The Raquel Rose

GBM Banning

Moderator

New member
Mar 23, 2006
232
0
0
BcMod said:
I am keeping an eye on this thread. Mostly a good discussion, with different view points. I have deleted 2 posts, one referring to terrorists as praise worthy (sorry, just couldn't stomache that, no matter what your belief system, murder is murder) and the other where one member slammed another - I won't let this turn into our own little war.

Different views are welcome, when respectfully stated and are not outrageous.




georgebushmoron said:
Ok let's try this on for size. ***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Let's see what happens to this post.
Not really funny or all that smart.

I don't pretend to understand a lot of this thread, but I do understand your post was nothing more than an attempt to bait one of the mods. You Like playing games George? Fine go play with Scotty and some of the other Mensa members, when you get back After Christmas you can give us a full report.
 

OTBn

New member
Jan 2, 2006
568
0
0
Speaking of that Israeli measured response – cause only a bunker buster will do…


uhhh, might not a less severe admonition have accomplished the same intent? Seems GBM has been a significant contributor in the past…
 

gotsome2004

Bun wrapped wiener
Oct 15, 2004
453
0
0
Montreal
Gbm

His posts were more than just a significant contribution in the past, but one of the only few people on this thread who posted any objective and intellectualy thought out opinions.

His only fault may have been that his dissenting views against Israeli and U.S. aggression in the middle east was not favorable to he who banned him.
 

stryker

Banned
Jan 23, 2004
1,954
4
0
119
In your dreams
hitman.us
OTBn said:
Speaking of that Israeli measured response – cause only a bunker buster will do…


uhhh, might not a less severe admonition have accomplished the same intent? Seems GBM has been a significant contributor in the past…

I had thought certain banned members from kamloops were not allowed to advertise here?:rolleyes:
 

steverino

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2004
1,564
1,032
113
I can't help but laugh...

gotsome2004 said:
His posts were more than just a significant contribution in the past, but one of the only few people on this thread who posted any objective and intellectualy thought out opinions.

His only fault may have been that his dissenting views against Israeli and U.S. aggression in the middle east was not favorable to he who banned him.

Gotsome has decided that Moron's posts were "objective." His opinions like everything else in the thread are "subjective" based on individual beliefs. Don't you think someone who chooses the name GBMoron might be a bit biased against the US position whatever it is. The two things you can certainly conclude about Moron is that he is not objective and his positions lack any intellectual merit because they are based on an extreme bias to begin with.
 

gravitas

New member
Feb 7, 2006
2,175
0
0
gotsome2004 said:
His only fault.....
don't know if I'd go so far as that.....he pulled it out and pissed on the mods, the mods took issue with this and banned him

there are other dissenting opinions in this thread that haven't resulted in anyone being banned

shame the fucker is gone since I enjoyed some of our sparing


stryker said:
I had thought certain banned members from kamloops were not allowed to advertise here?:rolleyes:
ROTFLMAO

maybe things are a little slow at the KSB
<img src='http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2004-4/688404/SPERMBANK.jpg' width=640 height=480 >
I'll never get tired of using that pic


steverino said:
His opinions like everything else in the thread are "subjective" based on individual beliefs
True, but GBM's opinions have far more legitimacy then other left wing keister spikes like alfret or caliscott
 

FuZzYknUckLeS

Monkey Abuser
May 11, 2005
2,215
0
0
Schmocation
steverino said:
Gotsome has decided that Moron's posts were "objective." His opinions like everything else in the thread are "subjective" based on individual beliefs. Don't you think someone who chooses the name GBMoron might be a bit biased against the US position whatever it is. The two things you can certainly conclude about Moron is that he is not objective and his positions lack any intellectual merit because they are based on an extreme bias to begin with.
I agree with you on the 'subjective' part. But then, I believe that same logic applies to us all on this board. Nevertheless, GBM always contributed solid content to the threads he chose to participate in, unlike others, myself included, and often had very valid points. He made me rethink my position on an issue more than once. I think the 6 month ban is harsh, but hey, it's not my board. :cool:

As for GBM's handle, I think one would have to be a moron not to know that it is intended tongue-in-cheek.
 

stryker

Banned
Jan 23, 2004
1,954
4
0
119
In your dreams
hitman.us
Man,,weirdest thread I have seen:eek:

Now,as far as GBM goes,,I didn't see his post,,I like the dude for what he says and his contributions to the board,,if he was out of line,,well,,smarten the fuck up there Goerge!!!!don't push it:p

As far as a ban,,send the fucker a notice and give him a day or 3,,he's a good shit and adds to this Venue;)

Now,,will you guys quit posting that pic of the fat broad on the plane!!!!damed,,that must have some powerfull motors :eek:
 

luckydog71

Active member
Oct 26, 2003
1,117
0
36
73
Washington State
Moderator said:
, when you get back After Christmas you can give us a full report.
Mod- I wish you would reconsider your 6 month ban for GWBM. There are occasions he can be obnoxious.... but I look forward to his responses.... He strongly believes in his position and does a great job at putting his arguments forward.... unfortunately he can take his passion too far...

He adds color (oops sorry colour) to the board...and I will miss him.
 

Randy Whorewald

Orgasm donor
Sep 20, 2005
3,327
0
0
Greek Islands
www.randydyck.com
I don't believe his handle was a problem to most of us here. I will miss his sharp wit and comments which espoused his somewhat left leaning views, with which, of course I did not agree. But they were his opinions, and he was entitled to give them. At times he was inclined to belittle those that disagreed with his views and that is something I naturally disagree with. Unfortunately when he decided to challenge the MOD he found his position was not as high as he had envisaged.
 

Randy Whorewald

Orgasm donor
Sep 20, 2005
3,327
0
0
Greek Islands
www.randydyck.com
gotsome2004 said:
His only fault may have been that his dissenting views against Israeli and U.S. aggression in the middle east was not favorable to he who banned him.
I hardly think that was the reason for his banning. There are lots of ppl on this board who did not agree with Israeli and /or US actions. Why aren't they banned too??
 

ms.belair

independent
Apr 8, 2006
324
0
0
I'm probably in my house.
As for GBM's handle, I think one would have to be a moron not to know that it is intended tongue-in-cheek.[/QUOTE]

I come from a pacifist back-ground, I've thrown stuff around, but I've never hit anyone, oh, wait, I jumped a guy in a bar once when he tried to make it out the door with the waitress's tray money.

Anyway, I'm probably on GBM's side, war is stupid, but so is thinking that bathing will eliminate the chance of disease if you eat out someone's ass.

Call me "anal-retentive", or "moron", or "asshole", whatever you want, I really don't mind, however I do think GBM should be allowed to reply to this particular ban, somehow.
 

steverino

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2004
1,564
1,032
113
FuZzYknUckLeS said:
I agree with you on the 'subjective' part. But then, I believe that same logic applies to us all on this board. Nevertheless, GBM always contributed solid content to the threads he chose to participate in, unlike others, myself included, and often had very valid points. He made me rethink my position on an issue more than once. I think the 6 month ban is harsh, but hey, it's not my board. :cool:

As for GBM's handle, I think one would have to be a moron not to know that it is intended tongue-in-cheek.

I agree with you Fuzzy that you haven't added much content to the threads you participate in.
 

hitrack

I'LL KILL YA ALL!!
Feb 25, 2003
3,883
0
0
Surrey
FuZzYknUckLeS said:
Nevertheless, GBM always contributed solid content to the threads he chose to participate in, unlike others, myself included,
Add me to that list. :rolleyes:

Never read the thread that got GBM the boot, I really have minimal interest in political debates. But it really seemed GBM did judging by his more than 2 line responses to most shit.

6 mos in brutal, hope he doesn't fukk off for good and just figger ta hell with this place.
 

planetsmurf

papa smurf
Apr 13, 2005
1,109
2
0
i agreed and disagreed with GBM but i wouldn't put it past him to challange a mod and well the mods responded. maybe he didn't think that he would be banned for so long but i had to believe he knew he would get banned.
 

Bartdude

New member
Jul 5, 2006
1,252
5
0
Calgary
If ya mess wit da bull, ya gets da horns....

I'll miss his banter too, but you can't piss all over the mods....

Maybe the time away from here will do him good...

Though I'm curious as to why six months for GBM and only a month for a fucking tool like Trintrin :confused:
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,712
572
113
Upstairs
I've had some disagreements with gbm in the past, and I've agreed with him on some things. He's helped me out on some stuff and pissed me off on others, but he crossed the line here and is paying the price. Bottom line, "Ya gots to show repect."
 

gravitas

New member
Feb 7, 2006
2,175
0
0
Tha_Bounce said:
I think that if someone just took a shit 3 mins before their appointment and you ate their ass out there is a greater chance of catching something vs if they decided to take a bath or quick wash right after their dump.
Sounds like a plot to one of Hamster's nursery rhymes
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts