W
westcoast555
Oh.. I know what I'm talking about all right.
The fact is... your whole premise is silly. It's impossible to pull of a stunt like that without anybody knowing and it makes no sense to anybody with half a brain. It's needlessly complicated and impossible to cover up... except to guys like you who are smart enough to figure it out right?
And if somebody questions your implausible conclusions you resort to ad hominem statements. Have you ever heard of 'Occam's Razor?'. Probably not. You need some exposure to critical thinking.. instead of starting with a conclusion and grasping at facts to try and bolster your case.
Ask yourself this one... Why would they go to all the trouble? A simple truck bomb would have sufficed to blame on terrorists.
Furthermore.. what about the subway attacks in London? Were they faked by the British Government? And what's the Beijing hotel got to do with anything?
You simply don't understand the difference between conjecture and evidence.
Thermite.. C4... where's the proof? So firefighters heard explosions? So what? Lots of things will explode in a place that's being consumed by thousands of gallons of jet fuel. Boilers, pipes, water tanks etc.LOL fist of all it was THERMITE not C4 so you have no idea what we are even talking about. The fire fighters heard many explosions. I posted video above with audi clips, firemens radios etc. But since your a sheep and you cant face the tough reality, you pick what you WANT to hear.
Why didnt the Beijing hotel collapse. simple qustion since you know so damn much.
The fact is... your whole premise is silly. It's impossible to pull of a stunt like that without anybody knowing and it makes no sense to anybody with half a brain. It's needlessly complicated and impossible to cover up... except to guys like you who are smart enough to figure it out right?
And if somebody questions your implausible conclusions you resort to ad hominem statements. Have you ever heard of 'Occam's Razor?'. Probably not. You need some exposure to critical thinking.. instead of starting with a conclusion and grasping at facts to try and bolster your case.
Ask yourself this one... Why would they go to all the trouble? A simple truck bomb would have sufficed to blame on terrorists.
Furthermore.. what about the subway attacks in London? Were they faked by the British Government? And what's the Beijing hotel got to do with anything?
You simply don't understand the difference between conjecture and evidence.





