Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Now, THIS is a pervert!!

  1. #1
    Gentleman Horndog
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    4,974

    Now, THIS is a pervert!!

    Sex with dead deer not illegal, lawyer argues

    Wisconsin case hinges on definition of 'animal'

    By Lester Haines

    Friday 17th November 2006 16:20 GMT

    The defence lawyer of a Wisconsin man charged with having sex with a dead deer is claiming he's innocent of any wrongdoing - because a "crimes against sexual morality" statute prohibits sex with animals, but fails to mention carcasses, The Duluth News Tribune reports.

    Bryan James Hathaway, 20, of Superior, was arrested on "a misdemeanour charge of sexual gratification with an animal" after indulging in intercourse with said deceased deer on 11 October.

    His attorney, public defender Fredric Anderson, last week filed a motion with a Douglas County court which argued "because the deer was dead, it was not considered an animal and the charge should be dismissed". He wrote: "The statute does not prohibit one from having sex with a carcass."

    He further argued that, according to Webster's dictionary, an animal is "any of a kingdom of living beings". If you include carcasses in that definition, Anderson reasoned, "you really go down a slippery slope with absurd results".

    Anderson demanded that a judge clarify "what the Legislature intended 'animal' to mean in the statute", insisting: "And the only clear point to draw the line in that definition, I believe, is the point of death."

    Assistant district attorney James Boughner countered by saying that the court could indeed use a dictionary to determine the meaning of a word, but isn't obliged to do so. He told Judge Michael Lucci that "when a person's pet dog dies, the person still refers to the dog as his or her dog, not a carcass".

    "It stays a dog for some time," Boughner added, noting that Hathaway himself had referred to the dead deer as exactly that, and not a carcass, when confronted by police.

    Brougher concluded by stating the "statute was on punishing the human behaviour, not protecting animals".

    "It does not seem to draw a line between the living and the dead," he noted. Interpreting the statue to exclude carcasses would, moreover, "also exclude freshly killed animals", Boughner insisted. This, in turn, "could lead to people who commit such acts with animals to kill them".

    Boughner's latter point seems to be backed up by Hathaway's previous form, which saw him in April 2005 plead "no contest to one felony charge of mistreatment of an animal for the shooting death of Bambrick, a 26-year-old horse, to have sex with the animal".

    Judge Lucci summed the matter up concisely with: "I'm a little surprised this issue hasn't been tackled before in another case." He then promised to render a decision before Hathaway's next court appearance on 1 December.

    Hathaway faces a possible nine months' jail and a fine of up to $10,000 on the deer sex rap, but if convicted, "could serve a prison term of up to two years because of a previous conviction".

  2. #2
    Cunning Linguist
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lower Mainland, BC
    Posts
    184
    wow... beastiality and necrophilia all rolled in to one. not to mention wrongful death (of the horse)

    scary

  3. #3
    Registered User BDAClub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lower Mainland
    Posts
    563
    You have got to be kidding me......what a freakin nutbar!!
    I'll make 'em an offer they can't refuse!!

  4. #4
    fuck me........

    would someone just croak this toad already

  5. #5
    well, maybe some prison sex will straighten him out ...
    Loose Lips Sink Dicks!

  6. #6
    I guess he got tired of using a liver or apple pie. lol.
    Please note the absence of any personal attacks, jerkhoodness or other bannable offences in the above content.
    <a href="http://giftube.com/"><img src="http://91.121.71.200/gifs/4398.gif" alt=""></a><br/><a style="padding:3px;background: transparent;color:#00ADEF;font-family:tahoma;font-size:10px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;" href="http://giftube.com/" target="_blank">Gifs at Giftube.com </a>

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    surrey
    Posts
    1,467
    That sounds like the sex my wife was giving me before she asked for the divorce.
    I'd love to put 8 inches up you, but I won't fold it in half even for you!

  8. #8
    Complex Goddess
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    589
    What confounds me is how does one come to realize that not just animals, but dead animals are a turn on? Did he spot some road kill in the ditch, pop a hard on and think "I gotta get me some of that"?

    Yeesh.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Westwood
    Posts
    5,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Whorewald
    I guess he got tired of using a liver or apple pie. lol.
    ...or his sister, or brother, mother,father, sheep, cows, cousins...
    They don't call country music "Cousin-fuckin' Music" for nothing.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Republic of Burnaby
    Posts
    1,245
    My x-wife called me dear alot

  11. #11
    Registered User BDAClub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lower Mainland
    Posts
    563
    I just think....what a waste of court time .....I mean if he wants have at er with road kill while rigomortis (sp?) set's in......let the freak but don't drag it thru court!!

    Not a real one anyway let Judge Wopner take a run at him.....lol
    Last edited by BDAClub; 11-18-2006 at 03:14 AM.
    I'll make 'em an offer they can't refuse!!

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by jjinvan
    His lawyer is kinda right, after all, do you lock up someone for using a sheep-skin condom for having sex with a sheep?
    no, his lawyers a fucking greasy dirt bag

    as for why what he did wrong, natural law

  13. #13
    jus call me MR. President
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,166
    I'll bet that guy has a lot of fun grocery shopping in the meat department.
    <center><DIV STYLE="color: white ; background-color:#FF0000; width: 200px;">
    <table><tr><td><FONT face='Arial' size=2>
    <i>Yo no te ofrezco riquezas
    Te ofrezco mi corazon
    Te ofrezco mi corazon
    A cambio de mi pobreza.

    Malaguena salerosa
    Besar tus labios quisiera
    Besar tus labios quisiera.
    Malaguena salerosa
    Y decirte nina hermosa.
    </i></FONT>
    </td></tr></table>
    </DIV></center>

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Republic of Burnaby
    Posts
    1,245
    I don't get it what did he do wrong? Have u ever been to Winnipeg? Scary Man?

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Manitoba
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by necko
    I don't get it what did he do wrong? Have u ever been to Winnipeg? Scary Man?
    While this post no doubt makes sense in necko-land, I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who's trying to figure out what you mean. I've lived in Winnipeg most of my life but I don't recall a local character known as "Scary Man". Or were you just having another punctuation meltdown and you actually meant "scary, man"? If that's the case, then I have to agree. You can't drive anywhere here without passing dozens of people along the side of the road having sex with dead dogs, dead racoons, dead moose, dead gerbils, you name it. I'm past the point of being outraged by it anymore and just accept it as part of life in Winnipeg.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •