15 solid minutes of DATY… wow, my tongue would get a little sore.
(reddog`s review, https://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=79728&page=2;)
Sometimes pooners report on their tenacious effort to turn on an SP—and they seem to leave with a sense of failure if they can’t.
Myself, turning providers on or bringing them to orgasm isn’t a burden I care to shoulder, though it’s nice when it happens as a byproduct of enjoying myself.
Based on my experiments so far (an investment of about 7 grand) I personally find providers fall into 3 main camps:
—“Resisters” get incentive and satisfaction only from money, seem to feel strong inner resistance to their work, provide poor service with lots of pleasure-killing restrictions, show no affection, and are almost impossible to turn on.
—“Pleasers” don’t usually get turned on much themselves, but get satisfaction from making a client happy, and they play along willingly with most requests; and some are also good at showing affection.
—“Whoopers” (my word, for lack of finding a better one) also get satisfaction from a client’s happiness, but they don’t just aim to please but like to whoop it up with a client for their own erotic pleasure. They tend to be easily, demonstratively, orgasmic; take adventurous initiative; give you a sense that the enjoyment is mutual and that they really appreciate your company and not just the money; and the best of them pamper you with both passion and affection.
I agree, of course, that the same provider may behave very differently with different pooners—but I suspect most providers have a basic attitude which doesn’t differ all that much from one respectful, clean, friendly-looking pooner to the next.
Most of my SPs have been pleasers (and that’s really the secret of typical Asian providers’ appeal: not that they are submissive, but that they seem so willing to give a client pleasure by using their body as if it were the most natural thing in the world).
It seems to me quixotic to try hard to turn on a resister or a pleaser; and in the case of a “whooper,” well, there’s really no need to work hard at it.
(reddog`s review, https://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=79728&page=2;)
Sometimes pooners report on their tenacious effort to turn on an SP—and they seem to leave with a sense of failure if they can’t.
Myself, turning providers on or bringing them to orgasm isn’t a burden I care to shoulder, though it’s nice when it happens as a byproduct of enjoying myself.
Based on my experiments so far (an investment of about 7 grand) I personally find providers fall into 3 main camps:
—“Resisters” get incentive and satisfaction only from money, seem to feel strong inner resistance to their work, provide poor service with lots of pleasure-killing restrictions, show no affection, and are almost impossible to turn on.
—“Pleasers” don’t usually get turned on much themselves, but get satisfaction from making a client happy, and they play along willingly with most requests; and some are also good at showing affection.
—“Whoopers” (my word, for lack of finding a better one) also get satisfaction from a client’s happiness, but they don’t just aim to please but like to whoop it up with a client for their own erotic pleasure. They tend to be easily, demonstratively, orgasmic; take adventurous initiative; give you a sense that the enjoyment is mutual and that they really appreciate your company and not just the money; and the best of them pamper you with both passion and affection.
I agree, of course, that the same provider may behave very differently with different pooners—but I suspect most providers have a basic attitude which doesn’t differ all that much from one respectful, clean, friendly-looking pooner to the next.
Most of my SPs have been pleasers (and that’s really the secret of typical Asian providers’ appeal: not that they are submissive, but that they seem so willing to give a client pleasure by using their body as if it were the most natural thing in the world).
It seems to me quixotic to try hard to turn on a resister or a pleaser; and in the case of a “whooper,” well, there’s really no need to work hard at it.





