Bbbj
- Thread starter goodman
- Start date
Uhhh.
Only a couple and only if you've seen them 6-7 times.
Pretty much have to wait for girls visiting from out-of-town.
That's funny actually... a guy from out-of-town getting good service in Calgary only from girls from out-of-town.
Calgary rocks.
Only a couple and only if you've seen them 6-7 times.
Pretty much have to wait for girls visiting from out-of-town.
That's funny actually... a guy from out-of-town getting good service in Calgary only from girls from out-of-town.
Calgary rocks.
It is rather weird than funny. In other major cities in North America such as LA, NYC, TO, Chicago, Texas, etc, etc, "a guy from out-of-town getting good service in Calgary only from girls from out-of-town" would never happen. I understand you need to build up trust to get more intimate services but this is something I have never seen before.Captain Canuck said:
flying to Bangkok next month where only out-of-town guys get good serviceps I was in Toronto on business a couple of weeks ago. If you have a chance to visit TO and and look for ubinhibited fun, check out www.destiny-girls.com
I saw both of them, Jasmine and Maxima. Both provide bbbj, daty, russian, msog, pse, pretty much everything is on the menu. Greek is also possible but I did not go that far.
Last edited:
check this out
There are quite a number of other sources and studies that medically prove that there is almost zero risk of HIV transmission through unprotected oral sex unless there are open cuts or sores either in a mouth or female or male genitals. I just picked a couple of articles shown below that corroborate this. Read carefully.
p.s. Everyting in our lives carries risk. You have chosen to hobby, so there is a risk. Accept it, or you can't hobby at all. If you are a CSI investigator or an OCD patient, you will end up getting more stress from hobbying. There is a risk just lying down on the massage table or touch the doorknob of the massage room or there are actually higher risks of touching the doorknobs of public bathrooms. There is risk driving home everynight after work.
There is no such thing as 100% absolute safe sex, just safer sex.
http://ari.ucsf.edu/pdf/PressReleases/PR_11_21_02.pdf
The State of Oral Sex
A New Debate Over Safety in Sucking
by Duncan Osborne
February 19 - 25, 2003
How safe is oral sex? That question has been on the tip of many tongues ever since AIDS raised its deadly head. Now one expert says that fellatio may not be risky at all, at least when it comes to spreading HIV.
Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, who heads the sexually transmitted disease prevention effort at the San Francisco Department of Public Health, bases his conclusion on a new study of 239 gay or bisexual men who reported no anal or vaginal sex and no injection-drug use in the prior six months. Ninety-eight percent said they had given head without condoms. Twenty-eight percent said they knew their partner was HIV-positive, and of those, 39 percent said they had swallowed semen. None of the men became infected.
The risk of HIV transmission via oral sex, Klausner maintains, "is very, very, very, very, very low and may be zero."
A 2002 Spanish study supports Klausner's view. Researchers there followed 110 women and 25 men, all HIV-negative, for 10 years. Each participant had an HIV-positive partner. The investigators estimated that over the course of the study, the couples engaged in 19,000 acts of unprotected fellatio or cunnilingus. None of the negative partners converted.
A 1998 Emory University study analyzed 24 epidemiological investigations of HIV transmission via oral sex among heterosexuals or gay men. Generally, oral sex was not found to be a risk factor, though five of those studies concluded that among some gay men and crack users, sucking did transmit HIV.
"Yes, it does occur," says Richard Rothenberg, a professor at Emory University's School of Medicine. "It's probably a relatively small contribution to the epidemiology of HIV transmission."
Still, no piece of good news goes undebated.
Klausner's comments set off Rex Wockner, a journalist whose syndicated news stories and commentaries have appeared in the gay press for 18 years. "I know four people who I believe when they tell me that they seroconverted from sucking," Wockner told the Voice. Of those four friends, Wockner notes, one is now dead.
__________________
There are quite a number of other sources and studies that medically prove that there is almost zero risk of HIV transmission through unprotected oral sex unless there are open cuts or sores either in a mouth or female or male genitals. I just picked a couple of articles shown below that corroborate this. Read carefully.
p.s. Everyting in our lives carries risk. You have chosen to hobby, so there is a risk. Accept it, or you can't hobby at all. If you are a CSI investigator or an OCD patient, you will end up getting more stress from hobbying. There is a risk just lying down on the massage table or touch the doorknob of the massage room or there are actually higher risks of touching the doorknobs of public bathrooms. There is risk driving home everynight after work.
There is no such thing as 100% absolute safe sex, just safer sex.
http://ari.ucsf.edu/pdf/PressReleases/PR_11_21_02.pdf
The State of Oral Sex
A New Debate Over Safety in Sucking
by Duncan Osborne
February 19 - 25, 2003
How safe is oral sex? That question has been on the tip of many tongues ever since AIDS raised its deadly head. Now one expert says that fellatio may not be risky at all, at least when it comes to spreading HIV.
Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, who heads the sexually transmitted disease prevention effort at the San Francisco Department of Public Health, bases his conclusion on a new study of 239 gay or bisexual men who reported no anal or vaginal sex and no injection-drug use in the prior six months. Ninety-eight percent said they had given head without condoms. Twenty-eight percent said they knew their partner was HIV-positive, and of those, 39 percent said they had swallowed semen. None of the men became infected.
The risk of HIV transmission via oral sex, Klausner maintains, "is very, very, very, very, very low and may be zero."
A 2002 Spanish study supports Klausner's view. Researchers there followed 110 women and 25 men, all HIV-negative, for 10 years. Each participant had an HIV-positive partner. The investigators estimated that over the course of the study, the couples engaged in 19,000 acts of unprotected fellatio or cunnilingus. None of the negative partners converted.
A 1998 Emory University study analyzed 24 epidemiological investigations of HIV transmission via oral sex among heterosexuals or gay men. Generally, oral sex was not found to be a risk factor, though five of those studies concluded that among some gay men and crack users, sucking did transmit HIV.
"Yes, it does occur," says Richard Rothenberg, a professor at Emory University's School of Medicine. "It's probably a relatively small contribution to the epidemiology of HIV transmission."
Still, no piece of good news goes undebated.
Klausner's comments set off Rex Wockner, a journalist whose syndicated news stories and commentaries have appeared in the gay press for 18 years. "I know four people who I believe when they tell me that they seroconverted from sucking," Wockner told the Voice. Of those four friends, Wockner notes, one is now dead.
__________________
Last edited:
