Yep.A comment I saw on social media recently has stuck in my mind
It went something along the lines of “if you have 80 packages of toilet paper and no guns, you have no toilet paper.”
We need to be realistic about the economic damage of indefinite shutdowns. The government is making a show of giving help, but it’s like putting a bandaid over a bullet wound. And there is only a finite amount of bailout money.
If the economy collapses, so will society. And crime rates will skyrocket because people will start doing whatever they need to do to survive.
Will those who receive the vaccine, say in one year from now, still "get the virus"?this appears to be a very interested intersect between public health policy and economic policy. indeed, eventually, within 12 to 24 months, just about everybody will get the virus.
Can you please post a link to the actual studies .Will those who receive the vaccine, say in one year from now, still "get the virus"?
"The Ultimate Solution" to COVID-19:
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...s-Medical-Current-Drug-Treatments-vs-Vaccines
"International Studies Find Chloroquine has 100% Success Rate Treating Wuhan Virus in 6 Days":
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1155729
Whether it's China, Canada or whichever country. It would be extremely difficult to know exactly what percentage of the population has been infected with the virus. Main reason, no country has actually tested their entire population. Even if a country could test it's entire population, viral infection is fluid and not static. Case in point, just because you don't have HIV based on a test taken today, doesn't mean you won't get HIV at some point in the future. Now when it comes to China, I don't think anyone will actually ever know the actual number given their control of media and general secrecy their government takes on most matters. Even if the your Chinese numbers are accurate (i.e. 91k infected), it's best to run that against number of people tested rather than the entire population. In any event, when this thing passes, even then we probably won't know the "true" number of people infected - experts will merely estimate what they think was the total number infected.What does not add up is that China is saying that only around 81K people were infected and yet they are also saying they are having no new cases ?!?!
With a population of 1.4B and only 91k infected, if my math is correct (and it usually is), then only 0.006% of the Chinese population is now immune. That is one hell of a long way from the approximately 60% required to reach herd immunity. Even if we only look at Wuhan province with 60 million people, that is still only 0.14 % immunity!
So either the Chinese government is giving out false information (shocking!) or herd immunity is not required at all if we are to believe the Chinese.
Does anyone care to explain this discrepancy.
JD
No they don't."International Studies Find Chloroquine has 100% Success Rate Treating Wuhan Virus in 6 Days":
No, i have no intention of posting "actual studies". Leave that to those who have an interest in such things.Can you please post a link to the actual studies .
As this information about FDA approving the use for Coronavirus
and Trumps words are not accurate .
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/19/politics/fact-check-chloroquine-trump-fda/index.html
FDA has not approved this or any other drug in the US as a vaccine
or treatment for COVID19. They are looking at it as away to reduce the
duration of symptoms in patients as well viral shedding. Which may help
reduce of spreading. So no , not a miraculous cure as Trump was suggesting .
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pre...hloroquine&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua
The video was from a news station, not a sports forum or Oprah.No they don't.
Don't go to sports forums for medical advice.
physorg is citing actual peer reviewed research from several real journals.
Don't spread misinformation or rumours from spurious chat rooms or Oprah or Rush.