint. Anyone can do that, even if it is unfounded, and you have no recourse against that, especially if charges are not made and you have no day in court. An accusation is made, is dropped, but the mud sticks and there is nothing you can do about it. A high percentage of these cases where accusations are made some time after the event was supposed to have happened are like this. The actionable bit comes when someone publically propagates that accusation and cannot support their claims. The accusers are not doing this, but the reporter is. That is why she is the one being sued.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
He can't sue the persons who made the accusations, since they presumably only made a complaint. Anyone can do that, even if it is unfounded, and you have no recourse against that, especially if charges are not made and you have no day in court. An accusation is made, is dropped, but the mud sticks and there is nothing you can do about it. A high percentage of these cases where accusations are made some time after the event was supposed to have happened are like this. The actionable bit comes when someone publically propagates that accusation and cannot support their claims. The accusers are not doing this, but the reporter is. That is why she is the one being sued.
The claims have not been dropped. They are still in court. Laura Robinson is reporting on the allegations. It is very, very unlikely that Furlong will be successful in any actions against her as long as she has used the terms "alleged" in her communication.

However, Furlong can most certainly seek criminal charges against his accusers if it can be proven that they are making false complaints. If they have no evidence to substantiate the complaints the RCMP would have very likely cleared this issue already. It seems that there is something that has been provided to them that is making them investigate it more.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts