Massage Adagio

Has China become a fascist state?

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
2,420
627
113
Victoria
Its a Communist State... If by Facist you mean the rich oligarchy runs things and the rich/powerful have more rights than the rest of the chinese population. Its run by a dictator for life... oh sorry president for life....

The communist state in Russia fell to the oligarchs, after the Berlin wall fell and communism collapsed because the states starved it of food and out spent it in military buildup. China is doing the same to the US now, only the technological gap keeps the US ahead. That is closing. China if allowed access to 5G communication in the west would be able to spy on the technological gap and close it. China will have a bigger GNP than the US in the near future and has the capability to expand further. This is what the US is worried about. The other big country to watch is India....

The Chinese government works on the idea of keeping itself in power, through show of power and crushing any rebellion. It does not want to lose control of its power. Stalin killed millions. The Chinese will kill tens of millions and silence them and their relatives/friends.

Hong Kong will declare its independence from China. The younger generation in HK sees the writting on the wall and are now rebelling. You see China needs HK for access to the western world.

You see in the 1990's alot of Asian mutual funds went belly up that were based in HK. All that money went somewhere....
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
Since Tibet, Chinese Communist Party is clearly fascistic

Since Darfur genocide, CCP is clearly fascist:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttMuKo5usd0&t=14m35s
I would disagree on Tibet; The massacre was not done on racial grounds, but on religious and politics.

Sudan is also not based on racial, but on national interest.

While methods are similar, the practices originate from different ends of the political spectrum.
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
CCP is clearly supremacist. Relations with all other peoples are called “barbarian management”. The Arab Janjaweed deployed to create a cordon sanitaire around oil operations were explicitly racialist and hollered the Arab equivalent of “burn niggers” while razing whole villages. “Those who’ve interviewed refugees from Darfur also allege that Janjaweed commanders are using racism as a rallying point, encouraging their charges to rape the dark-skinned villagers they encounter during their raids.”

Time to wake up.

Source:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2004/07/who-are-the-janjaweed.html
"Barbarian management" was used in the Qing dynasty some 150 years ago and no longer in common practice. In fact the only place one would hear it is in Chinese TV shows.

CCP is supremacist, but not racially. Communist ideologie forbids racial discrimination and the CCP isn't known to act based on racial grounds.

Protecting economic interests isn't racist. Just because a few commanders decide to shout it doesn't mean it's based off racist tendencies.

This doesn't make CCP less dictatorial or exonerate them from war-crimes or crimes against humanity. But the definitions of traditional fascism doesn't apply to the Communists.
 

testicles

New member
Aug 30, 2015
120
0
0
The communist state in Russia fell to the oligarchs, after the Berlin wall fell and communism collapsed because the states starved it of food and out spent it in military buildup.
If they're the biggest country in the world and still couldn't feed their own people it was their own government's fault.

What actually happened was that the hardliners hated Gorbachev and overthrew him, but the hardliners had little support outside of Soviet Central Asia for a return to the Brezhnev era. So Yeltsin filled the void.
 
Last edited:

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
Ever hear of the *Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact? Hitler and Stalin's cozy little arrangement to carve up Poland? Fascism and communism are near Siamese twins. It should be noted Mao was Stalinist. It's why he was appalled by Khrushchev. Hence the Sino-Soviet split.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact
Fascism and Communism are both dictatorships. But they don't approach problems the same way.

Fascism is dominated by nationalism, racial purity and social Darwinism.

Communism is dominated by socialism, patriotism and common ownership.

Odd comparison, considering CCP isn't founded on racist ideologies, doesn't believe in social ideology nor does it believe in glory through war and conquest as evident in fascist states in Germany and Japan.
 

JimDandy

Well-known member
May 17, 2004
2,931
464
83
66
Lower Mainland, B.C.
Fascism and Communism are both dictatorships. But they don't approach problems the same way.

Fascism is dominated by nationalism, racial purity and social Darwinism.

Communism is dominated by socialism, patriotism and common ownership.

Odd comparison, considering CCP isn't founded on racist ideologies, doesn't believe in social ideology nor does it believe in glory through war and conquest as evident in fascist states in Germany and Japan.
But neither does the CCP believe in common ownership, not any more at least. It may have started out that way. In some ways, China is now more capitalist than the USA.

And does the following article not seem familiar to the rise of Natzi Germany, parading weapons, etc ?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/china-high-tech-weapons-parade-1.5304891

Heil Xi Jinping
https://i.cbc.ca/1.5304973.15699638...ves/original_780/china-anniversary-parade.jpg

China may not have a eugenics program (at least not that we know of), but it does have "re-education" camps which hold hundreds of thousands of its own people that did not drink voluntarily the Chinese koolaid; and try to get a Chinese passport if you are white, it is almost impossible.

JD
 
Last edited:

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
But neither does the CCP believe in common ownership, not any more at least. It may have started out that way. In some ways, China is now more capitalist than the USA.
China just nationalized about a 100 of its top businesses with most of those executives stepping down.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-04-12/china-is-nationalizing-its-tech-sector

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/03/business/china-economy-private-enterprise.html

And does the following article not seem familiar to the rise of Natzi Germany, parading weapons, etc ?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/china-high-tech-weapons-parade-1.5304891
Military parades is not a Fascist-exclusive phenomenon.

That's just how Chinese people wave.

China may not have a eugenics program (at least not that we know of), but it does have "re-education" camps which hold hundreds of thousands of its own people that did not drink voluntarily the Chinese koolaid; and try to get a Chinese passport if you are white, it is almost impossible.
Re-education is based on ideology. Most of them are tortured but eventually let go.

Concentration camps are based on race. Most of them are tortured and eventually killed.
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
Around 30 million girls have been aborted or killed by infanticide in China. In Jiangxi the sex ratio is an astounding 143 males to 100 females. Using Deutsche Welle’s figure, there are ~170 million surplus males in Asia. Many of these males are now buying girls or women from poorer, “lesser” countries. Many are migrating and attempting to reproduce with Europeans and Africans to advance what is believed to be the master race. Definitely a form of eugenics.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Chinese_anti_infanticide_tract_from_1800.jpg
Do you even know what you're talking about? Sexual discrimination has nothing to do with eugenics.

Eugenics is the systematic breeding of superior genes often at the lives and expendability of lesser beings in the gene pool. There's no evidence of such practice in China. Most Chinese people want to marry Europeans for prestige, not genetic superiority.

I'm not excusing or condoning these acts but your grasp of concepts relating to politics is terribly diluted and disconnected from reality.
 

masterblaster

Well-known member
May 19, 2004
1,592
727
113
I don’t know about China being fascist but is certainly totalitarian. I know someone who went to teach English there some years ago. He said he saw in Beijing condemned prisoners being driven through the streets in the back of a gravel truck. They were taken to a soccer stadium and shot in the back of the head. The public was encouraged to attend lest they get the idea that crime paid.
 

masterblaster

Well-known member
May 19, 2004
1,592
727
113
Do you even know what you're talking about? Sexual discrimination has nothing to do with eugenics.

Eugenics is the systematic breeding of superior genes often at the lives and expendability of lesser beings in the gene pool. There's no evidence of such practice in China. Most Chinese people want to marry Europeans for prestige, not genetic superiority.

I'm not excusing or condoning these acts but your grasp of concepts relating to politics is terribly diluted and disconnected from reality.
I heard that the Chinese government got the tallest man and tallest woman they could find in China to have a child and they were the parents of Yao Ming the basketball player.
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
Many of the 30 million surplus Chinese males are trying to import females from lesser countries e.g. Cambodia, Vietnam. Others are travelling around the world trying to mate with native females. In both scenarios, the plan is to impart Chinese genes into “barbarian” populations. Ergo, it is a form of eugenics whereby barbarian males are displaced in favour of Chinese genetics.

There is also China’s CRISPR babies:

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/613614/chinas-crispr-babies-could-face-earlier-death/
You're drinking way too much cool-aid.
 

Bobby1968

Member
Dec 31, 2014
42
1
6
You're drinking way too much cool-aid.
It was actually Flavor Aid.

“As for the enigmatic Reverend Jim Jones, who was he? The Indiana-born Jones, a former community organizer, was a committed Marxist since at least the age of 18. His idol was Mao Tse-tung.”

We recommend Shiva Naipaul’s Journey to Nowhere - the definitive text on Jonestown - “universal mental retardation”. Our data points are tight, baby. Are yours?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/05/unburied-truth-about-jim-jones-j-delgado/
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
It was actually Flavor Aid.

“As for the enigmatic Reverend Jim Jones, who was he? The Indiana-born Jones, a former community organizer, was a committed Marxist since at least the age of 18. His idol was Mao Tse-tung.”

We recommend Shiva Naipaul’s Journey to Nowhere - the definitive text on Jonestown - “universal mental retardation”. Our data points are tight, baby. Are yours?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/05/unburied-truth-about-jim-jones-j-delgado/
You have a great grasp of facts but little grasp of interpretation. You're caught on semantics but lack central thesis to your arguments.

It's sort of like talking to someone who doesn't know the difference between apples and oranges.
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
You led with the tired cliché of drinking the “cool-aid”, which spelled correctly is Kool-Aid, but was actually Flavor Aid at Jonestown. My central thesis is crystal clear: from to Jim Jones to online gaslighters, the land is awash with Maoists.
Proving my point - Large on facts, low on interpretation. You recite information without considering context nor do you provide any analysis or insight.

Actually, that's what Communist education does - Brainwashing people with facts and strips their ability to interpret or think. So you proved your own point after all.
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
It was actually Flavor Aid.

“As for the enigmatic Reverend Jim Jones, who was he? The Indiana-born Jones, a former community organizer, was a committed Marxist since at least the age of 18. His idol was Mao Tse-tung.”

We recommend Shiva Naipaul’s Journey to Nowhere - the definitive text on Jonestown - “universal mental retardation”. Our data points are tight, baby. Are yours?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/05/unburied-truth-about-jim-jones-j-delgado/
By the way, you should see the first line in that article you posted:

"Update 9/27/19: The author of the scientific report described in this story, Rasmus Nielsen of the University of California, Berkeley, announced on Twitter that his findings were “likely” wrong due to data errors and that he plans to correct the scientific record. This means Nielsen did not find evidence that mutations in a gene called CCR5 can shorten lifespan, as originally claimed."
 

testicles

New member
Aug 30, 2015
120
0
0
Fascism and Communism are both dictatorships. But they don't approach problems the same way.

Fascism is dominated by nationalism, racial purity and social Darwinism.

Communism is dominated by socialism, patriotism and common ownership.

Odd comparison, considering CCP isn't founded on racist ideologies, doesn't believe in social ideology nor does it believe in glory through war and conquest as evident in fascist states in Germany and Japan.
Communists talk a better game than fascists, but they can certainly have the potential to be just as racist.

One example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Operation_of_the_NKVD
 

nightswhisper

Member
Feb 20, 2016
789
8
18
Communists talk a better game than fascists, but they can certainly have the potential to be just as racist.

One example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Operation_of_the_NKVD
Wouldn't call it racist, but typically Communist.

Fascists would just outright execute the Poles. The problem with Communists is that problems are solved quantitatively rather than qualitatively. In this case, someone wanted to kill Polish agents. But the lower rung thought it easier to just kill all Poles. The reality is that it didn't originate as a racist sentiment but came out of it that way.

In China, dog licenses cost more than dogs. This dumb policy means many people cannot afford the licenses. The local authorities would confiscate dogs and sell them for meat and then bill the owners for violations.

Communism allows the lower class to usurp power, and the lower class are seldom enlightened thinkers.
 

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
2,420
627
113
Victoria
I thought the idea of higher prices for licences was to get away from dog meat, ending up in the food chain.... oh well We all view things a little differently.....
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts