luckydog71 said:
There are things our gov't does that they should not do.
Medicare / Medicaid / social security / dept of education / twisted and deformed income tax laws to name a few.
The feds need to focus on national defense (including our borders), national monetary policy, federal crimes, civil liberties, state department, IRS but very much reduced, social welfare for those who can not take care of themselves.
Let state and local gov't pick up some if the local citizenry decides they want to. Do you know how much money I would have if the gov't did not take social security payments from me? Far more than I will ever get in payments.
I can certainly see where you are coming from with regard to things you don't want gov to get involved with.
Medicare/aid - people should simply take care of themselves. One should not have to pay for another's poor health. But without a national compensatory or pooling system, it leaves health care affordability in the hands of private insurers. This means someone is making a profit from the health of American citizens. And as you know, there is absolutely no guarantee that profits are reinvested into the American economy - there is too much temptation to put investment offshore. If people understood that someone was profiting from providing them with the ability to afford healthcare, surely they would find it unethical. The only alternative is a government managed system that removes the profit motive.
Social security - typically this means things such as pensions, but also is in the realm of unemployment premiums. On the latter, people should put enough in to their savings to overcome times that they may find themselves unemployed. No one should have to pay for another's misfortune or for those who are inept or lazy. But economists recognize such things as business cycles which affect the rate of unemployment, and that the rate of unemployment will never be zero because of the structure of the economy. This means that a fair fraction of hard working Americans with every intention to earn their keep will still fall prey to unemployment. Unemployment compensations help to smooth over rough edges of the economy and keep spending up, thereby contributing to a less bumpy business cycle and therefore less unemployed. Since regulating the economy is the role of government, so should regulating or even managing unemployment premiums/compensation. As for the former, pensions, a life's work should produce the fruit of a comfortable retirement. Here is where we are probably in the most agreement, for no matter how much assistance one has received from the Fed over one's working lifetime, in the end it is ultimately the individual's responsibility. Thus in the end, at retirement, Americans need to look after their own keep.
Dept of Education - I don't think gov should really be involved in social engineering, but there are times when it is necessary, such as the promotion of civil rights for blacks, or equality of education standards for all Americans regardless of class or creed. Without a government managed system of education, education standards and egalitarian ideals would fall prey to corporate funders - where sufficient standards and ideals would never be met.
Too bad all this shit costs money, and too bad one must stare at the deductions out of each of our paychecks. But civil society in a first-class country is costly. If you want no taxes taken off, then look towards a more backward country like China where there is rampant poverty and no social structure to prevent chaos except totalitarianism.