Honey, Ivy or Mandi

All very different girls. What do you look for in an SP?

Why not see HIM?

I prefer younger girls so I would say Ivy but I haven't seen Mandi.

Honey Honey Honey....

No doubt in my mind, and by the often highly reviewed, I would suggest you see Honey. Not only is her body totally hot, toned and sexy, she has a very pretty face and that smile! She definitely is my favourite SP. I get a hard on just thinking of her (wanted to see her last night and tonight, but she had those nights off. Saturday, Honey, I am c*ming to see you!). Take a look if you like, you'll see she was voted as the best SP at BBC for overall looks, attitude and service. She is sweet, energetic, a real pleaser and fcuking the best at turning me on. Read some of the reviews on Honey.

Rain, i would go with Honey too. i have not seen the other two but i have no urge to. Honey is just that good.

+1 Honey! She'll rock your world. I'm getting hard just thinking of my time with her.

Big Ivy fan here, but Honey is a great girl too and probably the best reviewed of the BBC girls.

Not to confuse the issue, but there is also Katie....and Emma....and Mia....and Loni....and Amber....and should I go on? BBC is a pretty safe bet, regardless of whose working. Krista has got some sweet, dependable, consistent and sexy girls working with her.

Have fun!!!

Highclass500????

How about NO-CLASS!!! Dec. 2005 membership (probably at the arse end of the month) so probable membership on PERb of 20 days. Three posts. All on Honey. Give me a fucking break. PLEASE!!

Shill. Shill. Shill.

If I've missed something here or I am "out of line" I'd welcome a "crack across my cranium" or a supporting post to show these fucking idiots they can't get away with this obvious shit.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the supporting legitimate posts of DLaw, American Male and Newbee reflect very positive posts on Honey. So, my comments don't reflect on Honey. D

bigguy

tough call

had some wild honey last week - unpasteurized, very delicious well worth their gfe rate.

just came back from some ivy tonight - very fresh, young soft body, needs a little time to warm up to the session. unfortunately we were too busy talking half the time (perhaps that was her plan?) - so whether the service reflects her gfe rate on this particular night is questionable. but i think she is worth another visit - maybe it gets better or maybe i am just a sucker for a young thing.

havent had the pleasure of meeting mandi.

btw, try to shower before you go there. their shower takes forever to warm up - i ended up taking a cold shower, which is not the best thing to do before a session.

Merriam-Webster online:

Main Entry: 1shill
Pronunciation: 'shil
Function: intransitive verb
Etymology: 2shill
1 : to act as a shill
2 : to act as a spokesperson or promoter <the eminent Shakespearean producer, director, actor and star... is now shilling for a brokerage house -- Andy Rooney>

Bigguy, i really dont see anywhere in this definition of shill something saying that he who joined more than a month ago is no longer considered a possible shill.

(with that being said, it is possible that im a shill. im not. i saw her in the middle of december and had a great time. 'nuff said.)

if highclass500 had that few posts and no one else was saying the exact same thing he was or if the girl he was praising was unheard of, then yes, perhaps it is ok to call shill. just because he joined a little while ago, doesnt mean he is automatically a shill.


there is no point in calling shill on someone who has many great reviews by many guys as Honey. or one of the guys who is giving the great review.

bigguy said:

How about NO-CLASS!!! Dec. 2005 membership (probably at the arse end of the month) so probable membership on PERb of 20 days. Three posts. All on Honey. Give me a fucking break. PLEASE!!

Shill. Shill. Shill.

If I've missed something here or I am "out of line" I'd welcome a "crack across my cranium" or a supporting post to show these fucking idiots they can't get away with this obvious shit.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the supporting legitimate posts of DLaw, American Male and Newbee reflect very positive posts on Honey. So, my comments don't reflect on Honey. D

bigguy

Click to expand...

Maybe I have a slightly different take on shilling than some. Since Honey is so well respected in town and has so many good reviews, it seems silly to accuse anyone of shilling for her. She just doesn't need that in order to get clients. Honey gets clients because she's an awesome SP.

The sort of SPs who need someone to shill for them are those without good review, those with shaky reputations. Or new girls who have not made a name yet in any direction. Or those girls who are not seeing as many clients as they would like and need to get things going. These sort of girls are the ones that need guys to shill for them. And occasionally, some guy falls for a sob story and writes a review of a SP, just to be nice. The worst, of course, are the SPs who pretend to be former clients and write reviews of themselves.

So, while hiclass500 might need to get out a little more and start seeing some others SPs in town besides Honey, I honestly don't think he's a shill.

So, bigguy, maybe you might have encouraged hiclass500 to see some girls at other MP or perhaps tell him he needs to diversify a bit or something. But jumping on the guy and calling him no class seems a little bit harsh.

Besides, the thread was started by Rain Man and his question about three of BBC's girls. You sort of hijacked the thread away from him.

You know, we all get passionate about stuff. God knows I get jacked about stuff on here myself. I think your just a passionate and sensative guy under all of your hard exterior. So take my advice, bigguy. Go light up a nice scented candle, (lavender is always nice) put on a nice relaxing Michael Buble CD, grab a glass of Chardonnay and put your feet up. You'll feel like yourself in no time.

Yo American Male:

Thanks for your well-intended advice. Bubble baths don't work for me and Michael Bubbel(sp?) doesn't quite do it either being a bit longer-in-the-tooth than most PERBites. My post never was a negative reflection on either BBC or Honey. I have little enthusiasm to debate this matter and don't want to appear overly arbitrary.

In hindsight, my post was triggered because of highclass500's obvious (to me) repetitive singlemindedness re Honey, plus the newness of membership and, probably most importantly, all his/her comments appeared to be from an articulate and intelligent source. For me to advise him/her to broaden his/her horizon would have been a mite presumptious on my part. (I concede I could be accused of having acted presumptiously in my post.) My reaction to HC500's postings were on the basis he/she didn't need any unsolicited advice from me as the HC500's agenda was pretty obvious to me.

Time will tell whether HC500 is guilty as accused as we'll judge by any future contributions from that source. If we hear nothing more from HC500, at that point I'd simply say "I rest my case."

My work is done. And I will work on this "hard exterior" thing if that is the common perception on PERB.

bigguy

Okay, admittedly I'm in a foul mood, but rather than call someone who answers an unanswerable question a shill, I'm more tempted to call the asker a shill. That's why I didn't give a straight answer to start with. Why the fuck are we supposed to make someone's decisions for them? Do you want us to hold your hand while you walk into BBC, too? "Who should I pick" is one of those stupid questions asked on message boards that has no answer. Presumably you narrowed you choices down to three by past reviews or by viewing their pictures. Beyond that, nobody but you knows what you want, so just pick somebody and tell us about it. Should you inhale a lungful of fresh air in the morning, or a pail of water? Well, I'd recommend the air because it will keep you alive, but maybe you're a sadist who gets off on the discomfort, or suicidal and would prefer the face full of water. It's your choice, but we can't help you with your choice. I was one of the first to rave about Honey, but maybe you prefer bigger busts, a lot less talking and dark hair. Maybe the guy with three posts, all great reviews of one person has only seen that one. Doesn't make him a shill.I don't think the question should even be asked. Do your homework, grow a couple and go for it. If they all have good reviews, how difficult can it be to make a fucking decision?

this sounds like it could get exciting.

This is really Paul Martin, isn't it?

hi rain man,

i haven't seen any of the girls but i was in the sp chat room the other night n had a pleasure of chatting with ivy. i can say that i like her personality based on the chat. n next time i'm in vancouver, i'll pay her a visit.

hope u all the fun with ur choice.

Cock Throppled said:

Why the fuck are we supposed to make someone's decisions for them? Do you want us to hold your hand while you walk into BBC, too? "Who should I pick" is one of those stupid questions asked on message boards that has no answer.

Click to expand...

C.T. I don't think he was looking for anyone to make a decision for him. I think he was looking for advice after he had done some research and wanted to get a concensus of opinions. Not the way perhaps you and I would make a decision, but still, a valid approach. Ivy and Honey are obviously well-reviewed and Mandi is damn cute with sexy long legs. He had narrowed his choices (my take anyway) and now was looking for a little help to make a final selection.

We're all different, we all have different approaches to doing things. I would go about things like this, but its okay if someone takes this approach. Different strokes for different penises....