British Columbians kill the HST with 54-per-cent referendum vote Read more

luvsdaty

Well-known member
Yeah i would say this is equal to the fast cat fiasco, just a big waste of money, that got us nothing , but owing more money. Maybe they should have put that 1.6 billion in escrow( they should have known there was going to be backlash about this issue?) I guess they figured ramming it through so early into there mandate, that the people would just roll over & take it?
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,489
8
38
on yer ignore list
despite the fact that i hate the foreign poser, van der zalm so much, i have to hand it over to the old thief - he single-handedly managed the campaign that brought about the referendum

a begrudging +1 to him :thumb: :doh:
 

CJ Tylers

Retired Sr. Member
Jan 3, 2003
1,643
1
0
46
North Vancouver
^ if they had campaigned on a properly thought out HST, then none of this would've happened. The current incarnation is little more than a shifty cash grab by politicians who seemingly only know how to spend on friends or out-of-province (using provincial money, of course) endeavours.

Also, nobody MADE the gov't waste all that money on trying to fight the anti-hst campaign... imagine the savings if they'd only matched what the anti-hst campaign spent. No, vanderzalm isn't responsible for the wasted money...the BC Liberals are.

They are an idealogically driven group that will intentially make poor financial decisions in order to support their "vision", or discredit their detractors or opponents (such as, the NDP). How people like that can be considered good for BC, good for the economy...and good for the average person, I don't know. I imagine, if we really delved into it, we'd find that their financial track record is worse than the NDP's (yes, and that is saying alot). They're just better at hiding it or redirecting blame.

These damn liberals have really pissed me off this time.... I'm not actually opposed to a well thought out, well balanced HST... but they've really royally screwed the pooch with this one. :|
 

luvsdaty

Well-known member
EXACTLY, the rich voted for it, because they want to get richer. Will they share any of that wealth??????:pound: The 1-2 % of the population that has the money wouldn't hesitate one second to screw us in the ass, & some how manage to get us too believe that this is what we really wanted!
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,112
1,079
113
Upstairs
It's truly sad that 55% of the populace bought into the utter nonsense and lies being spouted by VanderZalm, Dix, Tieleman and the rest of the YES side. They reacted in a very emotional and knee-jerk way to being lied to by Campbell and Falcon. Part of me can't blame them for this. Campbell was a total cocksucker who fucked up the chance to have an intelligent debate on the issue and then fucks off to London England. I also do blame the NDP and the others for making this a patently political argument, rather than an economic one. They took advantage of the populace, their emotions and quite frankly, their lack of understanding of something as complicated as this issue and whipped them into a frenzy. I am sorry, but anyone with even one ounce of economic education or tax knowledge was firmly on the side of the HST. The FightHST side's own position and discussion documents were shown to be outright frauds, and the media didn't or wouldn't report fairly on the issue.

I find fault with these assclown because while they claim to care about the province, they care more about getting elected. The HST's a better tax pure and simple, but years of electoral failure were too much for them to bear and they jumped at the chance champion an issue they truly don't believe in, but one that might get them elected. They played and preyed on the poor and the less educated. The breakdown of the vote paralleled this. Support for the HST was highest in the areas were education and per capita income were the highest. Support for the old system was highest in Surrey and other low income/high immigrant/low advanced education rate areas. This was an emotional vote, not an intellectual one. Dix was celebrating like he won this personally the other day, he should be ashamed for showing a total lack of leadership and a complete reliance on political brinkmanship. Shouldn't be too surprised I guess, his mentors Glen Clark and Moe Sihota never saw a lie that won them votes that they didn't love.
And there you have one of the prime reasons the tax was defeated. Not because of what RC stated, but how he stated it.

The incredible, arrogance, condescending attitude towards anyone not thinking his way and the certain superiority towards those who would dare not buy into the fear mongering of the government. And, incredibly people like that still don't get there was an issue bigger than the tax and bigger than BC.
 

Hoops

Active member
Jul 17, 2005
1,044
7
38
Did you know the average IQ is 100? Which means an awful lot of people are in the two digit category.

For this reason alone, democracy can create a truly backwards society.
Wow! So do you think that only those of us with an iq over 100 should be allowed to vote?
I don't. I believe in our democratic ideals.
 

Pirate Code

Banned
May 18, 2011
148
0
0
Sounds a little Hitlerish when you start saying that you have to have at least an iq of 100 to be able to vote?:confused:
I said no such thing and believe that democracy is the best system humans have come up with thusfar. It's just sad there are so many stupid people out there.

I would not have made the comment had it not been for the obvious fact that many, many of the 'yes' voters chose yes 'to send a message' to the Liberals. This reason is so incredibly foolish!
If, after careful research and consideration of all consequences of both sides, one chose to vote yes due precisely to their own situation, fine! But to do so, flippantly, in this punitive way is akin to cutting ones nose off to spite ones face.

I'll be bitterly laughing when I hear yes voters complain about losing jobs and government services they need due to the re-introduction of the PST/GST. I hope our idiot leaders figure out something quick. My family may lose our livelihood over this, and I'm not looking forward to the fallout.

A fallout that will cost us billions--- to do something that could easily be done at election time.
 
Last edited:

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,040
44
48
EXACTLY, the rich voted for it, because they want to get richer. Will they share any of that wealth??????:pound: The 1-2 % of the population that has the money wouldn't hesitate one second to screw us in the ass, & some how manage to get us too believe that this is what we really wanted!
I did not know that 46% of the voters (about 1.6 million in total) who took part in the referendum are considered "rich". I guess you learn something new everyday...
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,040
44
48
A fallout that will cost us billions--- to do something that could easily be done at election time.
Yeah but we sure did teach those damn politicians a lesson, I am pretty sure none of them will dare lie to us again.;) I can't wait to see the next budget to find out what spending cuts we have in store.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,112
1,079
113
Upstairs
Yeah but we sure did teach those damn politicians a lesson, I am pretty sure none of them will dare lie to us again.;) I can't wait to see the next budget to find out what spending cuts we have in store.
Well- they can start with slashing MLA salaries by 30%,
Cabinet Ministers by another 25%,
All senior bureaucrats by 40%,
All government travel budgets by 50%,
MLA office budgets by 25%
All pensions of politicians eliminated - they can purchase RRSP's like a lot of us have to.
Slash BC Hydro and BC Ferry and all other Crown Corp board salaries by 50%.
Suspend all bonuses within Crown Corporations.
Suspend and review all subsidies to any industries with an eye to eliminating them. If a business can't operate without subsidies, let it fend for itself. It's not government's job to keep alive bad business models.
Freeze salaries across the board for all government employees - nurses, teachers, civic workers, etc.

There must be other places to cut before going to the threat of cutting medical, schooling or policing.


But I'll bet none of those cuts listed above will even be looked at, except for freezing salaries of the teachers and civic workers.
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,040
44
48
But I'll bet none of those cuts listed above will even be looked at, except for freezing salaries of the teachers and civic workers.
Agreed. It'll be stuff like funding for special needs children, the mentally ill, addiction recovery and the elderly that will be cut. In other words, the more vulnerable segments of our society will be the hardest hit.
 

twoblues

New member
Apr 25, 2006
816
2
0
North Vancouver
Well- they can start with slashing MLA salaries by 30%,
Cabinet Ministers by another 25%,
All senior bureaucrats by 40%,
All government travel budgets by 50%,
MLA office budgets by 25%
All pensions of politicians eliminated - they can purchase RRSP's like a lot of us have to.
Of course, the problem when you start to attack politician benefits and salaries, is you make it an even more unappealing job than it already is.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,112
1,079
113
Upstairs
Of course, the problem when you start to attack politician benefits and salaries, is you make it an even more unappealing job than it already is.
Yeah, because we're getting the best and brightest now.

Even though I think most politicians are scum, who are in it for whatever they can get - there would be no shortage of takers if there was no pay.

They want power, perks, connections and all the underhanded stuff that gets them the real money.
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
Of course, the problem when you start to attack politician benefits and salaries, is you make it an even more unappealing job than it already is.
Yeah it is such a shitty job....making $100,00+ a year + a solid gold pension plan along with expense accounts + an adminastritive assistant who does 80% of your work for you....though I highly doubt an MLA ever breaks a sweat a or skins a knuckle in the course of a "days work".....not to mention the portion of their annual salary that is tax exempt.Not to mention the travel allowances as well as the accomodations they get in the provincial capital that are "needed" as they have to be able to attend the legislature but their electoral districts are on the other side of the province........yeah that is such a shitty job.

On the flip side of the coin it is the same in Alberta and every other province.......we need a grassroots movement to trim the fat that these hogs are stuffing themselves off at the trough.

SR
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,040
44
48
Yeah it is such a shitty job....making $100,00+ a year + a solid gold pension plan along with expense accounts + an adminastritive assistant who does 80% of your work for you....though I highly doubt an MLA ever breaks a sweat a or skins a knuckle in the course of a "days work".....not to mention the portion of their annual salary that is tax exempt.Not to mention the travel allowances as well as the accomodations they get in the provincial capital that are "needed" as they have to be able to attend the legislature but their electoral districts are on the other side of the province........yeah that is such a shitty job.
That may be true in some cases but these people also live under a pretty big microscope. Imagine trying to poon when you are a MP or MLA.
 

Ray

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2005
1,254
347
83
vancouver
though I highly doubt an MLA ever breaks a sweat a or skins a knuckle in the course of a "days work".
Not all jobs require you to break a sweat or skin a knuckle. Some people achieve higher learning so they don't have to do those things.
Not saying politicians are higher educated, but 'white collar' work doesn't require blood and sweat.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,112
1,079
113
Upstairs
That may be true in some cases but these people also live under a pretty big microscope. Imagine trying to poon when you are a MP or MLA.
They don't have to - they're too busy screwing us.

They do all that stuff in other places - like Hawaii. And we never find out unless they get arrested for drunk driving. Even then it's covered up.
 
Vancouver Escorts