Have you seen how many Senators are in their 80s?
The US (and Canada) need term limits.
I am not a fan of the term limited for elected officials, for this reason:
The voters can get rid of them at any election. As long as they are able to get support from their party enough to get nominated, and get support from voters to be re-elected, why toss them out arbitrarily.
Do incumbents have an advantage? In some ways, but that seems more like a need for better campaign financing laws and restrictions against things like gerrymandering.
Perhaps the terms for them could be reduced in scope (6 years seems fucking weird), and the timing of their elections made more rational, but that still does not count as a term limit.
It's one of the few jobs where the "customers" are your real boss and can fire you if they get fed up.
The US Supreme Court, on the other hand, is a lifetime appointment, and as some of their recent actions make clear, some of them act like the legal system they supervise does not even apply to them.
They are appointed by elected political officials, but used basically to just act like partisans and warp the laws to whatever political side appointed them until they finally die; this also means the politicians can use them to make the kind of policies that could never pass muster with the voters if anyone ever bothered to ask them. The recent trend is to appoint people who have been judges for only a few months after coming straight out of activist factories like Liberty University.
It's such a broken system, designed for partisan manipulation and personal corruption.
(As for what Canada needs, I'll keep that confined to the Canada thread.)






