I am surprised at how many members are on Perb.... and how many of them.. some new ones and some old ones have 0 ....nada..... nothing...... Tipota...... not 1 single post or review..... and yet they have access at all the reviews..... :doh:
How many members actually post ....?
- Thread starter poonmiester
- Start date
Miss Tanya.... I agree with the fact that.... handlers.... some SP. ... and AMP.... operators have handles..... some do post and others don't. .... and for those that do post ....easy to figure it out.... where it's from.....
Heard about the more private section ..... but to me it's still.seems to be same as Area 51......
At least a couple of boards have been set up with "Men's Only" and "Ladies Only" sections. One board had a 5 review entry requirement in order to enter the Men's Only area. Guess What. The board couldn't financially support itself. Most people couldn't see the reviews and nobody was interested in checking to see if nothing had been posted in the public area again today. The ladies that paid for the board with their advertising were getting no calls. So, then the board started selling memberships. The board still couldn't financially support itself because it turned out that there were less than 5 people that were willing to pay a membership fee.
This board supports itself because the ladies that advertise here actually get customers that saw their ad on this board.
I can understand that not being the best solution.... but the fact remains that there are way too many members just taking and taking and not putting any back in.....
If this board was structured with takers only. ... there would be nothing to take.... and those that do share.....once it's done many times can't even get a booking again.... or the price has gone up because the girl is so popular....but at the same time there will on be 4 or 5 post for this girl.... mmmmm shitty if you ask me....
So basically it's a business site for providers to advertise .... and posters to spend their own money to TOFT.....and post review so that leeches can benefit without any further contribution....awsome concept..... maybe we should also start paying to be able to post reviews.... so no reviews.... no advertising ....
My concept.... if you can't post.... then pay a membership fee... you get a this info... and don't give squat....
My concept.... if you can't post.... then pay a membership fee... you get a this info... and don't give squat....
Perfectly put! :clap2:
OTOH, certain SPs simply don't need any more reviews. They are already impossible to book (or worse, cancel your appointment whenever they please.)
It's not the reviews that bring people here. Take a look at the stats on who is looking at the site at any given moment. There are always more non-members than there are members. Non-members can't see the reviews, that's not why they come here.
The site
There are currently 956 users online. 391 members and 565 guests
The Lounge
Users Browsing this Forum
There are currently 102 users browsing this forum. (28 members & 74 guests)
Vancouver Escort Ads
Users Browsing this Forum
There are currently 54 users browsing this forum. (24 members & 30 guests)
Vancouver Massage Ads
Users Browsing this Forum
There are currently 7 users browsing this forum. (2 members & 5 guests)
The Vancouver Review section is full of members reviewing AMPs and Asian Micros. The reviews are mostly checklist and the most important item is usually BBBJ. Reviews of SPs that charge more than $200 are just about always jumped on with cries of "Shill" and discussions of how anything over $150 is a rip-off.
Dickson's review of Catherine James was jumped on immediately and I'm betting that she would rather avoided the 20 pages of discussion that did her business absolutely no good at all. That's why many advertisers don't want to be reviewed. It's not the review itself, it's the discussion that's posted if she's not providing BBFS for 20 dollars.
Are you insisting you have a better business model yet evidence doesn't support a pay to post solution. Why are the leeches giving you such grief?
but it's the same in life, poonmeister
ask any executive member of a public service organization such as the Lions Club, or a Rod and Gun club, or the coach of a kids soccer team - it's the old 80/20 rule... 20% of the group are doing 80% (or more) of the work. the rest are there to be able to say they are members and get as much free grog/lunches/dinners/glory as they can
it even works that way in volunteer community utility groups. ask anybody in the executive of a community water board how many members of the community actually contribute any work. there it becomes more like the 98/2 rule
just sayin'...
ask any executive member of a public service organization such as the Lions Club, or a Rod and Gun club, or the coach of a kids soccer team - it's the old 80/20 rule... 20% of the group are doing 80% (or more) of the work. the rest are there to be able to say they are members and get as much free grog/lunches/dinners/glory as they can
it even works that way in volunteer community utility groups. ask anybody in the executive of a community water board how many members of the community actually contribute any work. there it becomes more like the 98/2 rule
just sayin'...
You are right VC.... I guess it's not just this board ..... it's all around us.... day to day..... from the time we get up in the morning to the time we go to bed.... people using and taking advantage of those that have and will always contribute to society....but it's the same in life, poonmeister
ask any executive member of a public service organization such as the Lions Club, or a Rod and Gun club, or the coach of a kids soccer team - it's the old 80/20 rule... 20% of the group are doing 80% (or more) of the work. the rest are there to be able to say they are members and get as much free grog/lunches/dinners/glory as they can
it even works that way in volunteer community utility groups. ask anybody in the executive of a community water board how many members of the community actually contribute any work. there it becomes more like the 98/2 rule
just sayin'...
And have to put up with the defenders of takers.....
Anyway..... finished my rant .... I can see myself going on about so many other subject.... transit...cyclists. ...ICBC.... left lane huggers... and so on.... might as well stop...... he he he...
I quite enjoyed reading Dickson's exploits with the delectable Ms James, and I think there were a few others who did as well. And I'm not sure that it negatively impacted her business at all. There are different market segments on this board and one of those segments enjoys a more literary approach to the narrative. Maybe there should be another section on the board for the longer, narrative type reviews, so those who don't want to see them can avoid them easier.
I do post when I have someone to review but in a bit of a slump at the moment as I can't seem to get into it. It could be just a part of getting older. I do appreciate when people review here.
The review was great, I'm talking about the comments to the review. I've never worried about how long a post is, if I'm bored after the first paragraph, I don't read the rest.
Perhaps it helps to view the non posters in the same way as hockey fans...
given all the ads surrounding the venue, would those not partaking/buying each and every advertisers product be considered a leech? Rather, their particpation is passive. Most -perhaps merely some-of them may be consumers yet they prefer to do so discreetly. Fans help drive the business machine, providing a platform for the advertisers for the potential for business increase. Not every fan who buys the product does so with the same fervor. The fellow with the horn, painted face and jersey may not be the "season ticket go to every home game," fan whom is actually adding more revenue to the team and advertisers bottom line.
I prefer to believe all participants can play a role. It's up to the individual as to whether passive or active.
given all the ads surrounding the venue, would those not partaking/buying each and every advertisers product be considered a leech? Rather, their particpation is passive. Most -perhaps merely some-of them may be consumers yet they prefer to do so discreetly. Fans help drive the business machine, providing a platform for the advertisers for the potential for business increase. Not every fan who buys the product does so with the same fervor. The fellow with the horn, painted face and jersey may not be the "season ticket go to every home game," fan whom is actually adding more revenue to the team and advertisers bottom line.
I prefer to believe all participants can play a role. It's up to the individual as to whether passive or active.
Just tried to quote the comment that I was bothered by, It seems that with the banning of Dickson or with the banning of the person that made the comment, that whole thread is gone.
I enjoy reading Ms James and Dickson's reviews as well. Right up until he would talk about his giant shlong, how long it took him to cum and how she was one of the only ones who could handle his size and extended poundings. I guess a large vagina is a turn on to him but not to everyone.
Dickson was banned? That's why i haven't heard him around.
It says "banned" under his name on the posts that are left - however - he may have asked the mods to remove him, because one post asks how to remove himself from Perb. The other person is one of the multi handles that the mods keep playing wack a mole with.
ps, it's not possible for any man to be "too big", babies come out of the same passage.
