If an Election Was Held Today

If an election was held today, who would you vote for?

  • Trudeau

    Votes: 19 25.0%
  • Scheer

    Votes: 35 46.1%
  • Singh

    Votes: 6 7.9%
  • May

    Votes: 6 7.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 10 13.2%

  • Total voters
    76
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,543
7
0
Calgary
The Green Party does not appear to be doing very well in this poll. Many people do not realize that the Greens are no longer a one issue party, but have a very comprehensive, and fairly pragmatic, election platform.
Many people realize the Greens and to a bigger extent the NDP are total nutjobs.Try reading the NDP LEAP manifesto(only Communists have a Manifesto) and if they got Governance Canada would be on a collision course for destination FUCKED.

SR
 

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,253
1,192
113
Victoria
FEW: let me define that better....

When a gov has a majority (of the 338 seats); the gov is run by the privy counsel/cabinet which are some 36 members of the majority party...

As seen by the SNC Lavlin scandal, only 1 person dictates to the cabinet.... the prime minister (after all he is the one that assigns the MPs to an ministry position)


Now these FEW people run the country through the majority in parliament...

Those FEW are susceptible to party politics and bribes and other such shit from Lobbyists (companies and people with money). Murphy's Law states "he with the most gold makes the rules".... These Lobbyist tell/get/bribe to get their own rules into law to benefit them.....

The joeblow Cdn voter could not affect the outcome of the SNC Lavlin scandal, they can only vote in the next election...

But overall the FEW comment was a generalization of the political make up of Canada. The Canadian voter can only vote once every 5 years (at election time for federal elections).... Sounds like a democracy to me.... but really everything is left up to the lobbyists and the cabinet ministers... everyone else (majority MPs) falls into line; including the voters who can do nothing. They (voters) can't even recall their MP.
 

604jbear

Active member
Mar 11, 2017
276
118
43
If I could vote in Canada, I would definitely vote for Justin. It’s no contests, he is the most qualified of them all just take a look at the Canadian economy. He supports feminist and LGBTQ rights, he is aware of the environmental disaster that is threatening the planet and is doing what is necessary to save the planet, he is also going to ban guns in Canada to keep people safe.

This so called ethics violation is nothing more than his political enemies trying to de-throne him. He was trying to save peoples jobs by doing a plea bargaining deal. I don't know how often plea bargains are done in Canada but in the US it done frequently to save court costs and come up with reasonable outcomes for all involved. He is one of the most ethical leaders in the world. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Russians had something to do with pushing this witch hunt.

California Joe
Social Justice Warrior
I think had he come clean from the very beginning it would likely have been a non-issue. The problem is he kept denying it in the beginning, and only when it became clear evidence showed otherwise, then he started to spin it as in the interest of saving jobs.
 

Hugh Jass

Banned
May 11, 2015
306
1
16
I'm actually very surprised by the results of the poll. The Liberals are the best chance at getting prostitution decriminalized and legalized for both parties. A Conservative government would not do anything favourable for prostitution. In fact, it was the Conservatives under Harper that gave us the current laws around prostitution.
There are a few other issues to consider of a bit more importance.
 

overdone

Banned
Apr 26, 2007
1,828
442
83
I'm actually very surprised by the results of the poll. The Liberals are the best chance at getting prostitution decriminalized and legalized for both parties. A Conservative government would not do anything favourable for prostitution. In fact, it was the Conservatives under Harper that gave us the current laws around prostitution.
your delusions, just like the others on here about the Liberals are so utterly asinine

it's just sad

Trudeau is the most unethical PM we've ever had

he is our Donald Trump, look at what he's done, how, it's so similar to Trump's actions

they are both incompetent

prostitution laws, spare me

Harper, it was really that POS Peter MacKay, he's an anal control freak, his wife is a SJW for women's issues, he's a "supposed" religious type

and it only happened because of the Dom that took it to court, they were forced to come up with something else

or did you see them change our prostitution laws the previous 8 yrs while they were forcing all those women to take their pregnancies to full term?

when they weren't beating all the immigrants, forcing children to work in the mines, ect.....

and what have Justin (I can't tell the truth/I'm above the law) and his band of incompetents done in the last 4 yrs?

nothing, which is what they will do for another 4 yrs

past behaviour is a great predictor of future behaviour

Harper touched prostitution cause he was forced to

which is what the other parties would/will do

cause it is political shit, no one wants to deal with it, just like abortion

there is no general appetite for it, except on the fringes
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,543
7
0
Calgary
your delusions, just like the others on here about the Liberals are so utterly asinine

it's just sad

Trudeau is the most unethical PM we've ever had

he is our Donald Trump, look at what he's done, how, it's so similar to Trump's actions

they are both incompetent

prostitution laws, spare me

Harper, it was really that POS Peter MacKay, he's an anal control freak, his wife is a SJW for women's issues, he's a "supposed" religious type

and it only happened because of the Dom that took it to court, they were forced to come up with something else

or did you see them change our prostitution laws the previous 8 yrs while they were forcing all those women to take their pregnancies to full term?

when they weren't beating all the immigrants, forcing children to work in the mines, ect.....

and what have Justin (I can't tell the truth/I'm above the law) and his band of incompetents done in the last 4 yrs?

nothing, which is what they will do for another 4 yrs

past behaviour is a great predictor of future behaviour

Harper touched prostitution cause he was forced to

which is what the other parties would/will do

cause it is political shit, no one wants to deal with it, just like abortion

there is no general appetite for it, except on the fringes
Well said I will say.I sure as fuck wont vote for a Party Doctrine based on this destructive pastime....cant call it a "hobby" as a "hobby is constructive.

I want good qualified people in Government in key slots.....not gender balanced BULLSHIT because the joke of a PM is a "feminest".....I dont want idiots like McKenna aka Climate Barbie as Environment Minister when she is seriously out of her depth and clueless
who shows up for photo ops riding her bike on sunny days(oh those sunny ways) and the rest of the time goes to Parliament in a gas guzzling SUV on tax payer money.

I dont give a rats ass if the PM marches in a Pride Parade to pander to the alphabet VOTE.

I want good Governance and Fiscal Responsibility as I am getting raped in the ass as a tax payer.

When it comes down to brass tacks LE cracks down on Prostitution when it is a problem raised by the public in general.VPD/CPS/PCMP only resort to a crackdown when people bitch and complain.For Fuck Sakes the RCMP took how many years to nail down Pickton and that was a serious bad case of a guy killing street Hookers.....the LE is not too worried about prosecuting Prostitution....the time and paperwork is a PITA.

To vote in that direction and to re-elect Trudeau based on this sole policy which is not on the Lieberals "red book" is foolish at best and idiotic at worst.

SR
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,270
14
38
Vancouver
Trudeau is the most unethical PM we've ever had
He's a disappointment, but that might be a bit hyperbolic. I'd take him over, say, Mulroney. Maybe given time he'd accumulate more misdeeds to be a contender, but he hasn't been in power long enough to be the worst, and likely never will.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,977
890
113
Upstairs
Given Trudeau's TWO convctions for ethics breaches, and his obvious status as a pandering, walking photo op, I an't see why anyone would now vote for him.

But the biggest question as to remain - Why does SNC Lavalin hold such power over this government, given there hasn't been a shred of evidence even one job was at stake?
 

Lo-ki

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2011
4,015
2,621
113
Check your closet..:)
Given Trudeau's TWO convctions for ethics breaches, and his obvious status as a pandering, walking photo op, I an't see why anyone would now vote for him.

But the biggest question as to remain - Why does SNC Lavalin hold such power over this government, given there hasn't been a shred of evidence even one job was at stake?
They are in Quebec aren't they..??????
 

overdone

Banned
Apr 26, 2007
1,828
442
83
He's a disappointment, but that might be a bit hyperbolic. I'd take him over, say, Mulroney. Maybe given time he'd accumulate more misdeeds to be a contender, but he hasn't been in power long enough to be the worst, and likely never will.
really? what more could he have done in barely 4 yrs?

you seem to forget, Mark Norman, he was commenting on the case before the man was even charged, then he stated that it would go to court

he lies constantly

claims to be about science/facts, but only uses them when they fit his narrative

he groped a womans ass yrs ago, but he disagrees

that's his level of debate, like the old joke where the kid gets up at Debate Club, his rebuttal is

I Disagree

then sits down

Kenney when he called Justin's level of intelligence "the depth of a finger bowl"

no one disputed it, they just said it was mean/uncalled for

he claimed the Aga Khan was a friend, a friend he hadn't seen or spent time with

even Liberals, the one's who aren't sycophants, you know, like Trumps Republicans, are getting tired of him

and it's been less than 4yrs, like you said

he's an empty shell, a figure head, who will say anything

the Liberals know they're done without him, that's how shallow their pool is

he did it before while in opposition

said one thing in French another in English, depending on who he's trying to bribe, or being bribed by

that's one of his only real talents


HE WAS TAKING MONEY FROM PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS FOR SPEAKING, WHILE HE WAS COLLECTING A SALARY FOR BEING AN MP, (PRETTY MUCH THE DEFINITION OF THE JOB) WHEN HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

the manchild has never had any ethics

nothing is his fault

he has no equal

well south of the border he does

he's so similar to Trump, it's just sad

lies, law doesn't apply to him, incompetent, calls people names, ect...
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,543
7
0
Calgary
really? what more could he have done in barely 4 yrs?

you seem to forget, Mark Norman, he was commenting on the case before the man was even charged, then he stated that it would go to court

he lies constantly

claims to be about science/facts, but only uses them when they fit his narrative

he groped a womans ass yrs ago, but he disagrees

that's his level of debate, like the old joke where the kid gets up at Debate Club, his rebuttal is

I Disagree

then sits down

Kenney when he called Justin's level of intelligence "the depth of a finger bowl"

no one disputed it, they just said it was mean/uncalled for

he claimed the Aga Khan was a friend, a friend he hadn't seen or spent time with

even Liberals, the one's who aren't sycophants, you know, like Trumps Republicans, are getting tired of him

and it's been less than 4yrs, like you said

he's an empty shell, a figure head, who will say anything

the Liberals know they're done without him, that's how shallow their pool is

he did it before while in opposition

said one thing in French another in English, depending on who he's trying to bribe, or being bribed by

that's one of his only real talents


HE WAS TAKING MONEY FROM PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS FOR SPEAKING, WHILE HE WAS COLLECTING A SALARY FOR BEING AN MP, (PRETTY MUCH THE DEFINITION OF THE JOB) WHEN HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

the manchild has never had any ethics

nothing is his fault

he has no equal

well south of the border he does

he's so similar to Trump, it's just sad

lies, law doesn't apply to him, incompetent, calls people names, ect...
Hey now dont point out the obvious....that Trudeau lived a life of entitlement all of his life at the cost to his trust fund and since getting into politics via name recognition he has done the same but at tax payer expense.Dont say those things as you may "trigger"
loyal Lieberal voters who have been brainwashed and think his actions over Lavscam were just fine and dandy....same goes with Adscam when 250 million of tax payer money was siphoned off and fed to cronies and bagmen in Quebec.

All I can is going into this election is the media for the most part are not fawning over Trudeau and kissing his ass....in recent weeks they are out for blood as they should be.Say what you want about Harper with regards to controlling his caucus with whipped votes etc but he did not get flagged/nailed with multiple Ethics violations like Trudeau has.Nor did Harper act like an entitled "Prince" of Canada,his wife took care of the kids and did not have 2 nannies.

SR
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,270
14
38
Vancouver
This is kind of funny. I didn't say Trudeau was a good guy. I just said the hyperbole was unnecessary. But apparently not foaming at the mouth at the mention of his name is what you call "triggered" now? Strange days.
 

overdone

Banned
Apr 26, 2007
1,828
442
83
This is kind of funny. I didn't say Trudeau was a good guy. I just said the hyperbole was unnecessary. But apparently not foaming at the mouth at the mention of his name is what you call "triggered" now? Strange days.
yeah, that's part of the problem, you should be saying he isn't a good guy, loudly
he isn't even OK, average, he's a POS

his actions have repeatedly shown that time and time again

it should be obvious to anyone who isn't a Liberal Party Hack

and it affects everyone

he's turning our Country into a banana republic, just like Trump/US

he's actually implementing things that are going to affect us for yrs, negatively

triggered, no, pissed off by the udder stupidity, regardless of political stripe

of those who are saying this is nothing, no big deal

Harper was nothing compared to this POS, he had nothing on Trudeau's ways

put someone else in the Liberal seat, anyone

but this guy is dangerous, he's not a leader, he's a figurehead

an incompetent one

the list of his gaffs, stupidity, politically incorrect actions/reactions, in barely 4yrs is so long, it's not just sad, it's pathetic

his bribery, willingness to drown us in debt in perpetuity to achieve it, should alarm everyone

he's dangerous to our democracy, welfare, security, our way of life

he needs to be replaced and never heard from again

just common sense to anyone who's been awake for the last 3+yrs and isn't a LIBERAL HACK

any of the other 3 leaders would be a huge improvement, even May and the guy who no one knows his name

they all have more character/ethics in their little pinky than Trudeau does
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,543
7
0
Calgary
yeah, that's part of the problem, you should be saying he isn't a good guy, loudly
he isn't even OK, average, he's a POS

his actions have repeatedly shown that time and time again

it should be obvious to anyone who isn't a Liberal Party Hack

and it affects everyone

he's turning our Country into a banana republic, just like Trump/US

he's actually implementing things that are going to affect us for yrs, negatively

triggered, no, pissed off by the udder stupidity, regardless of political stripe

of those who are saying this is nothing, no big deal

Harper was nothing compared to this POS, he had nothing on Trudeau's ways

put someone else in the Liberal seat, anyone

but this guy is dangerous, he's not a leader, he's a figurehead

an incompetent one

the list of his gaffs, stupidity, politically incorrect actions/reactions, in barely 4yrs is so long, it's not just sad, it's pathetic

his bribery, willingness to drown us in debt in perpetuity to achieve it, should alarm everyone

he's dangerous to our democracy, welfare, security, our way of life

he needs to be replaced and never heard from again

just common sense to anyone who's been awake for the last 3+yrs and isn't a LIBERAL HACK

any of the other 3 leaders would be a huge improvement, even May and the guy who no one knows his name

they all have more character/ethics in their little pinky than Trudeau does
Well said I will say.In rebuttal I will say that an NDP or Green Federal Government would be a total disaster.The Greens are just plain nuts and the NDP are a shade to the right of outright communists.Read the NDP LEAP manifesto and even try to disagree with me.One of the biggest planks in it is wealth distribution.As in take from the "haves" who have worked for it,and give it to the "have nots" who have worked for nothing.In every Province the NDP have governed they have run that Province into the ground.Not to
mention the sheer overload of kickbacks/bribes/entitlements etc that has happened.Does not matter if it was BC/Alberta/Saskatchewan/Manitoba/Ontario the result was economic ruin.The only reason the Horgan lead NDP in BC are not up to their usual shennanigans is beacause they are being propped up by the Green party who are keeping a close eye on things.

Thankfully in Alberta the NDP only got 1 term and by accident.It will still take a long time to fix the damage done though.

SR
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,543
7
0
Calgary
What a surprise.The Lieberal dominated Ethics committee shut down all action by the opposition Party's.

OTTAWA — Liberal members of a parliamentary committee have blocked an opposition attempt to hear from ethics commissioner Mario Dion about his scathing report into Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's handling of the SNC-Lavalin affair.

Only one of six Liberal MPs on the 10-member House of Commons ethics committee supported a Conservative motion to call Dion, and possibly others, to testify about the report.
Advertisement
x

The lone Liberal outlier, Toronto MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, supported the motion only because he said he wanted Dion to explain what he considered the commissioner's "legally flawed" conclusion that Trudeau broke the Conflict of Interest Act.

Quebec MP Steven MacKinnon spoke for the other Liberal members, dismissing the motion as a blatantly partisan attempt to re-ignite public outrage over the SNC-Lavalin controversy on the eve an election call.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks to the media at the national press gallery regarding the SNC-Lavalin affairs in Ottawa, Ontario, on March 7, 2019. (LARS HAGBERG/AFP/Getty Images)© Getty Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks to the media at the national press gallery regarding the SNC-Lavalin affairs in Ottawa, Ontario, on March 7, 2019. (LARS HAGBERG/AFP/Getty Images)

Dion concluded in his report last week that Trudeau broke the Conflict of Interest Act by improperly pressuring former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould to halt a criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

Dion also disclosed in his report that he couldn't get all the information he required, as potential witnesses and Trudeau's office claimed cabinet confidence stopped from them from sharing everything they knew.

Trudeau has accepted the report and taken full responsibility for mistakes that were made, but he has also disagreed with Dion's conclusion and resolutely refused to apologize for what he characterizes as standing up for Canadian jobs.

Conservatives and New Democrats pushed for the emergency committee meeting held Wednesday afternoon on Parliament Hill. Dion had said he would make himself available to testify, and would have done so by video conference.

On Wednesday morning, Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer reiterated his call for the Liberals to put partisan interests ahead of their own and let the study proceed.

"We will learn today whether or not scandal and corruption is limited to just the Liberal party's leader in the form of Justin Trudeau, or whether or not this rot has infected the entire Liberal caucus and the entire Liberal party," Scheer said at an event in Richmond Hill, Ont.

Scheer said that if the study fails to go ahead, he hopes to be able to convince voters to hold Trudeau accountable on voting day this October.

"We cannot have a lawmaker who is a lawbreaker."

Trudeau has suggested voters want to move on.

The Canadian Press


This a fucking joke.Never before has ANY Canadian Prime Minister has been hit with Ethics Violations and Trudeau has done it twice in 1 term.Do you seriously want to give this entitled asshole 4 more years of power?

Argue the FACTS if you can.

SR
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,543
7
0
Calgary
Even more of a joke.

MONTREAL — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Canada will seek dialogue with China but won't back down in its defence of Canadians against what he calls an increasingly assertive global power.
In a speech Wednesday in Montreal, Trudeau said the federal government is closely monitoring developments in Hong Kong, where there are 300,000 Canadian citizens.
He stressed the need for restraint and respect of the right to peaceful assembly in the face of protests that have rocked the semi-independent Chinese territory.
"Canadians expect us to be unwavering in our commitment to human rights, while upholding the paramount importance of international law," Trudeau said.
© THE CANADIAN PRESS/Paul ChiassonCanada's relationship with China is fraught with tension over Canada's arrest of Chinese telecom executive Meng Wanzhou, and China's subsequent detention of two Canadians, allegedly for national security reasons.
Trudeau said the government is working to obtain the release of businessman Michael Spavor and former diplomat Michael Kovrig, who were detained in China in December shortly after Meng was arrested at the Vancouver airport to face possible extradition to the United States.
"As a global community, we must recognize that China is a growing power and increasingly assertive towards its place in the international order," Trudeau told the audience at the Montreal Council on Foreign Relations.
"But make no mistake: we will always defend Canadians and Canadian interests."
The prime minister cited the country's history of successful diplomacy with larger nations and said Canada has generated widespread international support for its effort to have Spavor and Kovrig released.
"We do not escalate, but we do not back down," he said.
The Canadian Press.


For fuck sakes cant anyone realize that Trudeau is just trying to finish the work of his father.

If you would vote for the guy you are pretty much taking up a knife and plunging it into the HEART of Canada...encouraging the country to just DIE.

SR
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,019
191
63
So, where was the Ethics Commissioner of Canada when trade treaties were sending Canadian jobs overseas to be done my marginalized labour? Didn't hear about the Ethics Commissioner of Canada finding fault in the number of oligarchs that got rich off the backs of marginalized labour overseas and coming to Canada and bid up the price of real estate that puts home ownership out of reach for the younger generation of Canadians.
 

Hugh Jass

Banned
May 11, 2015
306
1
16
Interesting timing to be starting work on Transmountain. Pipe is stacked up and ready to go out by the Abbottsford Airport visible from the freeway.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/trans-mountain-mobilizes-workforce-start-171548073.html

Dont see this helping Justin get any votes. No Conservative is likely to switch to vote Liberal and it may cost the Libs votes to the Greens as apparently they will be starting construction at the Burnaby terminal in Sept/Oct pre election. No one is switching their votes to the irrelevant NDP.

This will enrage Canine Cowboy.
 

JimDandy

Well-known member
May 17, 2004
3,085
656
113
68
Lower Mainland, B.C.
I met with my other sister the other day (the one that does NOT work for the Catholic Church) and she put forward her opinion that Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott were not "team players" when they created the issues for the Liberal government in general and Trudeau specifically. I was surprised with her opinion, because she is a very strong "women's rights" advocate. But she is also a pragmotist and I must say that I totally agree with her view. We both also believe that these 2 women have set back progress for women in Canadian politics in a signficant way. I suspect that other Canadian political parties have noted what happened and will be much more carefull in the future assigning important portfolios to women . And of course, the recent findings by the ethics committee would never have occurred if Jody Wilson-Raybould had played ball.

Now before you jump all over me, I do not disagree that perhaps Jody Wilson-Raybould was correct in her opinion of what was asked of her by Trueau and company. But I firmly believe that the vast majoirty of male politicians, if put in the same position, would have either held their nose and agreed to play ball or at the very least would ahve made sure that the whole scenario of disagreement would nevery have gone public. Jody Wilson-Raybould has caused a great deal of grief for the Liberal party that she could have avoided, but chose instead to publically air, inorder to make herself look like a martyr.

And this is why I do not care at all about the finding of the ethics committee, because I strongly suspect other politicians, both Liberal and Conservative, have done very similar things, but these actions never saw the light of day, because they had ministers that were first and foremost "team players".

JD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Vancouver Escorts