Is prostitution

wet_suit_one

Rule by Fear!
May 19, 2004
244
2
0
Sleazy?

At least, with the sp's most of us are familiar with?

Definition of sleazy:

1 a : lacking firmness of texture : flimsy b : carelessly made of inferior materials : shoddy
2 a : marked by low character or quality <sleazy tabloids> b : squalid, dilapidated <sleazy bars>


I would say not, based on the definition above from Merriam Webster's.

They generally do not lack for firmness, have wonderful textures, do not make for careless or inferior sexual experience (or female beauty). The exchange may be marked by low character (depends on the participants really, but it's quite an honest and upright exchange, my money for your body for our pleasure (at least it is hoped) or my pleasure (to which I'm perfectly entitled whether I stroke it, she strokes it (for pay or not)).

I suppose ladies who don't care of themselves may be "squalid" and "dilapidated" (so to speak), but generally, not the case (at least not the sps I pick).

Another definition is here:

1.
a. Shabby, dirty, and vulgar; tawdry: "sleazy storefronts with torn industrial carpeting and dirt on the walls" (Seattle Weekly).
b. Dishonest or corrupt; disreputable: Some sleazy characters hang around casinos.
2. Made of low-quality materials; cheap or shoddy.
3. Thin and loosely woven; flimsy: The coat has a sleazy lining.

Again, most of these don't apply, least of all "dishonest." Dating is dishonest, marriage can be (and often is) dishonest, politics is dishonest. $$40 for fs is totally honest.

Some people use language so poorly it hurts...

Sigh...
 
Vancouver Escorts