A few threads over the years have explored the topic of sexuality in domination. Personally, I agree with others who proclaim there is no right and wrong here. I have experienced all range of scenes from "you'll be lucky just to think about me when you get home", to "I'm gonna milk you with my hand/vibrator/feet/favourite kitchen utensil/sock puppet/etc", to "you are mine and I will ride you when and where I want". As far as I am concerned, each has its own merrits. (Except that sock puppet thing - that's just gotta be sick - lol). Kinsters are welcome to crave whatever scene they want, and mistresses are welcome to offer whatever range of services they want. That's one of the great things about BDSM - acceptance of views that differ from our own, while co-habitating the same general erotic neighbourhood.
I admit to going through a tease and denail phase early on, seeking intense tension in scenes with de-emphasized release aspects. I guess that t-shirt got old after a while and I started craving more sensual and intimate scenes. Finally I came to grips with the fact that forced sexuality had great attraction and fulfillment for me. The ultimate freedom equated to physical, mental, and sexual submission for this kinster. But I can understand how others may crave different points along the continuum, and also how they too may meander along this realm exploring their boundaries and savouring the sensations and experiences along the way.
Ooooo, I'm getting hot hear. Gotta go pour myself a nice cool beverage.
So brothers and sisters, let us not debate the righteousness of one perversion over another. I shall revel in your kinked-ness, and I dearly want to continue hearing your fantasies and fetishes, as I hope to contiue sharing mine.
'Kink is like a 1,000 room hotel, each room catering to a different dark desire. I want to strip myself naked of all preconceptions and run furiously through the halls, ride the elevators, hide in the broomclosets, and pull a Kramer entrance into each room in the joint'.
Who's with me?