anyone tried nana
- Thread starter scorpete
- Start date
Reminder that women are not something you try, but rather someone you meet.
Semantics my dear.
Not trying to rub ya the wrong way or anything but I think you may be idealizing the role of the women in these transactions.
We meet women in public and at work etc but, when we're literally paying a provider we've never been with before for a service, defining it as trying is about as accurate as you can get.
It may be comforting to call it by different names but, at the end of the day, when money is changing hands, it's all business
And all of that is completely ignoring the other implications of using the word 'try' in this context. For ages, sexually available women have been likened to cars or bikes in that men will use terms like, take her for a spin or go for a ride and many other colourful descriptors to describe having a go with them. The intent is not to be disrespectful although I can easily see how it might be received that way. That said, the truth is, no matter how much PC, self and other awareness we wanna throw at things, some things will never change.
Would you be offended if a guy you were hot for invited you to give him a try? I think it's largely meant in sexy playful fun but if someone tells us not to speak a certain way or refer to them with a certain term, we should always do our best to respect that.
Everything in balance aye?
There's a lot of policing around here, and I find it odd. I feel like an alien observing the goings on of the people on this thread, and I'm going, why the need for judgement? Lurkerbelow is stating the obvious, that you try a new experience with a person. Why attribute more to that than was ever there in the first place? Why the need to insinuate that he's done a misdeed? Yes those people exists, but even for the trolls, you gotta point out any bad behaviour as respectfully as possible, or it's going to turn into an argument.
Feels like some people are on the hunt for reasons to judge others, and honestly it's getting old. The fact that the main message that the mods of this board have to its members is six back to back thou shalt nots, that's no way to set a positive tone. Everything starts from there, so instead of scolding us pre-emptively, tell us things we should be doing, like be courteous, respect each other, remember that people are here to help one another out and have each other's back, and if that's not you, then maybe this isn't the place for you.
Because the way it's currently set up, it's not the place for me, or I think for anyone who values being a part of a healthy community of people.
Feels like some people are on the hunt for reasons to judge others, and honestly it's getting old. The fact that the main message that the mods of this board have to its members is six back to back thou shalt nots, that's no way to set a positive tone. Everything starts from there, so instead of scolding us pre-emptively, tell us things we should be doing, like be courteous, respect each other, remember that people are here to help one another out and have each other's back, and if that's not you, then maybe this isn't the place for you.
Because the way it's currently set up, it's not the place for me, or I think for anyone who values being a part of a healthy community of people.
Last edited:
Miles Law (1943):
"where you stand depends on where you sit."
Rufus E. Miles, Jr.
Not surprising that customers, and which ever term you think most appropriate for ladies who work in the industry may differ in perspective .
"where you stand depends on where you sit."
Rufus E. Miles, Jr.
Not surprising that customers, and which ever term you think most appropriate for ladies who work in the industry may differ in perspective .
Last edited:
