Samantha GFE?
- Thread starter beans
- Start date
I hate saying something is or isn't available as I find sometimes I read that something is and don't get it and then something isn't (like on a website that says cbj only and I get bbbj) and I get it.beans said:
So, take this is a salt grain or three. I didn't attempt DATY but she didn't give the vibes she wanted that. I did get some LFK and some uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding.
Hope that helps.
Are we talking about the same Sam?....You must be something of a stud muffin....it sounds like you really don't have to pay for it....I'm just sick and tired of bullshit....I never recalled reading a review(and i've done an extensive search) on Sam offering lfk...and wtf is "some uncovered partial activity"...like really what is that??CalgaryPooner said:
I've always had the impression that Sam was heavy duty YMMV and now I know for sure....obviously it doesn't cause warm fuzzys when you finally realize you have dished $$$$ only to find out many others are getting better service.
And don't be given me shit for tellin the truth....many seem to be in denial about reality....i just think it's refreshing to tell the truth sometimes.
How the fuck did you draw your conclusions from what I posted.deslicher said:
Give you head a shake after you remove it from your anus. I simply said she was pretty decent with me but not a true GFE.
I prefaced my comments with "I hate saying something is or is not avaiable" just because I was sure someone like you would decide if you didn't get something, it was obviously a massive conspiracy and the poster was not "truthful".
EVERYONE gets a different experience. That is why I cannot undrerstand all these absolutes. Someone posts an experience or review and they are "wrong". How can that be? Someone uses certain terminology but are wrong. How can that be?
If you don't like what somone else gets or you get better, why doubt it? Oh, because you are the total authority on everyone else's experience?
NOTHING I post on this board is untrue. I will never divuldge my own personal identify or that, if I know it, of any girl I see and I won't go into gory details of a session in a review. I am sure I am similar to most of the posters in all those regards.
Get over yourself.
Calgary Pooner: me thinks thou doth protest too much 
I'm gonna go with deslicher on this one.....I sense BS in the first degree.
My experience with Sam (which goes all the way back to Marlborough) was that she was incredibly hot, and very friendly, but also safe all the way around, and while good, far from a GFE in any way, shape, or form.
In fact, there were even restrictions as to what positions she would allow (including a very standard one that she outright refused to do).
Also, she was very, very "professional" - read: detached. Not unfriendly or rude, just not GFE. So the thought of any LFK or uncovered activity, partial or not, was out of the question. I'd be extremely shocked if that had changed, in any way, by now.
I have not seen her since she left CY, but like I said, I sincerely doubt she has altered her safety standards.
Just the opinion of someone who used to be a regular.
I'm gonna go with deslicher on this one.....I sense BS in the first degree.
My experience with Sam (which goes all the way back to Marlborough) was that she was incredibly hot, and very friendly, but also safe all the way around, and while good, far from a GFE in any way, shape, or form.
In fact, there were even restrictions as to what positions she would allow (including a very standard one that she outright refused to do).
Also, she was very, very "professional" - read: detached. Not unfriendly or rude, just not GFE. So the thought of any LFK or uncovered activity, partial or not, was out of the question. I'd be extremely shocked if that had changed, in any way, by now.
I have not seen her since she left CY, but like I said, I sincerely doubt she has altered her safety standards.
Just the opinion of someone who used to be a regular.
Hey Calgary Pooner, I'm not saying your wrong or lying...I'm just enlightening people not to reward someone for giving a service that's not up to their standards...I would be a moron to see Sam now after what you wrote....considering from what you wrote she simply afforded you better service....I'm just out to save some people some money
And since you brought it up....and you mentioned that you sometimes get bbbj even though the provider doesn't offer it.......You may want to try getting over yourself as well. I realize there is often differing levels of service and i've had both...good and not so good and thats why i get tired of hearing sp's and clients talk about it as a service.....as if it's like all other services...Do you think i'm paying my accountant to give ymmv service?? If they do they're going to hear about it.... so if sp's are going to give inconsistent and widely divergent ymmv experiences...than we should know about.....call it the BBB of sp's.
And since you brought it up....and you mentioned that you sometimes get bbbj even though the provider doesn't offer it.......You may want to try getting over yourself as well. I realize there is often differing levels of service and i've had both...good and not so good and thats why i get tired of hearing sp's and clients talk about it as a service.....as if it's like all other services...Do you think i'm paying my accountant to give ymmv service?? If they do they're going to hear about it.... so if sp's are going to give inconsistent and widely divergent ymmv experiences...than we should know about.....call it the BBB of sp's.
Think as you wish. As I have stated in other threads, I will not divuldge certain things about sessions or anyone's identity but NOTHING I post will be untruthful. Nothing. Anonomity includes the freedome to be totally and completely honest.Bartdude said:Calgary Pooner: me thinks thou doth protest too much
I'm gonna go with deslicher on this one.....I sense BS in the first degree.
My experience with Sam (which goes all the way back to Marlborough) was that she was incredibly hot, and very friendly, but also safe all the way around, and while good, far from a GFE in any way, shape, or form.
In fact, there were even restrictions as to what positions she would allow (including a very standard one that she outright refused to do).
Also, she was very, very "professional" - read: detached. Not unfriendly or rude, just not GFE. So the thought of any LFK or uncovered activity, partial or not, was out of the question. I'd be extremely shocked if that had changed, in any way, by now.
I have not seen her since she left CY, but like I said, I sincerely doubt she has altered her safety standards.
Just the opinion of someone who used to be a regular.
Nothing in my session with Sam was "unsafe" and I certainly would not have said it was a gfe. It was also not a session with us both enclosed with saran wrap from head to toe.
ymmv doesn't apply to anyone but yourself I guess? Geeeeezzz.
Will do. You got me to rights. The THREE times I saw Sam, two prior and one post indie, we cuddled and read poetry. Oh, and we were covered with Saran Wrap the entire time.Bartdude said:
What you define as "unsafe" isn't the same as what I do. I have not told anyone on this board to do as you have asked me, though physically impossible task that it is, yet somehow I attack. Hmmmm.
Anyway, you got me. It was all cuddles and poetry. Oh, and I brought a gift each time too.
(anyone got a good link to someone shaking their head so hard it almost comes off?!)
I may be wrong but got impression from her if you hadn't seen her before she may not see you again. She hasn't said to me that she has stopped but it hasn't been recent that I have seen her or tried to call either.albroker said:
Put it this way, the contact information I have for her is either old or she doesn't want me posting it so perhaps Bartdude can get it for you. He is a very friendly sort. The type that makes us proud to be Calgarians!
For those interested, a peck can be LFK. If you want tongue, doubt she is for you. If you want cuddles and poetry, she rocks!
If you actually read the first post, then it should be clear. If you need me to draw you a picture, send me your crayons. Also, check Webster's for the term partial - how you equate that to some full on uncovered is beyond me. If you stopped worrying about using your new found words for feeling all grown up, you might actually READ what I said. For the last time, and r-e-a-l-l-y s-l-o-w-l-y as class seems to be going a bit fast for you, r-e-a-d t-h-e p-o-s-t. Your problem is you are equating some VERY limited hints as something more with full on uncovered action. I KNOW this girl pretty well. Seen her three times and we have playful encounters. They are NOT gfe and they do not include things like lengthy bbbj and certainly anything involving fluid potential is covered. With that said, and again s-l-o-w-l-y for you, although perhaps I am forgetting for you it may be different, fluids are not exchanged in the first five minutes of any encounter. Even then, what I was referring to was so limited in nature that I prefaced it c-a-f-e-f-u-l-l-y so that no one would misunderstand. Clearly, I was wrong in my pace for the class and guess will have to wait for some kids to catch up. We don't want you going a back a year again, do we?Bartdude said:Yep....more BS.
You claimed she performed some uncovered activity. I called BS. You have yet to address that, other than your stupid, lame, saran-wrap comment (WTF?)
Please enlighten us, and refute my claim, or kindly STFU
And, no, I choose not to STFU only as I don't hear anyone asking that has any grounds to do so.
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” + jealousy in the face of YMMV + rampant speculation = false accusation of BBBJ and\or BBFS
False accusation of BBBJ and\or BBFS = assumption of exchange of bodily fluids
False accusations + pooner bravado = repeated chest pounding including potty mouthed verbal diarrhea
Repeated chest pounding including potty mouthed verbal diarrhea = Drama
Unfortunately however
This post = me contributing to the drama (not for long I suspect)
Is it possible that
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” <> exchange of bodily fluids?
AND
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” = BLS that the reviewer wanted to hint at but not say so that every Tom, Dick and Dickless didn’t ask Sam for same?
OR
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” = hand job that reviewer didn’t want to acknowledge once the chest pounding ensued?
OR
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” = something that was fun and safe but is no longer on the menu?
Nice place you have here. I bet Sam’s awfully happy with the way this initially positive review is progressing. I also bet reviewer is delighted that he took the time to share his reaction to a positive pooning experience with us. I only wish I were one of Sam’s clients just so I could get her prolonged, outstanding, partially uncovered reaction to all this BS first hand.
False accusation of BBBJ and\or BBFS = assumption of exchange of bodily fluids
False accusations + pooner bravado = repeated chest pounding including potty mouthed verbal diarrhea
Repeated chest pounding including potty mouthed verbal diarrhea = Drama
Unfortunately however
This post = me contributing to the drama (not for long I suspect)
Is it possible that
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” <> exchange of bodily fluids?
AND
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” = BLS that the reviewer wanted to hint at but not say so that every Tom, Dick and Dickless didn’t ask Sam for same?
OR
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” = hand job that reviewer didn’t want to acknowledge once the chest pounding ensued?
OR
“uncovered partial activity that was prolonged and outstanding” = something that was fun and safe but is no longer on the menu?
Nice place you have here. I bet Sam’s awfully happy with the way this initially positive review is progressing. I also bet reviewer is delighted that he took the time to share his reaction to a positive pooning experience with us. I only wish I were one of Sam’s clients just so I could get her prolonged, outstanding, partially uncovered reaction to all this BS first hand.
