On "Looks are subjective" and reviews in general
Everyone has different tastes, but there are certain faces and bodies that are more generally desirable. Otherwise kpop groups wouldn't have a designated visual; Angelina Jolie, Megan Fox, Margot Robbie, Scarlett Johansson etc. wouldn't be seen as sex symbols. Are there some people who don't find them hot? Of course! But overall youthfulness and signs of fertility are universally attractive, as is good skin condition. Maybe 1 to 5 out of a randomly sampled group of 100 prefer sandpaper skin whales, but that's not the majority.
Reviews don't help when all it can comment on about the looks are "I found her cute" or that "I liked her smile". From experience some people are just way off with their assessment. Unfortunately it's really difficult to gauge what is objectively attractive vs. subjective. I'd like to see more comments such as "I found so and so pretty and cute, but perhaps that's more of a niche preference". Even better if similarities to some celebrity is stated, and more objective judgments such as "she was quite tall" or "her skin was quite white" or "she had a lot of plastic surgery done".
What I'm saying is, try to add more qualitative judgments in a review while addressing your own biases. If we can rate restaurants then we can rate girls.
-
10
Your messages have been positively reacted to 25 times.
-
5
30 messages posted. You must like it here!
-
2
Somebody out there reacted positively to one of your messages. Keep posting like that for more!
-
1
Post a message somewhere on the site to receive this.