Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Mya@CL

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    all over the place
    Posts
    66

    Mya@CL

    Pretty girl, nice body, decent conversationalist.
    No kissing, no DATY, quite passive. Not a repeat for me.

  2. #2
    Distinguished Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Midwest, U.S.A.
    Posts
    910
    Sounds like another Giselle.

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    here, sometimes there....
    Posts
    285
    there were rules!!!!!
    i was new....
    xo...mia of le

  4. #4
    Banned chuck1561's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,529
    Originally posted by mia
    there were rules!!!!!
    i was new....
    xo...mia of le
    those were pretty old posts that you bumped up mia..they were made almost 2 years ago..

  5. #5
    Cuddly Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    39
    Maybe she's trying to insinuate that those "rules" no longer apply? Anyone willing to TOFTT to find out?

    -ZB.

  6. #6
    Banned chuck1561's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,529
    Originally posted by Zeddybear
    Maybe she's trying to insinuate that those "rules" no longer apply? Anyone willing to TOFTT to find out?

    -ZB.
    sorry Zeddy..I don't TOFTT..I would think that it would be obvious to people that in 2 years things can change..but if you are into TOFTT..go right ahead..I don't book appts on insinuations and the "team" doesn't pay for my appts...no offense

    and I think she is in Van not Victoria..unless she's moved here..

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    The left coast
    Posts
    791
    Might be some mistaken identity here. The pics of Mia on LE's website look nothing like the Mya of CL that I saw a couple of years back.

    Add that to interpreting the MIA (Missing in Action) Edmonton thread as one looking for Mia of Vancouver, and there might be some room for error to be considered.

    Mya of CL was not positively reviewed, and CL's version of Vicki left most of the rules to the girls, as far as I could determine.

  8. #8
    Banned chuck1561's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,529

    Wink I think

    you may have hit the nail on the head with that one James..

  9. #9
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    here, sometimes there....
    Posts
    285
    i was "Mya" of cleos during the summer last year. june and july. the one he spoke of was me. i don't know of any girl before that and i'm sure she was a great person. I am now Mia independant. so put your money where your mouth is. what i said was there are rules to working there and they are not bad ones as they keep things in working order. i have my reasons for leaving. that's all. stop judging by what you think you know...
    mia...so

  10. #10
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    here, sometimes there....
    Posts
    285
    independantly i can and will make my own rules and if i had asked for reviews i'm sure you could know by now. i am and am proud to be unusual and will remain as such....just be honest and honest with a little class and some sophistication when reviewing these women that don't deserve less....it's on the same level as you for doing what you do....so judgements are hypocritical when they become gossipy as i have witnessed.....
    mia....xo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •