Do Service Providers Now Rule the Board?
- Thread starter bigmoe69er
- Start date
- Status
this is funny
But, I also see the reviewers reviewing the same sps in order to let the other reviewers just how much better they are: gave the sp more orgasms, got more sogs, she begs for greek (even tho she never does it), offers bbbjs (even tho no one else gets that, but I sure did, yep), paid less, got more time, went overtime, asked to stay the night, asked to get married, and so on.
It's either that or a good review gets shot down because a previous reviewer did not get a good session (attitude or hygiene?) and wants to discredit to positive reviewer, in order to bury it forever or leave a bad vibe on the sp just because they didn't get everything they thought they were entitled to. (Not to take away from the legitimate rip-off sps, of course. But just because she doesn't do rimming doesn't mean her service sucks, after all).
Hopefully not everyone sees the sp/client relationship so confrontational and adversarial. Why would you choose to see sps at all if you have such a bad attitude before you even start?
Shouldn't y'all just want to have a good time?
But add to that, I don't think that threads should be able to be disappeared so completely all the time. It makes things very confusing lol. If it's just drama, leave it alone. If it is defamatory, false or against the board's policies, then that should be the only reason. But just being the subject of a thread and asking for it to be gone doesn't seem sufficient. (And I still don't believe that a reviewer can't post contact info in a review just because they aren't a paid advertiser. That is just odd.)
The day that SPs had the power to remove or refuse to be reviewed was the beginning of the end. After that it started to slowly turn into a forum for pathetic sycophants who can't make friends elsewhere, so they resort to kissing ass to hos. so that they can be told how good a lay they are the next time they see them
But, I also see the reviewers reviewing the same sps in order to let the other reviewers just how much better they are: gave the sp more orgasms, got more sogs, she begs for greek (even tho she never does it), offers bbbjs (even tho no one else gets that, but I sure did, yep), paid less, got more time, went overtime, asked to stay the night, asked to get married, and so on.
It's either that or a good review gets shot down because a previous reviewer did not get a good session (attitude or hygiene?) and wants to discredit to positive reviewer, in order to bury it forever or leave a bad vibe on the sp just because they didn't get everything they thought they were entitled to. (Not to take away from the legitimate rip-off sps, of course. But just because she doesn't do rimming doesn't mean her service sucks, after all).
Hopefully not everyone sees the sp/client relationship so confrontational and adversarial. Why would you choose to see sps at all if you have such a bad attitude before you even start?
Shouldn't y'all just want to have a good time?But add to that, I don't think that threads should be able to be disappeared so completely all the time. It makes things very confusing lol. If it's just drama, leave it alone. If it is defamatory, false or against the board's policies, then that should be the only reason. But just being the subject of a thread and asking for it to be gone doesn't seem sufficient. (And I still don't believe that a reviewer can't post contact info in a review just because they aren't a paid advertiser. That is just odd.)
Last edited:
I dont see the relationship as confrontational nor should it be, but what you have to keep in mind is whats pleasure for us is business for them. This being the case, some might oppose a negative review or not want to be reviewed at all. I also think that we should be able to post rviews from non advertisers. This is called an escort review board not a ho advertising board.Hopefully not everyone sees the sp/client relationship so confrontational and adversarial. Why would you choose to see sps at all if you have such a bad attitude before you even start?
A fair and respectful negative review can be a heads up to her, seeing what works or doesn't work (like Misty, for example, responding to negative comments by promising to do better, or to keep the room cooler, etc).
But we all see what kind of things bostich does and that sort of thing isn't at all helpful. And if a reviewer wants to make a positive post in someone's negative review, they should be able to do so without being slammed for it. The sp is good for them, not good for the OP. Let it flow.
Lots of people are in businesses that they enjoy, and customers attitudes can make or break the day.
Last edited:
"Jaime" the Paranoid Stalker
---Dr. Moe
You are a nasty, profane, and ignorant woman, "Jaime". I want NOTHING to do with you. You deserve to be banned from this board. Let's see if Fred and the mods have the guts to do it.
---Dr. Moe
Children
Sometimes I get so tired of you children, especially your conspiracy theories.
Simple solution guys, you don't like the board, then leave, we can manage just fine without you. Oh wait, but is the opposite true? I don't think so, because if it was you would have left a long time ago.
BcMod is getting cranky these days. Thread closed.
Sometimes I get so tired of you children, especially your conspiracy theories.
Simple solution guys, you don't like the board, then leave, we can manage just fine without you. Oh wait, but is the opposite true? I don't think so, because if it was you would have left a long time ago.
BcMod is getting cranky these days. Thread closed.
- Status
