Death of Free Internet is Imminent: Canada Will Be Test Case

SilkyJohnson

Banned
Jan 16, 2007
535
0
0
heres something to watch for.

In the upcoming weeks watch for a report in Time Magazine that will attempt to smooth over the rough edges of a diabolical plot by Bell Canada and Telus, to begin charging per site fees on most Internet sites. The plan is to convert the Internet into a cable-like system, where customers sign up for specific web sites, and then pay to visit sites beyond a cutoff point.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3502

welcome to internet 2.

like that article i posted a few weeks back with the french chick with huge boobs.
 

john-john

Banned
Nov 7, 2006
150
0
0
No 2 companies can control the internet. By 2010 this guy will have made up some other conspiracy theory hoo-ha and it will start all over again.

But I guess if it's on the net, it must be true!!!
 

DQ Guy

Ice cream man
May 2, 2008
1,437
10
0
The monster under your bed
Yep must be true.. And now its on Perb.. Double true:D
 

tedsweettangv

Active member
May 5, 2006
732
79
28
Vancouver
I wouldn't put it past Telus though. I think Telus's goal is to have everybody in Canada on Shaw Cable for phone and internet by 2012.

Telus - We're not happy until you're not happy.
 

smackyo

pimp supreme
May 18, 2005
1,636
4
0
your mom says hi.
while i don't believe everything from that site, this idea of the big internet provider companies has been reported on by a lot of mainstream news outlets. this does have the potential to be a very serious problem.
 

JustCallMeR

New member
Oct 5, 2006
148
0
0
As has been repeatedly pointed out, the companies MUST get approval from both the FTC (in the U.S.) and the CRTC (in Canada).

BOTH have repeatedly said that it's not going to happen.
 

JustCallMeR

New member
Oct 5, 2006
148
0
0
And the FTC heavily fined AT&T for "throttling". Plus the CRTC is investigating Bell on the same issue. Bell claims that they were only doing it to fight "Internet congestion" and that they were not trying to commercially control things.

So the CRTC has now ordered Bell to publicly prove "Internet congestion".

This link will give you the details (this link is not to one of the conspiracy sites, but to the CBC's coverage of the CRTC order):

http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2008/06/19/tech-bell.html
 
Last edited:

Feenix

New member
Dec 11, 2006
912
0
0
I am here.
I am not sure how seriously to take this possibility. The market place will rule.

If Telus and Bell begin to implement restrictions such as those mentioned, you will see more small ISPs reenter the marker, as dissatisfied customers leave the big guys in droves.

We have become too used to unrestricted access to the web. You think you heard an uproar over charging for incoming text messages. Just wait until those restrictions come into play.

IMHO, it won't happen.
 

HeMadeMeDoIt

New member
Feb 12, 2004
2,029
2
0
heres something to watch for.

In the upcoming weeks watch for a report in Time Magazine that will attempt to smooth over the rough edges of a diabolical plot by Bell Canada and Telus, to begin charging per site fees on most Internet sites. The plan is to convert the Internet into a cable-like system, where customers sign up for specific web sites, and then pay to visit sites beyond a cutoff point.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3502

welcome to internet 2.

like that article i posted a few weeks back with the french chick with huge boobs.

Silky time to double dose on the paranoia meds.
 

deberry

New member
Jul 15, 2007
181
0
0
infowars.com is about the only place to get the actual real news. Mainstream media is so corrupt its incredible. And yes Canada will be the test case. This is true.
 

SilkyJohnson

Banned
Jan 16, 2007
535
0
0
y dont u wake up and smell reality? i bet u never even read past the first sentence. let alone search the net for anything else on this topic. maybe u did and found lots of stuff to back up this claim. and since u can't deal with reality u just ignore it. like those ppl that always tell me i'm to negative. no i'm just being real.

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=ray+mcgovern&hl=en&sitesearch=#q=nwo quotes&hl=en

i know you'll just ignore this too.
 

HeMadeMeDoIt

New member
Feb 12, 2004
2,029
2
0
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25862033/

MSNBC.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FCC may punish Comcast over Web blocking
The action is the first test of the agency's network neutrality principles
By John Dunbar
The Associated Press
updated 7:17 a.m. PT, Sat., July. 26, 2008
WASHINGTON - A majority of members of the Federal Communications Commission have cast votes in favor of punishing Comcast Corp. for blocking subscribers' Internet traffic, an agency official said Friday.

Comcast, the nation's largest cable company, was accused of violating agency principles that guarantee customers open access to the Internet.

Three commissioners have voted in favor of an order reaching agreement with the finding, enough for a majority on the five-member commission. But the decision will not be final until all five members have cast their votes. The commission is scheduled to take up the issue at its Aug. 1 meeting.

The three votes in favor were Democrats Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein and Republican chairman Kevin Martin, who recommended the company be found in violation, according to the official, who asked not to be named because the vote was not yet final.

The potentially precedent-setting move stems from a complaint against Comcast that the company had blocked Internet traffic among users of a certain type of "file sharing" software that allows them to exchange large amounts of data.

The text of the order is not public. But Martin has said it will not include a fine. He also said it will require Comcast to stop its practice of blocking; provide details to the commission on the extent and manner in which the practice has been used; and to disclose to consumers details on future plans for managing its network going forward.

"I continue to believe that is imperative that all consumers have unfettered access to the Internet," Martin said in a statement released early Saturday morning. "I am pleased that a majority has agreed that the Commission both has the authority to and in fact will stop broadband service providers when they block or interfere with subscribers' access."

The FCC approved a policy statement in September 2005 that outlined a set of principles meant to ensure that broadband networks are "widely deployed, open, affordable and accessible to all consumers."

The principles, however, are "subject to reasonable network management."

Comcast spokeswoman Sena Fitzmaurice in a statement released Friday night said the company's network management practices are "reasonable, wholly consistent with industry practices and that we did not block access to Web sites or online applications, including peer-to-peer services."


The action is the first test of the agency's network neutrality principles. Members of both the House and Senate have sponsored network neutrality bills, but they have never come close to becoming law.

Large Internet service providers have fought against such regulation, arguing that it is a solution in search of a problem and that companies that spend billions on their networks must be free to manage traffic.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25862033/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MSN Privacy . Legal
© 2008 MSNBC.com
 
Vancouver Escorts