I think that's partly because he's never had a majority and has not really been able to push through the real Conservative agenda. If there's a bet to be made, I'd put a shit load of money on another Conservative minortiy.I don't think that harper has fucked up too bad.
Not voting is exactly what the Tories want and all of the other parties don't. I will be voting and I think it should be required by law.I am actually more pissed off that we are once again on the hook for an approx $250 - $300M to pay for the fourth election in seven years.
Question voters need to ask themselves is if this election is warranted or not and vote accordingly.
Not voting is exactly what the Tories want and all of the other parties don't. I will be voting and I think it should be required by law.
Disagree completely. The Tories gloaded the opposition into an election by presenting a budget that pleases no one (except may be the NDP but Layton did not want to appear as weak). They think the timing is right to try and get a majority. What they didn't count on is the population's lack of appetitie for another election.Obviously the opposition parties were the ones to blame for this one. IMHO the Tories did put out a new budget to appeal to everyone's needs. The other parties are basically looking for a way to stop any positive momentum the Tories may have gained.
I don't find that at all obvious. That is the spin the Conservatives engineered, though.Obviously the opposition parties were the ones to blame for this one.
I often think that people should have to pass some common-sense general knowledge test before they are allowed to vote (I realize that is not an option that could fly).Hmm, before I could ever support that I would hope that more people would have a better understanding of the "current state", issues, candidates, platforms and agendas. These days the majority of people only have spun propaganda, empty promises, emotion and party loyalty to work with.
I could only imagine the shady tactics/marketing that would be employed to get the lazy and/or ignorant votes. it's bad enough now, forcing people to vote would make it worse.
If everyone was properly educated and engaged many more would choose to vote.
Layton offered to let the Govt amend their budget, and they said no. Flaherty said this isn't collective bargaining. So that is why the NDP supported the non-confidence motion.
I think, Al, you've been watching the 24 hour news channels a bit too late at night and your memory has mixed up the order of events.
actually, i remember a news clip of layton making that offer, however; it was before there was ever an actual budget on which to negotiate - only 'leaked' indications of what the budget would be, and that was when flaherty made the 'collective bargaining' comment - obviously pissing on ndp's labour supportI think maybe you have a comprehension problem. Let's outline:
Budget is presented to the house Tuesday March 22, 2011. Bloc, NDP and Liberals say "not good enough"
http://www.nupge.ca/content/4153/bu...uch-can-t-be-trusted-help-struggling-families
Liberals table non-confidence motion Wednesday March 23, 2011. Bloc, NDP and Liberals vote to schedule non-confidence motion before debate or vote on the budget. http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110323/budget-follow-election-110323/
Liberals, Bloc and NDP vote non-confidence in the government Friday March 25, 2011. http://www.vancouversun.com/news/El...ls+sending+Canadians+polls/4506044/story.html
I don't negotiate with people that tell me that they are set on a course of action. Once the NDP voted to schedule the non-confidence vote on Friday and most importantly, before any debate or vote on the budget - it became useless to negotiate with them. There was never a time between the budget being tabled and the non-confidence motion being tabled where negotiations could begin.
IF, the NDP had voted against scheduling the non-confidence vote before the budget vote - perhaps it would have been worth negotiating with them.
That is exactly what their counting on, voter apathy means a low turn out at the polls which benefits them. Blaming this election on the Lib, NDP, and BQ is also exactly what the Tories want. All sides are equally guilty and unfortunately we're stuck with all of them.Disagree completely. The Tories gloaded the opposition into an election by presenting a budget that pleases no one (except may be the NDP but Layton did not want to appear as weak). They think the timing is right to try and get a majority. What they didn't count on is the population's lack of appetitie for another election.
that's right - does anybody remember the Reform Party?all parties start out as minor parties. We have seen minor parties grow into major parties in this country.
Actually, what toppled the Govt was a non-confidence vote due to "contempt of parliament", not the budget.Disagree completely. The Tories gloaded the opposition into an election by presenting a budget that pleases no one (except may be the NDP but Layton did not want to appear as weak). They think the timing is right to try and get a majority. What they didn't count on is the population's lack of appetitie for another election.
Yes, but it was the budget that the Cons planned to goad them with; the opposition thought it would be more to their advantage to topple them with the contempt of parliament vote.Actually, what toppled the Govt was a non-confidence vote due to "contempt of parliament", not the budget.
Do some research. From what I have read in the news and a couple of blogs showed that the Finance Minister did solicit support with some policies to appeal to all the parties.Disagree completely. The Tories gloaded the opposition into an election by presenting a budget that pleases no one (except may be the NDP but Layton did not want to appear as weak). They think the timing is right to try and get a majority. What they didn't count on is the population's lack of appetitie for another election.
Do some REAL research.Do some research. From what I have read in the news and a couple of blogs showed that the Finance Minister did solicit support with some policies to appeal to all the parties.
What the NDP wanted was to make changes to things like seniors benefits etc which would have required consent of all the province and territories. It could not have been unilaterally implemented.
Still it doesn't matter one bit who you are and who you want to vote for in this discussion.
I am still pissed of at yet another several hundred million dollars of our money to be spent on an election which will probably be the same result as what we have now.
And the Liberal, NDP and the Separatists had no intentions of engineering their own agenda?Do some REAL research.
Harper met with Layton for about an hour. The whole thing was window-dressing.
Be pissed at the election if you want - but IT IS NOT being brought on solely by the opposition. Harper has been engineering this for two years.
I suppose you feel the multi-multi-millions spent on those oh-so-informative CAP commercials had no hidden agenda?
And pray tell what would that agenda be?And the Liberal, NDP and the Separatists had no intentions of engineering their own agenda?
PFFFt Please.





