what does everyone think? bold statement? after hearing that radio interview i think the u.s. could do much worse seeing as how they are doing much worse currently.
Where the fuck have you been? Who the hell has NOT been criticising people looting electronics? Who in their right mind hasn't been critical of gangs raping women? Who isn't appalled by rescuers being shot at? What kind of blind right wing rhetoric even makes someone think that way? You accuse liberals of ignoring all of the above? Do you know the meanings of delusional, paranoid and irrational?luckydog71 said:So let me take a shot at the politically correct left. You are not critical of the looter (not those taking food and water). You are not critical of those who were shooting police, national guardsmen, and rescuers. You are not critical of those who raped women and young girls in the shelters. You are not critical of the ones who shoved the weak and the young out of the way so they could get on the bus first.
Why not?
smackyo said:we are getting off topic people. i say ray nagin for president. in addition all this shit about bush having to wait for approval is a load of shit. its up to a leader to know when to act.
example: iraq, not the time to act.
: new orleans, the time to act.
Umm, while it is true that local and state authorities should have emergency plans, and be able to react - when it comes to large, catastrophic events, is it not the federal government who is responsible for helping the aftermath?luckydog71 said:Most Americans, Gonzo is an exception, do not look to the federal government for everything.
Yeah, so are all the "lefties" in Louisiana - who almost unanimously supported GWB in the election about a year ago.luckydog71 said:It is also not surprising that the lefties come out of the wood work after the fact yelling it 's George’s fault….it’s George’s fault.
C'mon, LD, that's bullshit and you know it. I know you're pissed, but that doesn't mean you have to be stupid, tooluckydog71 said:So let me take a shot at the politically correct left. You are not critical of the looter (not those taking food and water). You are not critical of those who were shooting police, national guardsmen, and rescuers. You are not critical of those who raped women and young girls in the shelters. You are not critical of the ones who shoved the weak and the young out of the way so they could get on the bus first.
Why not?
In my opinion it is because they were mostly blacks and God knows a liberal can not be critical of an African-American….unless of course they have gone conservative.
pretty sure he is more diplomatic then bush. when his city is falling apart and chaos is the rule of law and the people that are supposed to be doing something are not then what do you expect the man to do? call a civillized press confrence and politely ask for help?lenharper said:Ray Nagin has shown himself lacking in the basic diplomatic skills to be a president. Bush doesn't have them either so I guess why not....
The federal emergency planning for this was privatized, and handed over to a big GOP campaign contributor. No wonder there was no effective federal presence.Bill45 said:Anyone notice all the NO school buses all up under water? Or, that the NO levee board owns a jet, a marina and a casino, but lousy levees? How about the genius that directed everyone to the dome but did not provide water, food, medical care, police protection. did not protect the hospitals, and did not ask his governor for help BEFORE Katrina struck? The fist pointing the finger has more fingers pointing at the pointer. Folks, the buck stops with the mayor and his people.
good call herb. i meant mine was a bold statement calling for him as pres., as for the radio interview check this treads first page.Herb_The_Perb said:The federal emergency planning for this was privatized, and handed over to a big GOP campaign contributor. No wonder there was no effective federal presence.






