Kimmy at Venus
- Thread starter trawler
- Start date
As a further side note, I have. After all, I founded the group.
So, should that Group Hug and Tug be added to the agenda at the next meet? And maybe we could discuss changing the name to HOMOE?
You're just jealous cuz you get to see only one gal, and she doesn't give you any rope to see other sps.
How lame is paying a gal 250 for a session where all you do is talk to her, both of you fully clothed, like you do?Markl said:
Better than asking Cherry/Shelby to marry you, and having her turn you down 350 times.Markl said:
Didn't think Cherry/Shelby allowed you to have any male friends, seeing as how you spend all your time taking kitkats and dilly bars to the SPs at the studios.Markl said:
uh oh... FFG founded MERL.
In that case, scratch my name off the list and please alert the FOUR founding fathers that ownership has changed hands... they might be interested in knowing that
In that case, scratch my name off the list and please alert the FOUR founding fathers that ownership has changed hands... they might be interested in knowing that
a secret handshake?
No we are passed that. We start with a manly hug followed by a quick squeeze of the left.... wait I can't tell you.
Looks like your going to have to come down and find out for yourself
No we are passed that. We start with a manly hug followed by a quick squeeze of the left.... wait I can't tell you.
Looks like your going to have to come down and find out for yourself
No secret handshake here. We just shake each other's cocks at the door. Plenty of hand sanitizers all around.a secret handshake?
No we are passed that. We start with a manly hug followed by a quick squeeze of the left.... wait I can't tell you.
Looks like your going to have to come down and find out for yourself
Aren't you guys following Fiddy's sermon on this important matter?Fiddy/Fiddy said:
No, I`m just following this thread, which was going along fine until the hijack happened on post #10. You should re-read the rules on posting ettiquete FFG, introducing a totally unrelated SP into a review is disrespectful to the lady being reviewed and disruptive for pooners, and you continue to derail the train with provocation and innuendo. Your ridiculous muderating isn`t bad enough, you can`t even follow the rules you pretend to know.
I am friends with a couple of brother pooners I met via the PERBanons that were held a few years ago, and we still meet for social occasions. Yeah we talk about pooning and SPs, but we also talk about other stuff. Sometimes an SP I've never met before may be invited along, and it's a better way of doing a meet & greet than the 5 seconds I get at an MP.
The ladies are invited too, but if they are not Paid Advertisers, they can`t make conversation with the pooners, and if unpaid advertisers, have to be fully covered and clothed. No nudity.
I beg to disagree. Hijack happened way before, from posts 4,5,7,8 and 9.
To which I reply, that jd says it better than I could:HB40 said:
jdtipper said:
Last edited:
I agree, however, from my point of view anyways, is the less $$ required = more probability of a regretful experience
