A little poll to gauge your opinions on this subject. How do you feel about agency owners sleeping with their SPs or promoting their VIPs because they're dating them?
Does it bother you if an agency owner sleeps with his SPs?
- Thread starter xUxJr311fr3P
- Start date
Would you eat at a restaurant if the chef didn't eat there?General Gonad said:
Pretty much any business owner is going to be biased in favor of themselves, keep that in mind when you look at any agency's webpage. That's why we have this site to provide a reality check to what might be hoplessly optimistic assertions on agency websites.
So really, I don't care who's sleeping with whom, just so long as it doesn't conflict with my appointment and no one gets ripped off.
old spooner,old pooner said:
Coercion, whether blatant or subtle, is rampant among male agency owners. This is why I prefer independent ladies who do not need to put up with this abuse. I will also consider an agency run by a woman.
GG
So if you were to run an agency, you would tell your SPs that you need to "try them out". Nothing personal, only business.LonelyGhost said:
Moreover, you would pump your favorite to clients and call her a VIP. No conflicts of interest there?
I beg to differ...in Montreal it is the norm rather than the exception. Is it different in Vancouver? I doubt it.Maury Beniowski said:
GG
OK then GG, try this on for size...
A very high proportion of owners (60%+) in this business are women.
A very high proportion of the balance are long-term couples.
Couples don't last too long when the hanky panky starts...
Where do you get your numbers? I get mine from City Hall...
A very high proportion of owners (60%+) in this business are women.
A very high proportion of the balance are long-term couples.
Couples don't last too long when the hanky panky starts...
Where do you get your numbers? I get mine from City Hall...
As long as they shower before showing up at my door or me at theirs I couldn't give a flying fuck who they fuck
It wouldn't bother me as long as SPs aren't being forced to bang a male owner as a condition of their employment.
Most of the MPs in Edmonton are run by women. The very small number of male-run MPs here often recruit young, raw and untested talent, so I wouldn't put it past these owners to break 'em in.
Most of the MPs in Edmonton are run by women. The very small number of male-run MPs here often recruit young, raw and untested talent, so I wouldn't put it past these owners to break 'em in.
You know most guys feel the same way you do.HeMadeMeDoIt said:As long as they shower before showing up at my door or me at theirs I couldn't give a flying fuck who they fuck
The ones who feel different usually like to be the first in the morning - the romantic types.
And, what kind of an illusion does that make?
General Gonad said:
What if a woman owner of an agency was sleeping with her girls?
You are trying to taint our views of the male owner however I am sure that many girls actively try to sleep with the boss (for more money, preferential treatment)... goes on in every business.
If these statements apply to Vancouver, then it is definetely different from Montreal. None of these apply here.Maury Beniowski said:
I agree, as long as the girl isn't being coerced into it, I don't really care. I'm probably more jealous, actually.wolverine said:
This is the formula as it pertains to revenue in a massage place. Generally speaking, the owner keeps what is collected outside the room, the lady what is collected inside. Ladies that are confronted with paying fees from their earnings, other than advertising sharing, walk out...real fast.Papi Chulo said:
Anything different has to do with debts by the lady to the owners, such as what they agreed to pay for being smuggled into Canada.
But that's another story...
