just being real about london

tyler3

New member
Jul 26, 2008
21
0
0
I am sorry to put it out there but I was reading the stuff about London. She is a nice girl but is not 29 lets be real. CA why you lying this girl must be at least 40. I saw her as Tyra and she is nothing to brag about. You can argue all you want but false advertising is not cool. :mad:
 

DarkPrince

Active member
Jul 15, 2008
292
76
28
Majority of agencies always describe ladies age 5-10 year year younger than she actually is. They are just baits waiting for fish.
 

planetsmurf

papa smurf
Apr 13, 2005
1,109
2
0
it sucks and i have seen a few sp that are older then what they claim. but nowadays i only see sp that i know have been reviewed. before i found perb about half the sp i saw i would classify as bad session. sometimes it was them,sometimes it was me and not asking the right questions. i learned that if you want a good session, then basically go with the sp that is well reviewed because in some of the reviews you will find your information that you want. i remember when ashley sweets first started in the business at CA she was listed as 25 i believe. and now she listed like 39(not sure on that age) and its 3-4 years later. but so far out of every sp i have ever seen she was the best:)
 

DarkPrince

Active member
Jul 15, 2008
292
76
28
I have seen her during her days with VE. On first experience she was charming till she got money. After that turned ugly. On second I think she changed name. I gave her money but did not finish business. Agencies should be more accountable, for their employees. Other than that I rather stick with indy's.
 

Violet

New member
Dec 22, 2005
432
4
0
Vancouver
Just to clarify something, escorts are not actually technically the "employees" of agencies, in fact it is closer to being the other way around, we hire them to represent us, we pay them, we are not legally considered employees, etc. However I guess it is kind of a grey area because you can still get fired from an escort agency, although perhaps not as easily as some clients might hope :) (I got this impression from some other recent threads). I guess you could say the agency "decides to no longer represent" the sp, rather than "fire" her if you want to get technical.

In general an agency can't force all the individual escorts they represent to give excellent service all of the time, & can't really have a "customer is always right no matter what" policy like some other businesses, nor are they going to fire everyone who gets a bad review, all they can do is have a general code of conduct & choose only to represent those ladies that seem to abide by it.

I hope that more guys would see that it is each lady's responsibility for her quality of service & not always something the agency has a lot of control over, nor does a bad time with one lady mean that all the other sps at that agency are the same or that no one should visit that agency because you will be guaranteed bad service. It is often more about what sp you see than what agency she works with, which is why Perb is so useful. However, of course most good agencies will try to do something for a client who has a truly bad time with a lady, whether it is simply talking to her about her level of service, or in exteme cases (for example where the client obviously did not get what he paid for) doing something such as giving the client a discount.
 

DarkPrince

Active member
Jul 15, 2008
292
76
28
Voilet your PM makes sense. The problem with this particular SP is she changes names and agencies frequently. She has no interest in providing service, she just want money. After she gets money she become rude and cold. In one of session I got fooled due to name and agency change. I showed up, it was her. I gave her money and walked out of session.
 

maude

Paradise Island
Jun 6, 2002
706
0
0
Vancouver Island
Why?

Voilet your PM makes sense. The problem with this particular SP is she changes names and agencies frequently. She has no interest in providing service, she just want money. After she gets money she become rude and cold. In one of session I got fooled due to name and agency change. I showed up, it was her. I gave her money and walked out of session.
As a client, you always have the right to decline service .... Your action "I gave her money and walked out of session" does not make sense:confused:
 

DarkPrince

Active member
Jul 15, 2008
292
76
28
Maude It was at VE. I was placed in room by phone lady. When she arrived, I did not feel right to leave. This was my second visit. She was so uninvolved, I lost the interest.
 

Violet

New member
Dec 22, 2005
432
4
0
Vancouver
Oh I am certainly not doubting at all your right to be upset DarkPrince, & I'm sorry to hear you had a bad time with a local SP, but I was mainly responding to the various posts in this & several other threads (not just your's) saying things like agencies should be more accountable for their "employees", or to those that are basically implying that if a guy says he has a bad time with the girl he should immediately get 100% of his money back & the girl should be fired, etc. My main points were to explain the little known fact that escorts are not technically employees of agencies, & to say that an entire agency (regardless of which agency it is) shouldn't be judged by one sp who has bad service or just because one sp has bad service doesn't mean that no one should go to that agency anymore. Not trying to discount your's or anyone else's bad experiences with particular SPs, or frustration felt when agencies don't seem to be responding to complaints. :)
 

maude

Paradise Island
Jun 6, 2002
706
0
0
Vancouver Island
lol ...

Maude It was at VE. I was placed in room by phone lady. When she arrived, I did not feel right to leave. This was my second visit. She was so uninvolved, I lost the interest.
Sounds like the little head was over-powering the other . . . .:rolleyes:
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts