The Porn Dude

Liberals to Debate Decriminalizing Prostitution

SirLoin

New member
Sep 10, 2004
9
0
0
Vancouver
From the Globe and Mail:


A motion to decriminalize prostitution is likely to be one of the more hotly debated items on the agenda for this weekend's Liberal policy convention.

The resolution has been put forward by the Young Liberals of Canada, who say they want to improve the safety of sex workers.

Prostitution is not illegal in Canada, but several Criminal Code prohibitions restrict the way business is conducted. For example, it's illegal to operate a so-called bawdy house, or to communicate for the purposes of prostitution. It is also forbidden to procure customers for a prostitute.

"We believe that what this does is it forces sex trade workers into a position where they have to hide themselves and try to avoid the public eye and put them in dangerous situations," Jason Cherniak, a Young Liberal National executive member, told globeandmail.com.

"What we're proposing is get rid of what's in the Criminal Code now because it isn't working and come up with something else."

The resolution asks that section 213 of the Code, which forbids communicating for the purposes of sex related acts, be removed.

The resolution will be debated at a workshop on Saturday at the Liberal Biennial Convention. It says, in part, that criminalizing acts related to the sex trade perpetuates a negative social stigma for these workers and calls on the government to recognize that prostitution is a "profession central to the subsistence of many Canadian citizens who deserve the same workplace safety and social respect as any other member of our society."

Mr. Cherniak also said members of the Young Liberals executive want to ensure that incidents like the disappearance of sex workers in Vancouver and in Edmonton won't happen again.

"Whereas we must never again have the tragedy of 50 women missing from Vancouver's downtown eastside without notice," the resolution reads.

The resolution will be debated on Saturday at the Ottawa convention as one of five issues on justice. If it is chosen out of the five as the priority resolution, it will proceed to be voted on at the policy plenary. Resolutions adopted at that plenary become official party policy.

Mr. Cherniak says the sex trade resolution may get more attention because the issue has been in the media lately.

Just this week, a subcommittee of the House of Commons justice committee announced they will travel to seedy areas in Toronto, Montreal, Halifax, Vancouver, Edmonton and Winnipeg this month in the first public review of Canada's prostitution laws in 20 years. It's part of a wide-ranging study on the adequacy of current Criminal Code provisions relating to prostitution.

And late last year, a Victoria Liberal MLA proposed a red-light district in the city, which was shot down by B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell and its mayor, Alan Lowe. Sheila Orr suggested that the prostitutes be given a designated street or streets in a more industrial part of the city with no residential homes. The proposal has not gathered much steam since last fall because Mr. Lowe does not want to have a debate on the matter, Ms. Orr told globeandmail.com Tuesday.

Ms. Orr also said Tuesday she supports the Liberal resolution but won't be attending the convention because the B.C. legislature is in session.

She said it's becoming increasingly obvious that the issue needs to be debated and addressed in Canada and that the Criminal Code must be revisited.

"There is a large gulf between the Criminal Code and on-the-ground law. A huge gulf," she said.

As well, she said the sex trade in Canada isn't going away and the time has come for those workers to be given the rights of other workers in Canada.

Mr. Cherniak said he didn't know what the chances were that the resolution on sex worker rights would move ahead for a vote on the convention floor on Sunday, as it is against several other strong justice issues including decriminalizing marijuana and increasing penalties for grow operations.

However, he said it's important to bring ideas such as this to the Liberal biennial convention.

"I don't think it's radical. I think it's something that people have been talking about. At this particular convention I think it's the most unexpected," he said.

With a report from Jane Armstrong and Bill Curry
 

HaywoodJabloemy

Dissident
Mar 6, 2004
254
0
0
Never the safest place
The federal Liberal Party should probably just ignore this issue at their convention because, as the article mentions, there is already an all-party Parliamentary subcommittee in the process of examining the prostitution laws, and they will have an initial report making recommendations on changes in June.

It's the bawdy house law that would need to be changed to allow legal brothels, not the public communicating law.

I find it bizarre that the first thing the politicians always suggest is allowing street prostitution and red light districts. I don't hear many SPs or guys eagerly demanding the right to participate in street prostitution. And who is asking that all the MPs, incalls, etc., be closed down where they are now, so that they can all be forced into some pointless red light district? Certainly no one in the general public wants it in their neighbourhood - so, who wants this?

I understand the idea that some put forward is that if public soliciting was made legal, the street walkers would work together and write down license plate numbers of johns' cars. Is it a realistic expectation that most of these women still on the street in 2005 would be capable of organizing and sticking to schedules to work with each other and be diligently keeping records of license plates and times of pick-ups? Since no one would want their area to be the one designated for it, I doubt it would ever happen, so discussing whether to allow street prostitution is likely a waste of energy since it will lead to nothing.

Changing the bawdy house law to allow incalls and the MPs to legally operate as bordellos is a more worthwhile debate. It's what has been done already in New Zealand and most of Australia, and fits in with what already exists in Canada, with no need for red light districts or anything else that's radical or new that would frighten people into thinking a part of their city would be ruined.

BTW, in today's Victoria Times Colonist: Time to update prostitution laws
 
Last edited:
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts