Hi Dogster
Thanks for the great review. It was to the point and contained all the pertinent info. that we use this board for.
Dogster`s review
Perbsters & Perbettes
Let me the first to say that mine are probably the worst around. I am making a resolution to myself to use Dogsters format and content.
I do like (no make that love) Hatrick`s posts and those by TJ in the Peg and a lot of other reviews which are longer and well written posts. They make for enjoyable reading. However they also tend to contain pertinent info such as what services one can expect from the SP concerned within YMMV limits.
Of late, I`ve seen some posts that pretty much tantamount to "I`ve seen x. I had an awesome time." While this is better than nothing, IMHO posting a some consistent pieces of information along the lines of Dogster would be helpful to all of us hobbyist.
Here`s a call to perb members to see if we could adopt the practice of posting a minimum set of information as part of any review, long or short. Any thoughts?
Damien
Thanks for the great review. It was to the point and contained all the pertinent info. that we use this board for.
Dogster`s review
Perbsters & Perbettes
Let me the first to say that mine are probably the worst around. I am making a resolution to myself to use Dogsters format and content.
I do like (no make that love) Hatrick`s posts and those by TJ in the Peg and a lot of other reviews which are longer and well written posts. They make for enjoyable reading. However they also tend to contain pertinent info such as what services one can expect from the SP concerned within YMMV limits.
Of late, I`ve seen some posts that pretty much tantamount to "I`ve seen x. I had an awesome time." While this is better than nothing, IMHO posting a some consistent pieces of information along the lines of Dogster would be helpful to all of us hobbyist.
Here`s a call to perb members to see if we could adopt the practice of posting a minimum set of information as part of any review, long or short. Any thoughts?
Damien
