Search results

Works fine for me:

The phone number isn't 0942 anymore. There are 2 numbers, ending in 5556 and 5582. That's not generally a good sign.

Taller than average, but beyond that I wouldn't know, I'm not good at those kinds of details. Here is what some reviewers have said about her body: Excellent long detailed review: Another positive review for Michelle at Sole excerpt:

Michelle at Sole Spa LL 1702 is in that territory. Lovely large breasts, excellent GFE including lots of DFK, good English, not young, but not an auntie either - more of a MILF. Well reviewed. Currently on vacation, should be back third week of September.

I agree. I worded things poorly. What I should have said was that I recommend avoiding those places. I've edited my post to reflect that.

@ashley maybe

I don't know of any MPs in the immediate area but there are a few that may be worthwhile within a few kilometers. Specifically Sole Spa and Broadway Spa. Nobility, Amy in particular, is also well reviewed, Nobility is massage and handjob only Sole Spa LL ad...

Angel Lae LL 1578 seems to be well reviewed: Her LL ad title mentions Olympic Village: https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/metro-vancouver/vancouver_well_reviewed_real_pics_69_goddes_olympic_village-9355885

I don't think reviews get deleted a lot and hopefully that's true. If it's not rare, then maybe that should be a topic for discussion or at least explanation. I'll make an analogy. The parents of a child are going to the supermarket in the same car. There could be a terrible accident that kills...

I don't agree about the echo chamber and curated comments. Once someone posts a review, the only ones who can manage the content are the mods and that's not a thing from what I've seen. I posted a review of Annie about 9 months ago and there were 4 or 5 people who posted reviews of their own in...

Ditto. Though I can see quite clearly now how some details should be less detailed - such as long and deep digits for example. Beyond that, I don't see myself doing reviews that aren't play by play style. It's much easier for me to describe the session that way. Being concise, picking what to...

I'm trying to understand this. A lot of the posts after this seem to think you are saying this isn't allowed anymore. Whereas, I am thinking this was meant literally - If you add a full review to an existing review then the second review would be lost if the review thread gets deleted. So a...

F212 Steam on Davie has glory holes and Tuesdays is All Genders Welcome so you could potentially set something up with your favorite SP. I'm pretty sure some of the PERB ladies would be into it. Steamworks Baths on Pender is a classier operation but the all gender events are less regular. I...

One of the lines in the template is: The Forum Rules say: Leolist links seem to be fine. I have no idea if links to Tryst profiles are allowed. Presumably, SP, MP, and Agency websites that are not advertisers are not allowed

I had a duo with Riza and Miss Hunter (under a different name which I don't recall - started with a T maybe) about a decade ago. "Miss Hunter" was amazing, really good kisser if I recall correctly. Riza was meh. It was less a duo and more being in bed with 2 SPs. Not interactive at all.

Does this apply to 411 posts and if so how? I assume a direct answer to a question without extra detail is okay. Case in point:

LL views is an odd criteria on which to base a "hidden gem" appraisal. Party Friendly in her ad is a much better criteria to judge on - red flag.

As a rule, 411 posts ask a question. Is there a question here?

A brief shouldn't be misleading. From the article: