Actually, I believe the real issues that the teachers have with bill 22 are different than the ones that the papers want you to hear about.
1) Bill 22 restricts or removes their rights to organize, something in contravention of international laws
2) Bill 22 seeks to "encourage good teachers" with extra pay, but then defines "good teachers" as those willing to accept more than 30 students in their classroom... a situation that leads to a marked drop in quality of education for students. In other words, only teachers who don't care will take on more students, basing their decision on extra funds
Last I heard, there were a few other labour code violating terms that the government wishes to impose via Bill 22, but I'm not privvy to exact details... so I can't comment on them. The bare bones of the Bill, however, is basically a regression of 2-3 contracts worth of gains made through collective bargaining.
As for the money issue, the teachers have taken wage freezes in exchange for classroom concessions designed to benefit the children over the last 3-4 contracts. Since the government has consistently retracted those concessions, the teachers are now saying "screw it, show us the money instead".
Imagine that you sign a contract in good faith with your employer; imgaine that you agree to take a substandard wage so that your work place has better/ergo equipment, energy saving/eco management, and makes sparkly unicorns for the homeless for added fun. Now imagine that, immediately after agreeing to that, your employer rips up your contract, refuses to negotiate in good faith...and tells you that "since you signed the last one at that wage, you shouldn't mind signing the next one at the same wage... except, we don't have any money for those other things that you traded extra money for... oh, and we want you to take a pay cut in other ways as well".
And before you say "good, let em get a real job!", ask yourself "would I be willing to baby sit evne one other persons brat of a child, let alone 30 of them?" I mean, if you want some 6 dollar an hour employee who doesn't give a rats ass to be in charge of overseeing your kids... well... good luck, you get what you pay for. Personally, I'd rather see the job done right (and for those paying into private schools, it's nice to be rich... isn't it? Remember, only a small fraction of your money actually goes into the schooling of your child.... the majority goes into profits for the private owners)
A note on provincial payscale:
- teachers take 10 years to reach peak pay scale
- 1st year teachers make 35k, after 5 years of university
- Peak pay is 65k/year, with masters and doctorate earning slightly larger sums
- VP's and Principals do make more, I believe Principals earn in the 80k range... but they are classified as administrators, rather than unionized teachers
- College/University instructors earn more, but that is more because they require Masters degrees to start with.
Hopefully this clarifies anybody who's wondering about "overpaid" teachers.
1) Bill 22 restricts or removes their rights to organize, something in contravention of international laws
2) Bill 22 seeks to "encourage good teachers" with extra pay, but then defines "good teachers" as those willing to accept more than 30 students in their classroom... a situation that leads to a marked drop in quality of education for students. In other words, only teachers who don't care will take on more students, basing their decision on extra funds
Last I heard, there were a few other labour code violating terms that the government wishes to impose via Bill 22, but I'm not privvy to exact details... so I can't comment on them. The bare bones of the Bill, however, is basically a regression of 2-3 contracts worth of gains made through collective bargaining.
As for the money issue, the teachers have taken wage freezes in exchange for classroom concessions designed to benefit the children over the last 3-4 contracts. Since the government has consistently retracted those concessions, the teachers are now saying "screw it, show us the money instead".
Imagine that you sign a contract in good faith with your employer; imgaine that you agree to take a substandard wage so that your work place has better/ergo equipment, energy saving/eco management, and makes sparkly unicorns for the homeless for added fun. Now imagine that, immediately after agreeing to that, your employer rips up your contract, refuses to negotiate in good faith...and tells you that "since you signed the last one at that wage, you shouldn't mind signing the next one at the same wage... except, we don't have any money for those other things that you traded extra money for... oh, and we want you to take a pay cut in other ways as well".
And before you say "good, let em get a real job!", ask yourself "would I be willing to baby sit evne one other persons brat of a child, let alone 30 of them?" I mean, if you want some 6 dollar an hour employee who doesn't give a rats ass to be in charge of overseeing your kids... well... good luck, you get what you pay for. Personally, I'd rather see the job done right (and for those paying into private schools, it's nice to be rich... isn't it? Remember, only a small fraction of your money actually goes into the schooling of your child.... the majority goes into profits for the private owners)
A note on provincial payscale:
- teachers take 10 years to reach peak pay scale
- 1st year teachers make 35k, after 5 years of university
- Peak pay is 65k/year, with masters and doctorate earning slightly larger sums
- VP's and Principals do make more, I believe Principals earn in the 80k range... but they are classified as administrators, rather than unionized teachers
- College/University instructors earn more, but that is more because they require Masters degrees to start with.
Hopefully this clarifies anybody who's wondering about "overpaid" teachers.






