Tracy on EC
- Thread starter Phoenix
- Start date
Guys,
I just tried out "Tracy" on Sunday, and you guys were right, the one who came to my room was not the one on EC, not as pretty as the pic tho. But the girl came to my room was not bad tho, I think she is about early 20s, she did everything for me and pretty new in businees(a little bit shy). I dunno if anyone else would try out in the future. But pm mi if you guys want more info.
Matrix
I just tried out "Tracy" on Sunday, and you guys were right, the one who came to my room was not the one on EC, not as pretty as the pic tho. But the girl came to my room was not bad tho, I think she is about early 20s, she did everything for me and pretty new in businees(a little bit shy). I dunno if anyone else would try out in the future. But pm mi if you guys want more info.
Matrix
guys it is tough taking one for the team >>>>> I have done it and have only have success with Pandora. Other than that I won't take anymore chances
Sloth
Sloth
DONEMatrix said:Phoenix, would you mind sending my pm to bomber? (too lazy to type)...
Matrix
Ok
Matrix said:Hey Packet clear your pm box and Phoenix, would you mind sending my pm to bomber? (too lazy to type)...
Matrix
I asked a couple questions earlier and no one has really answered them. Please help me out, guys. I am supposed to meet her later this week, but if she is not who she appears to be, then I am going to save myself some money and say "No thanks, lady, go play Checkers with someone else."
From what i have heard matrix seemed to have not too bad of time but he was not sure if it was the sp that was advertised on ec.he was happy with what showed up though.i believe it is a agency so i thinks you might want to be careful with the bait and switch.
Alan's decision
Alan;
It sounds like no one really knows for sure about Tracy. Here's what we know for sure:
The pictures on EC is of a real hot looking babe.
This is not who's been coming to the appointments. Since we know that the person coming to the sessions is not the lady in the E.C. picture, the agency or s/p could send just about anybody to your session.
So I think you could sum things up as:
at best YMMV and worst you could be TOFTT.
Alan;
It sounds like no one really knows for sure about Tracy. Here's what we know for sure:
The pictures on EC is of a real hot looking babe.
This is not who's been coming to the appointments. Since we know that the person coming to the sessions is not the lady in the E.C. picture, the agency or s/p could send just about anybody to your session.
So I think you could sum things up as:
at best YMMV and worst you could be TOFTT.
Thanks Cappy1 and Bomber for your input. I would appreciate a detailed description of this woman and some indication of whether she seems easy to get along with, etc. I will not be taking one for the team, so if the lady who shows up is substantially different from the pics, she will be looking for a new Checkers opponent. I will send her on her way nicely, of course, but she will be sent on her way! I am not paying for a second stringer when I expect a Masters Checkers Champion.
Still looking for information/description...
I understand your point, Phoenix. I would still like to have some serious descriptive info on this lady. My standard position is that when I ask for an advertised Checkers player, that's what I expect to get. If I want a monopoly player I'll ask for one. The main point I am trying to make is that I don't like people playing games with me and I don't appreciate people who play games with others without that someone's consent. I want what I want and that's all I will accept in a Checkers opponent! Hopefully, I will be able to provide a good review of this opponent's game strategy and moves early next week.
I understand your point, Phoenix. I would still like to have some serious descriptive info on this lady. My standard position is that when I ask for an advertised Checkers player, that's what I expect to get. If I want a monopoly player I'll ask for one. The main point I am trying to make is that I don't like people playing games with me and I don't appreciate people who play games with others without that someone's consent. I want what I want and that's all I will accept in a Checkers opponent! Hopefully, I will be able to provide a good review of this opponent's game strategy and moves early next week.
Alan
I wasn't making any point, I just like the way you phrase your posts and I just had to add to it.lol
I also want to try Tracy but will wait until there is more information on her and I know that I'll get what I ordered.
I wasn't making any point, I just like the way you phrase your posts and I just had to add to it.lol
I also want to try Tracy but will wait until there is more information on her and I know that I'll get what I ordered.
