Escort Agency bylaws vs Living off Avals, New Decision in Calgary raises issue

Dave in Phoenix

Active member
Jul 6, 2002
196
26
28
Phoenix AZ
www.sexworkcanada.com
Escort rules thrown into question
CBC News
A Calgary judge has dismissed some criminal charges against a former city firefighter who got into trouble for operating an escort agency in a case that could have broad implications for the sex trade and the way it's licensed.

Doug Eastaugh was facing 15 prostitution charges related to his sideline, Liaisons Escort Agency. All but one were dropped or stayed mainly because the judge agreed with the accused's defence – that he believed he wasn't doing anything wrong because the city gave him a license to do it.

Justice Patrick Sullivan, in his 81-page ruling, dismissed charges that Eastaugh was living off the avails of prostitution on the grounds that it was an "officially induced error." That is, the judge agreed with Eastaugh's defence that he had been somewhat misled by the city for issuing him a license in the first place.

Eastaugh's lawyer, Patrick Fagan, said the decision may force other jurisdictions to re-evaluate their licensing regulations for escort agencies.

"He (Eastaugh) honestly believed that he was protected – that he was insulated from prosecution as a consequence of being licensed by the City of Calgary."

Officials with the city say they aren't planning on changing the bylaws at the moment.

However, Stan Schwartzenberger, manager of Business and Development Licenses, said the city will review the matter to see whether changes are necessary.

"We do understand that the case was about an offence under the Criminal Code. From the city's perspective, the date and escort bylaw will continue to be in effect and will continue to be enforced as required."

Eastaugh was convicted of one count of operating a common bawdy house, charges that stem from women having sex with clients in his home. He won't face any further time in jail. The judge ruled that the 250 days Eastaugh has already served in jail was sufficient punishment.

Under Canadian law, prostitution is not illegal but living off the avails of prostitution is considered unlawful.
 

HaywoodJabloemy

Dissident
Mar 6, 2004
254
0
0
Never the safest place
Dave in Phoenix said:
CBC News
...in a case that could have broad implications for the sex trade and the way it's licensed...
A guy on Terb who sounds like he's a lawyer pointed out this decision probably won't lead to anything. Calgary will just do what other cities have already done, by adding something to the wording of the bylaws and licensing agreements that states the licence does not permit the escort agencies to be in the prostitution business and does not protect them from criminal charges of living on the avails.
 

Maury Beniowski

Blastocyst
Mar 31, 2004
1,869
1
0
In a nice wet pussy!
Funny, I've always thought governments have been living indirectly off the avails by charging astronomical business licenses, versus what they charge any other kind of businesses... And that doesn't say anything about skimming off taxes from the service providers. What hypocrites... :rolleyes:
 

HaywoodJabloemy

Dissident
Mar 6, 2004
254
0
0
Never the safest place
It's bizarre that no one in Canada ever questions the police and politicians over their long-standing tolerance of most MPs, agencies, and incalls that are obviously violating the Criminal Code. If we heard the same situation described in another country, the first reaction would be to say they were corrupt, not just hypocritical.

The cities take in the licensing money, and the cops pretend they're doing all they can when they lay a few charges once in a while, but the bigger cities have so many MPs and agencies that it would waste a huge amount of resources to go after all of them.
<p ALIGN=CENTER><IMG SRC="http://home.ripway.com/2005-1/243703/photos/Clvn&HbsResrces.gif"></p>
 

georgebushmoron

jus call me MR. President
Mar 25, 2003
3,130
2
0
54
Seattle
HaywoodJabloemy said:
A guy on Terb who sounds like he's a lawyer pointed out this decision probably won't lead to anything. Calgary will just do what other cities have already done, by adding something to the wording of the bylaws and licensing agreements that states the licence does not permit the escort agencies to be in the prostitution business and does not protect them from criminal charges of living on the avails.
This is exactly what is going to happen in Vancouver, Burnaby and Richmond. The pressure on municipalities to comply with federal regulations is enormous, and these cities will change the wording so they can still get revenues from licensing without being in contravention of the law.
 
Vancouver Escorts