Please take the time to undertand what you are reading first, and then to think out what you are trying to say before posting. Once again, this post cannot be understood, and is therefore meaningless.
Jason Kenney bans face coverings from citizenship oaths
- Thread starter HankQuinlan
- Start date
Please go here: http://charterofrights.ca/en/11_00_01
Specify which parts you think "are not suitable in this century".
Freedom of expression, perhaps?
Protection from racial discrimination?
Protection from unlawful search?
Presumption of innocence?
Please enlighten us.
Please go here: http://charterofrights.ca/en/11_00_01
Specify which parts you think "are not suitable in this century".
Freedom of expression, perhaps?
Protection from racial discrimination?
Protection from unlawful search?
Presumption of innocence?
Please enlighten us.
I think you left out the "All of the above" choice.
They are either all vague or too specific!Please go here: http://charterofrights.ca/en/11_00_01
Specify which parts you think "are not suitable in this century".
Freedom of expression, perhaps?
Protection from racial discrimination?
Protection from unlawful search?
Presumption of innocence?
Please enlighten us.
Then why do some other people know what I'm talking about? And then know how to respond my points?
At best, they are quessing what you are talking about....or they are responding to some new statement you introduced that had nothing to do with what you were responding to. Believe me, nothing you write makes any sense in the context of what you are responding to.Then why do some other people know what I'm talking about? And then know how to respond my points?
let me put it this way: everything that the charter of rights says is either 50% right or 50% wrong.
Ok, which ones are wrong and which ones are right? Can you be specific? Qualify your post, if you can. Which ones are you specifically talking about? Please list the 50% of right and the wrong, so we can understand what you might think you are talking about. If you can, in your own words, no links please, because that's cheating.let me put it this way: everything that the charter of rights says is either 50% right or 50% wrong.
Qualify your argument.
I am pretty sure that Mercyshooter can't. All I have been able to guess from his posts on politics is that he thinks we should have a very powerful central government (which somehow is only concerned about the people rather than themselves, unlike all other powerful central governments), with a much more powerful police force (sorta like a bunch of Judge Dredds), and that civil rights are simply some kind of plot to enable lazy people to get something for nothing (or to get away with crimes).
I have never yet a post where he is asked to clarify that he actually does so...he simply posts some other unintelligible statement.
One thing I have learnt in the university in Canada is that you have to do your own research. The prof will only feed you the general idea, then you'll have to find out yourselves.
Since this is an educational class, I'll give you some guidelines/questions to think about.
1. When the Charter of Rights was built, what was the population?
2. When the Charter of Rights was built, how many cultures were existed in Canada?
3. As time goes by, what is the least proportion of the government in order to pass a law? For example, currently there are 309 seats in the Members of Parliament. So, how many seats do we need at least in order to get the proposed law to pass? What's the least percentage?
There you go. Do your own research! Enjoy!
See what I mean, mymyselftheother? No answer at all. One could respond to his question with 1. Almost 30 years ago, it was about 25 million or so, compared with 35 million or so now. 2. Much the same as now, with slightly different proportions -- probably an increase in percentage of various ethnicities. 3. 50% +1.One thing I have learnt in the university in Canada is that you have to do your own research. The prof will only feed you the general idea, then you'll have to find out yourselves.
Since this is an educational class, I'll give you some guidelines/questions to think about.
1. When the Charter of Rights was built, what was the population?
2. When the Charter of Rights was built, how many cultures were existed in Canada?
3. As time goes by, what is the least proportion of the government in order to pass a law? For example, currently there are 309 seats in the Members of Parliament. So, how many seats do we need at least in order to get the proposed law to pass? What's the least percentage?
There you go. Do your own research! Enjoy!
What do we learn by doing this (no research needed)? Nothing. Does it answer your questions? No. Is it intelligible English? Yes. Does it have anything to do with your questions? No. Does it help us understand anything he is trying to get across? No.
One thing I have learnt in the university in Canada is that you have to do your own research. The prof will only feed you the general idea, then you'll have to find out yourselves.
Since this is an educational class, I'll give you some guidelines/questions to think about.
1. When the Charter of Rights was built, what was the population?
2. When the Charter of Rights was built, how many cultures were existed in Canada?
3. As time goes by, what is the least proportion of the government in order to pass a law? For example, currently there are 309 seats in the Members of Parliament. So, how many seats do we need at least in order to get the proposed law to pass? What's the least percentage?
There you go. Do your own research! Enjoy!
The Charter was "built" ????? Got an address for that ? "How many were existed in Canada" ??? "Learnt in the university in Canada" ???? What, there is only one university in Canada ?? Off hand I'd say you didn't "learnt" too much did you ?
I should have said when was the constitution act of canada created?
Now to question number 3. What is 50% + 1? We want an exact result!
This is because when they made it, they never thought about the whole country. They only think about one single individual! This means that there's no room to improve as the population grows and people's perspectives have changed. In other words, evolution doesn't exist within the Act!
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is part of the Constitution Act, and supercedes any previous constitutions.
There is no exact result required. A majority is required; the number of votes depends on the number of members present when a vote is held.
What is the point of your inane questions? You are obviously a troll or an idiot. It isn't name-calling if one of the options applies. I have tried to treat you as someone who can't express themselves well, but that is inadequate.
One thing I have learnt in the university in Canada is that you have to do your own research. The prof will only feed you the general idea, then you'll have to find out yourselves.
Since this is an educational class, I'll give you some guidelines/questions to think about.
1. When the Charter of Rights was built, what was the population?
2. When the Charter of Rights was built, how many cultures were existed in Canada?
3. As time goes by, what is the least proportion of the government in order to pass a law? For example, currently there are 309 seats in the Members of Parliament. So, how many seats do we need at least in order to get the proposed law to pass? What's the least percentage?
There you go. Do your own research! Enjoy!
